Literature DB >> 25890793

Sources of clinical distress in young people at ultra high risk of psychosis.

Marta Rapado-Castro1, Patrick D McGorry2, Alison Yung3, Ana Calvo4, Barnaby Nelson5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Substantial controversy has been generated since the proposal to include "Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome" in DSM-5, based on research criteria used to identify young people at "ultra high risk" (UHR) for psychosis. The syndrome was ultimately included in the section for further research. The criteria specified that the person experienced attenuated psychotic symptoms (APS) that were sufficiently distressing to warrant clinical attention. Although APS are the main means of determining whether a person meets UHR criteria, clinical experience suggests that such symptoms are often not the main source of clinical distress in this patient group. However, little is known about the sources of distress in the UHR group. We aimed to assess the main sources of clinical distress in UHR patients at the time of referral to a specialized UHR clinic.
METHOD: Sources and intensity of distress in 73 UHR patients were gathered from treating clinicians. The association with transition to psychosis was explored.
RESULTS: Of the total sample, 89.04% fulfilled the APS UHR criteria. APS symptoms were reported to be distressing for 58.5% of this subsample, but social and functioning difficulties (78.1%) and depressive symptoms (58.9%) were the highest sources of distress leading UHR patients to seek help. Intensity of distress associated with APS, anxiety symptoms and substance use was associated with transition to psychosis.
CONCLUSIONS: APS were reported to be distressing for approximately half of UHR patients. The intensity of distress associated to these symptoms may be associated with increased risk for subsequent transition to full threshold psychotic disorder.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical distress; Prodrome; Psychosis; Ultra-high risk (UHR); Youth mental health

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25890793     DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  15 in total

Review 1.  Clinical high risk for psychosis in children and adolescents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jordina Tor; Montserrat Dolz; Anna Sintes; Daniel Muñoz; Marta Pardo; Elena de la Serna; Olga Puig; Gisela Sugranyes; Inmaculada Baeza
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 2.  Mental Health Services Research Targeting the Clinical High-Risk State for Psychosis: Lessons, Future Directions and Integration with Patient Perspectives.

Authors:  Sarah V McIlwaine; Jai Shah
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Major depressive disorder and attenuated negative symptoms in a child and adolescent sample with psychosis risk syndrome: the CAPRIS study.

Authors:  Marta Rodríguez-Pascual; Xavier Álvarez-Subiela; Jordina Tor; Marta Pardo; Elena de la Serna; Gisela Sugranyes; Olga Puig; Inmaculada Baeza; Montserrat Dolz
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Antipsychotics are related to psychometric conversion to psychosis in ultra-high-risk youth.

Authors:  Antonio Preti; Andrea Raballo; Anna Meneghelli; Angelo Cocchi; Maria Meliante; Simona Barbera; Lara Malvini; Emiliano Monzani; Mauro Percudani
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 5.  The role of rumination in illness trajectories in youth: linking trans-diagnostic processes with clinical staging models.

Authors:  A B Grierson; I B Hickie; S L Naismith; J Scott
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  Metacognitive beliefs as psychological predictors of social functioning: An investigation with young people at risk of psychosis.

Authors:  Measha Bright; Sophie Parker; Paul French; David Fowler; Andrew Gumley; Anthony P Morrison; Max Birchwood; Peter B Jones; Suzanne L K Stewart; Adrian Wells
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  Screening nursing students to identify those at high risk of poor mental health: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Der-Yun Hsiung; Ching-Lun Tsai; Ling-Chun Chiang; Wei-Fen Ma
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Depression, family interaction and family intervention in adolescents at clinical-high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Gabrielle R Rinne; Mary P O'Brien; David J Miklowitz; Jean M Addington; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 2.732

9.  Psychosis risk research versus daily prognosis uncertainties: A qualitative study of French youth psychiatrists' attitudes toward predictive practices.

Authors:  Laelia Benoit; Marie Rose Moro; Bruno Falissard; Nicolas Henckes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comorbid Mental Disorders and 6-Month Symptomatic and Functioning Outcomes in Chinese University Students at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.

Authors:  Jingyu Shi; Lu Wang; Yuhong Yao; Na Su; Chenyu Zhan; Ziyu Mao; Xudong Zhao
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.