Literature DB >> 25891405

Bite force in the extant coelacanth Latimeria: the role of the intracranial joint and the basicranial muscle.

Hugo Dutel1, Marc Herbin2, Gaël Clément3, Anthony Herrel4.   

Abstract

The terrestrialization process involved dramatic changes in the cranial anatomy of vertebrates. The braincase, which was initially divided into two portions by the intracranial joint in sarcopterygian fishes, became consolidated into a single unit in tetrapods and lungfishes [1-3]. The coelacanth Latimeria is the only extant vertebrate that retains an intracranial joint, which is associated with a unique paired muscle: the basicranial muscle. The intracranial joint has long been thought to be involved in suction feeding by allowing an extensive elevation of the anterior portion of the skull, followed by its rapid depression driven by the basicranial muscle [4-7]. However, we recently challenged this hypothesis [8, 9], and the role of the basicranial muscle with respect to the intracranial joint thus remains unclear. Using 3D biomechanical modeling, we show here that the basicranial muscle and the intracranial joint are involved in biting force generation. By flexing the anterior portion of the skull at the level of the intracranial joint, the basicranial muscle increases the overall bite force. This likely allows Latimeria to feed on a broad range of preys [10, 11] and coelacanths to colonize a wide range of environments during their evolution [4]. The variation in the morphology of the intracranial joint observed in Devonian lobe-finned fishes would have impacted to various degrees their biting performance and might have permitted feeding specializations despite the stability in their lower jaw morphology [12]. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25891405     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  6 in total

1.  Form-function relationships in dragonfly mandibles under an evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  Alexander Blanke; Helmut Schmitz; Alessandra Patera; Hugo Dutel; Michael J Fagan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Musculoskeletal modelling under an evolutionary perspective: deciphering the role of single muscle regions in closely related insects.

Authors:  Sina David; Johannes Funken; Wolfgang Potthast; Alexander Blanke
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  A digital dissection of two teleost fishes: comparative functional anatomy of the cranial musculoskeletal system in pike (Esox lucius) and eel (Anguilla anguilla).

Authors:  Robert Brocklehurst; Laura Porro; Anthony Herrel; Dominique Adriaens; Emily Rayfield
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 4.  Evolution and development of the fish jaw skeleton.

Authors:  April DeLaurier
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 5.814

5.  Suction feeding of West African lungfish (Protopterus annectens): An XROMM analysis of jaw mechanics, cranial kinesis, and hyoid mobility.

Authors:  Samantha M Gartner; Katrina R Whitlow; J D Laurence-Chasen; Elska B Kaczmarek; Michael C Granatosky; Callum F Ross; Mark W Westneat
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 2.643

6.  Contributions to the functional morphology of caudate skulls: kinetic and akinetic forms.

Authors:  Nikolay Natchev; Stephan Handschuh; Simeon Lukanov; Nikolay Tzankov; Borislav Naumov; Ingmar Werneburg
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.