| Literature DB >> 25890066 |
José Manuel Alvarez-Mercado1, Froylán Ibarra-Velarde2, Miguel Ángel Alonso-Díaz3, Yolanda Vera-Montenegro4, José Guillermo Avila-Acevedo5, Ana María García-Bores6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fasciolosis due to Fasciola hepatica is the most important hepatic disease in veterinary medicine. Its relevance is important because of the major economical losses to the cattle industry such as: reduction in milk, meat and wool production; miscarriages, anemia, liver condemnation and occasionally deaths, are estimated in billons of dollars. The emergence of fluke resistance due to over or under dosing of fasciolides as well as environmental damage produced by the chemicals eliminated in field have stimulated the need for alternative methods to control Fasciola hepatica. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro anthelmintic effect of fifteen tropical plant extracts used in tradicional Mexican medicine, on newly excysted flukes of Fasciola hepatica.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25890066 PMCID: PMC4357144 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-015-0362-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
In vitro anti-fluke effectiveness of fifteen plant extracts
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| n = 10 | 100a | 100b | 0a | 0a | 0a | 0a |
|
| 100a | 100b | 0a | 0a | 0a | 100b | |
|
| 100a | 100b | 0a | 0a | 0a | 0a | |
|
| 100a | 100b | 0a | 0a | 0a | 100b | |
|
| 100a | 100b | 0a | 0a | 0a | 0a | |
|
| 100a | 100b | 0a | 10 ± 0.1a | 100b | 100b | |
|
| 100a | 100b | 0a | 7 ± 0.11a | 7 ± 0.11a | 13 ± 0.11a | |
|
| 100a | 100b | 0a | 0a | 0a | 0a | |
|
| 100a | 100b | 0a | 0a | 0a | 0a | |
|
| 100a | 100b | 0a | 0a | 0a | 0a | |
|
| 100a | 100b | 0a | 0a | 0a | 100b | |
|
| 100a | 100b | 0a | 0a | 0a | 0a | |
|
| 100a | 100b | 0a | 0a | 0a | 0a | |
|
| 100a | 100b | 0a | 0a | 0a | 0a | |
|
| 100a | 100b | 0a | 100b | 100b | 100b | |
a,bA different letter between columns indicates statistically significant differences. Significant at p < 0.05 level. Control—nil mortality.
cAverage of three replicates ± standard deviation.
dTriclabendazole, average of three replicates ± standard deviation.
eDestilled water, average of three replicates ± standard deviation.
Second assessment of anti-fluke effectiveness of five plant extracts
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| n = 10 | 100a | 100b | 0a | 93 ± 0.06b | 100a | 100a | 100a |
|
| 100a | 100b | 0a | 0a | 100b | 100b | 100b | |
|
| 100a | 100b | 0a | 0a | 0a | 93 ± 0.06b | 100b | |
|
| 100a | 100b | 0a | 0a | 0a | 83 ± 0.06b | 100b | |
|
| 100a | 100b | 0a | 0a | 0a | 93 ± 0.06b | 93 ± 0.06b | |
a,bA different letter between columns indicates statistically significant differences. Significant at p < 0.05 level. Control—nil mortality.
cAverage of three replicates ± standard deviation.
dTriclabendazole, average of three replicates ± standard deviation.
eDestilled water, average of three replicates ± standard deviation.
Figure 1Flukicide activity of plant extracts. a. Untreated control flukes. b. Flukes treated with L. camara extract 72 hrs post exposition. Dead flukes being severely affected in the tegument and internal organs. c. Flukes treated with A. mexicana extract 72 hrs post exposition. Flukes showed no motility and internal changes. d. Flukes treated with P. auritum extract 72 hrs post exposition. Flukes showed no motility and no internal changes. e. Flukes treated with C. cajan extract 72 hrs post exposition. Flukes showed no motility and no internal changes. f. Flukes treated with B. frutescens extract 72 hrs post exposition. Flukes showed no motility, but presented internal changes and litghtly affected tegument.
Lethal concentration estimates from plant extracts with anthelmintic efficacy in vitro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 92.85 | 42.16-124.50 | 210.44 | 166.78-306.78 | 410.04 | 288.46-1135.26 | ±2.197 | 5.893 |
|
| 382.73 | 327.13-444.12 | 570.09 | 479.89-908.48 | 788.9 | 603.92-1768.3 | ±3.653 | 15.258 |
|
| 369.96 | 318.77-419.83 | 529.94 | 457.78-748.36 | 710.34 | 567.74-1298.47 | ±3.813 | 14.702 |
LC50 — lethal concentration that kills 50% of the exposed flukes, LC90 — lethal concentration that kills 90% of the exposed flukes, LC99 — lethal concentration that kills 99% of the exposed flukes, UCL: upper confidence limit; LCL: lower confidence limit, SD: standard deviation. × 2 — Chi-square; df: degree of freedom. Significant at p < 0.05 level.
Results of phytochemical screening
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Phenolic compounds (FeCl3) | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | + |
| Coumarins (UV) | -- | ++ | -- | -- | + |
| Flavanones (NH3) | + Yellow | -- | + Yellow | + Yellow | + Yellow |
| Flavonoids (Shinoda) | -- | -- | + Red | + Orange | + Red |
| Sesquiterpene lactones (Baljet) | + | -- | + | + | + |
| Alkaloids (Meyer) | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| Alkaloids (Dragendorff) | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| Steroids and triterpenoids (Liberman, Burchard) | ++ | ++ | + | + | + |
| Glycosides (α-naphtol) | -- | -- | -- | -- | + |
Symbology: −− negative; + weak positive; ++ positive; +++ strong positive.