Bruce J Kinon1, Brian A Millen2, Lu Zhang2, David L McKinzie2. 1. Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, Illinois. Electronic address: bkin@lundbeck.com. 2. Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence indicates that glutamatergic tone in schizophrenia may vary as a function of illness duration or medication history. We conducted an exploratory analysis of the existing clinical trial database of pomaglumetad methionil (pomaglumetad) to demonstrate treatment response in targeted patient populations. METHODS: Results of the H8Y-MC-HBBM (HBBM) study and an integrated analysis based on five placebo-controlled trials were summarized. Patients with schizophrenia were randomly assigned to receive either pomaglumetad, 40 or 80 mg twice daily (BID), placebo, or risperidone, 2 mg BID, for up to 6 weeks. Patient subgroups were analyzed to determine the efficacy of pomaglumetad treatment in patients early-in-disease (≤3 years) and late-in-disease (≥10 years) (HBBM, 40 mg, n = 206, 80 mg, n = 198; integrated analysis, 40 mg, n = 382, 80 mg, n = 381) and in patients previously treated with central nervous system drugs with prominent serotonin 2A receptor antagonist activity (S2 group) or withpredominant dopamine D2 receptor antagonist activity (D2 group; HBBM, 40 mg, n = 275, 80 mg, n = 269; integrated analysis, 40 mg, n = 590, 80 mg, n = 506). RESULTS: In the HBBM study and integrated analysis, only patients early-in-disease or previously treated with D2 drugs exhibited significantly greater improvement relative to those receiving placebo, when treated with pomaglumetad, 40 mg (but not 80 mg) BID. Treatment response to risperidone did not appear to depend upon these patient subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Demonstration of antipsychotic efficacy of a potential glutamate-based pharmacotherapy for schizophrenia may require the identification of appropriate patient subgroups whose treatment responsiveness may be fundamentally related to dysregulation of central nervous system glutamatergic tone.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence indicates that glutamatergic tone in schizophrenia may vary as a function of illness duration or medication history. We conducted an exploratory analysis of the existing clinical trial database of pomaglumetad methionil (pomaglumetad) to demonstrate treatment response in targeted patient populations. METHODS: Results of the H8Y-MC-HBBM (HBBM) study and an integrated analysis based on five placebo-controlled trials were summarized. Patients with schizophrenia were randomly assigned to receive either pomaglumetad, 40 or 80 mg twice daily (BID), placebo, or risperidone, 2 mg BID, for up to 6 weeks. Patient subgroups were analyzed to determine the efficacy of pomaglumetad treatment in patients early-in-disease (≤3 years) and late-in-disease (≥10 years) (HBBM, 40 mg, n = 206, 80 mg, n = 198; integrated analysis, 40 mg, n = 382, 80 mg, n = 381) and in patients previously treated with central nervous system drugs with prominent serotonin 2A receptor antagonist activity (S2 group) or with predominant dopamine D2 receptor antagonist activity (D2 group; HBBM, 40 mg, n = 275, 80 mg, n = 269; integrated analysis, 40 mg, n = 590, 80 mg, n = 506). RESULTS: In the HBBM study and integrated analysis, only patients early-in-disease or previously treated with D2 drugs exhibited significantly greater improvement relative to those receiving placebo, when treated with pomaglumetad, 40 mg (but not 80 mg) BID. Treatment response to risperidone did not appear to depend upon these patient subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Demonstration of antipsychotic efficacy of a potential glutamate-based pharmacotherapy for schizophrenia may require the identification of appropriate patient subgroups whose treatment responsiveness may be fundamentally related to dysregulation of central nervous system glutamatergic tone.
Authors: Lia Baki; Miguel Fribourg; Jason Younkin; Jose Miguel Eltit; Jose L Moreno; Gyu Park; Zhanna Vysotskaya; Adishesh Narahari; Stuart C Sealfon; Javier Gonzalez-Maeso; Diomedes E Logothetis Journal: Pflugers Arch Date: 2016-01-16 Impact factor: 3.657
Authors: José L Moreno; Patricia Miranda-Azpiazu; Aintzane García-Bea; Jason Younkin; Meng Cui; Alexey Kozlenkov; Ariel Ben-Ezra; Georgios Voloudakis; Amanda K Fakira; Lia Baki; Yongchao Ge; Anastasios Georgakopoulos; José A Morón; Graeme Milligan; Juan F López-Giménez; Nikolaos K Robakis; Diomedes E Logothetis; J Javier Meana; Javier González-Maeso Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: Lu E Jin; Min Wang; Veronica C Galvin; Taber C Lightbourne; Peter Jeffrey Conn; Amy F T Arnsten; Constantinos D Paspalas Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Steven T Szabo; Bruce J Kinon; Stephen K Brannan; Andrew K Krystal; Joop M A van Gerven; Atul Mahableshwarkar; Gary S Sachs Journal: Innov Clin Neurosci Date: 2015 Mar-Apr
Authors: John H Krystal; Alan Anticevic; Genevieve J Yang; George Dragoi; Naomi R Driesen; Xiao-Jing Wang; John D Murray Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Rudy Toneatti; Jong M Shin; Urjita H Shah; Carl R Mayer; Justin M Saunders; Miguel Fribourg; Paul T Arsenovic; William G Janssen; Stuart C Sealfon; Juan F López-Giménez; Deanna L Benson; Daniel E Conway; Javier González-Maeso Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: Marc S Lener; Mark J Niciu; Elizabeth D Ballard; Minkyung Park; Lawrence T Park; Allison C Nugent; Carlos A Zarate Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 13.382