Jia Li1, Jianzhao Wang1, Yongqian Li1, Decheng Shao1, Xiaona You1, Yong Shen2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and The Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics of Hebei Province, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and The Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics of Hebei Province, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China. Electronic address: docshenyong@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the results of patients who underwentanterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with autograft, γ-irradiated allograft, or hybrid graft in a prospective randomized study with a minimum clinical follow-up period of 5 years. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, comparative study, 102 patients with ACL tears underwentACL reconstruction with autograft (gracilis and semitendinosus tendons), γ-irradiated allograft (tibialis anterior tendons), or hybrid graft (γ-irradiated tibialis anterior tendon allograft and semitendinosus tendon autograft). Laboratory testing of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reaction protein level were performed; clinical results were evaluated with the KT-1000arthrometer (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA), Lachman test, Lysholm score, Tegner activity score, and International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation (both objective and subjective). RESULTS: There were 32 patients in the autograft group, 31 in the hybrid graft group, and 32 in the γ-irradiated allograft group at last follow-up. No differences were found among the 3 groups regarding patient demographic data and the duration from injury to operation (P > .05). The C-reaction protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate values were statistically higher in the γ-irradiated allograft group than in the other 2 groups on the third, seventh, and fourteenth days (P < .05). No significant differences were found between the autograft and hybrid graft groups (P > .05). The KT-1000 examination showed more anterior laxity in the γ-irradiated allograft group than in the other 2 groups (P < .05). No significant differences in the Lachman test and pivot-shift test findings were found among the 3 groups (P > .05). The Lysholm score, Tegner activity score, and International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation (subjective and objective) showed no differences among the 3 groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS:Patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction withhybrid graft or autograft had satisfactory and similar objective and subjective clinical results. On KT-1000 measurement of anteroposterior knee laxity, both the autograft and hybrid graft groups showed statistically significant differences compared with the γ-irradiated allograft group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To compare the results of patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with autograft, γ-irradiated allograft, or hybrid graft in a prospective randomized study with a minimum clinical follow-up period of 5 years. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, comparative study, 102 patients with ACL tears underwent ACL reconstruction with autograft (gracilis and semitendinosus tendons), γ-irradiated allograft (tibialis anterior tendons), or hybrid graft (γ-irradiated tibialis anterior tendon allograft and semitendinosus tendon autograft). Laboratory testing of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reaction protein level were performed; clinical results were evaluated with the KT-1000 arthrometer (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA), Lachman test, Lysholm score, Tegner activity score, and International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation (both objective and subjective). RESULTS: There were 32 patients in the autograft group, 31 in the hybrid graft group, and 32 in the γ-irradiated allograft group at last follow-up. No differences were found among the 3 groups regarding patient demographic data and the duration from injury to operation (P > .05). The C-reaction protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate values were statistically higher in the γ-irradiated allograft group than in the other 2 groups on the third, seventh, and fourteenth days (P < .05). No significant differences were found between the autograft and hybrid graft groups (P > .05). The KT-1000 examination showed more anterior laxity in the γ-irradiated allograft group than in the other 2 groups (P < .05). No significant differences in the Lachman test and pivot-shift test findings were found among the 3 groups (P > .05). The Lysholm score, Tegner activity score, and International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation (subjective and objective) showed no differences among the 3 groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS:Patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with hybrid graft or autograft had satisfactory and similar objective and subjective clinical results. On KT-1000 measurement of anteroposterior knee laxity, both the autograft and hybrid graft groups showed statistically significant differences compared with the γ-irradiated allograft group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.
Authors: Daniel Guenther; Sebastian Irarrázaval; Marcio Albers; Cara Vernacchia; James J Irrgang; Volker Musahl; Freddie H Fu Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jeremy M Burnham; Elmar Herbst; Thierry Pauyo; Thomas Pfeiffer; Darren L Johnson; Freddie H Fu; Volker Musahl Journal: Oper Tech Orthop Date: 2017-02-01
Authors: Benton E Heyworth; Evan T Zheng; Patrick Vavken; Elizabeth S Liotta; Dennis E Kramer; Yi-Meng Yen; Lyle J Micheli; Mininder S Kocher Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2021-01-22