| Literature DB >> 25891006 |
Steve Schey1, Sarah R Brown2, Avie-Lee Tillotson2, Kwee Yong3, Cathy Williams4, Faith Davies5, Gareth Morgan5, Jamie Cavenagh6, Gordon Cook7, Mark Cook8, Guillermo Orti1, Curly Morris9, Debbie Sherratt2, Louise Flanagan2, Walter Gregory2, James Cavet10.
Abstract
There is a significant unmet need in effective therapy for relapsed myeloma patients once they become refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide. While data from the front line setting suggest bendamustine is superior to melphalan, there is no information defining optimal bendamustine dose in multiply-treated patients. We report a multi-centre randomized two-stage phase 2 trial simultaneously assessing deliverability and activity of two doses of bendamustine (60 mg/m2 vs. 100 mg/m2) days 1 and 8, thalidomide (100 mg) days 1-21 and low dose dexamethasone (20 mg) days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-d cycle. Ninety-four relapsing patients were treated on trial, with a median three prior treatment lines. A pre-planned interim deliverability and activity assessment led to closure of the 100 mg/m2 arm due to excess cytopenias, and led to amendment of entry criteria for cytopenias. Non-haematological toxicities including thromboembolism and neurotoxicity were infrequent. In the 60 mg/m2 arm, treatment was deliverable in 61.1% subjects and the partial response rate was 46.3% in the study eligible population, with 7.5 months progression-free survival. This study demonstrates bendamustine at 60 mg/m2 twice per month with thalidomide and dexamethasone is deliverable for repeated cycles in heavily pre-treated myeloma patients and has substantial clinical activity.Entities:
Keywords: bendamustine; dosing; myeloma; phase 2; relapsed-refractory
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25891006 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13435
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Haematol ISSN: 0007-1048 Impact factor: 6.998