Literature DB >> 2589114

The state of the frontal sinus after craniotomy.

W Mann1, H Riechelmann, J Gilsbach.   

Abstract

In 39 patients, 24 male, 15 female, the frontal sinus was opened during a frontal, a bifrontal or a pterional trephination for neurosurgical treatment of trauma, tumours or aneurysms. In 25 out of 39 patients the frontal sinus subsequently was obliterated, in 11 out of 39 patients the apical half or 2/3 of the sinus were ablated and the remaining caudal part covered with a galea periosteal flap leaving the fronto-nasal duct intact. In 3 out of 39 patients, the periphery of the sinus was ablated and the remaining part covered. All patients were followed over a mean period of 2 years and had a final evaluation using CTs, X-rays, ultrasonography and a complete ENT examination. In 4 out of 25 obliteration was successful and complete, in 16 out of 25 there was a partial or complete re-aeration of the residual sinus and in 5 out of 25 the sinus was infected. In one out of eleven patients where the frontal sinus was bisected with preservation of the lower half, the basal part of the sinus was infected, in 10 out of 11 the residual sinus was aerated and draining well. In one out of three patients where the periphery of the sinus was ablated, there was infection, two of three sinuses were aerated. Evaluating the experience in these 39 patients and our recent experience, obliteration of the sinus with muscle is very unreliable and the use of bone wax is obsolete. Covering a bisected or peripherally opened sinus with fascia or a galea periosteal flap will yield a well aerated and draining sinus, provided the naso-frontal duct is intact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2589114     DOI: 10.1007/bf01403593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  14 in total

1.  THE RATIONALE OF FRONTAL SINUS SURGERY.

Authors:  R L GOODALE
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Present state of the surgical treatment of chronic frontal sinusitis.

Authors:  A R BERGARA; A O ITOIZ
Journal:  AMA Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1955-06

3.  Nasofrontal duct in frontal sinus fractures.

Authors:  M May; J H Ogura; V Schramm
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1970-12

4.  [On the drainage of human paranasal sinuses under normal and pathologic conditions. 2. The frontal sinus and its evacuation system].

Authors:  W Messerklinger
Journal:  Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol       Date:  1967

5.  CT of the paranasal sinuses.

Authors:  P M Som
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  The tenacity of the frontal sinus mucosa.

Authors:  P J Donald
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979)       Date:  1979 Sep-Oct

7.  Surgical obliteration of the maxillary sinus. A clinical and experimental study.

Authors:  R A McNeill
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Frontal sinus disease: 100 cases treated by osteoplastic operation.

Authors:  R D Zonis; W W Montgomery; R L Goodale
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Frontal sinus disease. III. Experimental and clinical factors in failure of the frontal osteoplastic operation.

Authors:  N L Schenck
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Posterior table fractures of the frontal sinus: I. An experimental study.

Authors:  R L Hybels; M H Newman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic management of frontal sinus diseases after frontal craniotomy: a case series and review of the literature.

Authors:  F M Crocetta; P Farneti; G Sollini; A Castellucci; A Ghidini; M C Spinosi; I J Fernandez; M Zoli; D Mazzatenta; E Pasquini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.503

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.