| Literature DB >> 25890243 |
Tao Li1, Abraham G Eappen2, Adam M Richman3, Peter F Billingsley4, Yonas Abebe5, Minglin Li6, Debbie Padilla7, Isabel Rodriguez-Barraquer8, B Kim Lee Sim9,10, Stephen L Hoffman11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A vaccine that interrupts malaria transmission (VIMT) would be a valuable tool for malaria control and elimination. One VIMT approach is to identify sexual erythrocytic and mosquito stage antigens of the malaria parasite that induce immune responses targeted at disrupting parasite development in the mosquito. The standard Plasmodium falciparum membrane-feeding assay (SMFA) is used to assess transmission-blocking activity (TBA) of antibodies against candidate immunogens and of drugs targeting the mosquito stages. To develop its P. falciparum sporozoite (SPZ) products, Sanaria has industrialized the production of P. falciparum-infected Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes, incorporating quantitative analyses of oocyst and P. falciparum SPZ infections as part of the manufacturing process.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25890243 PMCID: PMC4491417 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-015-0665-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Figure 1Intensity of oocyst infections in a representative SMFA. The results are shown for one of 74 SMFAs conducted for this study. Each point represents the number of oocysts per mosquito and the black bar indicates the geometric mean for each group. Boxes are 95% confidence intervals around the geometric means. C is non-immune control serum (O+ human serum). NC is negative control serum (pooled pre-immune mouse serum). S1 to S6 are serum samples from animals immunized with Pfs25 immunogens.
Summary of SMFA control results
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| 47.8 ± 32.9 | 8.4 ± 8.9 | 81.6 ± 12.9 | 93.8 ± 7.2 | 81.9 ± 16.5 | 12.9 ± 16.6 |
|
| 38.1, 57.5 | 5.8, 11.1 | 77.7, 85.4 | 91.7, 96.0 | 77.0, 86.8 | 8.0, 17.8 | |
|
| 3.7, 135.6 | 0.1, 47.0 | 36.5, 98.9 | 71.4, 100.0 | 8.3, 100.0 | −8.7, 89.6 | |
|
|
| 43.7 ± 25.8 | 1.3 ± 1.6 | 97.0 ± 3.9 | 94.6 ± 4.4 | 34.6 ± 27.1 | 63.5 ± 28.6 |
|
| 34.5, 52.9 | 0.7, 1.8 | 95.6, 98.4 | 92.9, 96.3 | 24.9, 44.3 | 53.3, 73.7 | |
|
| 7.1, 106.4 | 0.0, 4.8 | 87.4, 100.0 | 84.2, 100.0 | 0, 79.2 | 10.0, 100.0 | |
|
|
| 46.1 ± 30.1 | 94.2 ± 6.3 | ||||
|
| 39.3, 52.5 | 92.7, 95.6 | |||||
|
| 3.7, 135.6 | 71.4, 100.0 | |||||
The positive and negative control data from 74 independent SMFAs are summarized to show the infection intensity and infection prevalence in mosquitoes fed negative control (human O+) serum or positive control anti-Pfs25 antibodies. Transmission blocking activities measured as effects on intensity (TBA-I) and prevalence (TBA-P) are calculated. In each SMFA there was one cage of negative control mosquitoes and one cage of positive control mosquitoes. For infection intensities, data are the arithmetic means ± standard deviation (SD) of the geometric mean intensities from each cage of negative or positive control mosquitoes as well as the 95% confidence intervals (CI) and range. For infection prevalence, data are the arithmetic means ± SD of the percent of mosquitoes infected in each cage of negative or positive control mosquitoes as wells as the 95% CI and range.
Figure 2Effect of blood meal quality on transmission blocking effect of two anti-Pfs25 monoclonal antibodies. The relationship between infection intensity (geometric mean number of oocysts) in control mosquitoes and the infection intensity (A, B) and infection prevalence (proportion of mosquitoes with oocysts) (C, D) is plotted for mosquitoes fed anti-Pfs25 antibodies, MRA39 (A, C) and MRA38 (B, D) in the infectious blood meals.
Figure 3Transmission blocking activity based on infection intensity of 188 unknown sera. Samples are arranged in rank order of TBA. Each point indicates the arithmetic mean percent TBA of two independent assays and error bars represent the range of percent TBA. (A) TBA-I. Five sera increased infection intensity and 125 sera demonstrated >90% TBA-I. There was higher variability in TBA-I between duplicate assays in samples with <70% reduction in infection intensity. (B) TBA-P. Nine sera increased infection prevalence and 101 sera demonstrated >90% TBA-P. High variability in TBA-P between duplicate assays was observed only in sera with <80% reduction in prevalence.
Frequency distribution of reductions in intensity and prevalence of oocyst stage infections in for 188 serum samples tested in SMFA
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| 100% | 31 (16.5%) | 31 (16.5%) |
| 90-99% | 94 (50.0%) | 70 (37.2%) |
| 60-89% | 38 (20.2%) | 31 (16.5%) |
| 30-59% | 17 (9.0%) | 16 (8.5%) |
| 0-29% | 3 (1.6%) | 31 (16.5%) |
| <0% | 5 (2.7%) | 9 (4.8%) |
Figure 4Relationship between intensity and prevalence of oocysts in mosquitoes fed control monoclonal antibodies and test sera. (A) MRA38 monoclonal antibody (B) MRA39 monoclonal antibody; (C, D) Negative control sera for (A) and (B) respectively; (E) Unknown experimental sera; (F) All data pooled to show consistency of relationship between the infection characteristics in all experiments. Shaded area is 95% confidence interval round the curve for the pooled data.
Results of models fit to assess different functional forms of K, the overdispersion parameter [16,31]
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Linear |
| - 3204.317 | 6412.633 |
| Power |
| - 3203.071 | 6412.142 |
| Hyperbolic |
| - 3202.466 | 6410.931 |
| Sigmoid |
| - 3202.357 | 6412.714 |
While all models fit the data similarly, the hyperbolic model was chosen as the final model based on its lowest Akaike’s information criterion (AIC).
Parameter estimates from best fitting (hyperbolic) model
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| All data | −57. 1 (−57.6, −52.1) | 12. 6 (8.0, 35.8) | 5.3 (2.3-7.9) |
| 1. | −0.10 (−60.6, 40.6) | 1. 1 (−0.03, 44.6) | 1.1 (−1.0, 12.0) |
| 2. | −5. 5 (−25.5, 1.4) | 5.1 (−0.24, 9.5) | 1.7 (0.1, 5) |
| 3. | −12.3 (−17.6, 0.6) | −105.3 (−600.5, 622.2) | 0.8 (0.4, 0.9) |
| 4. | −85.1 (−108.9, 0.4) | 19.3 (−.02, 28.0) | 5.4 (0.5, 7.4) |
| 5. | −1.8 (−15.9, 0.9) | −248.1 (−344.4, 479.5) | 0.8 (0.7, 1.0) |
Figure 5Effect of sample size on the relationship between intensity and prevalence of oocysts in mosquitoes fed control monoclonal antibodies and test sera. Experimental sera plus negative control serum and positive controls (MRA38 and MRA39) where were plotted against based on sample size of (A) ≤20 mosquitoes per sample (range = 14–20 mosquitoes per sample), (B) 21–24 mosquitoes per sample or (C) ≥25 mosquitoes per sample (range = 25–28 mosquitoes per sample). Symbols match those in Figure 4.