| Literature DB >> 25889654 |
Ester Grilli1, Benedetta Tugnoli2, Jade L Passey3,4, Chad H Stahl5, Andrea Piva6, Adam J Moeser7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Organic acids, such as citric and sorbic acid, and pure plant-derived constituents, like monoterpens and aldehydes, have a long history of use in pig feeding as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters. However, their effects on the intestinal barrier function and inflammation have never been investigated. Therefore, aim of this study was to assess the impact of a microencapsulated mixture of citric acid and sorbic acid (OA) and pure botanicals, namely thymol and vanillin, (PB) on the intestinal integrity and functionality of weaned pigs and in vitro on Caco-2 cells. In the first study 20 piglets were divided in 2 groups and received either a basal diet or the basal diet supplemented with OA + PB (5 g/kg) for 2 weeks post-weaning at the end of which ileum and jejunum samples were collected for Ussing chambers analysis of trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TER), intermittent short-circuit current (I SC), and dextran flux. Scrapings of ileum mucosa were also collected for cytokine analysis (n = 6). In the second study we measured the effect of these compounds directly on TER and permeability of Caco-2 monolayers treated with either 0.2 or 1 g/l of OA + PB.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25889654 PMCID: PMC4483210 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-015-0410-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Primers used for gene expression analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| F: AGCAAGGAGGTACTGGCAGAAAACAAC | 110 | 83.5 | [NM_214399.1] | [ |
| R: GTGGTGATTCTCATCAAGCAGGTCTCC | |||||
|
| F: CGGCGCTGTCATCAATTTCTG | 89 | 85 | [NM_214041.1] | [ |
| R: CCCCTCTCTTGGAGCTTGCTA | |||||
|
| F: GCCCAGGAATGTTCAAATGCCTCA | 199 | 85.5 | [NM_213993.1] | Present study |
| R: AGGCAACTCTCATTCGTGGCTAGT | |||||
|
| F: GCCCACGTTGTAGCCAATGTCAAA | 99 | 87 | [NM_214022.1] | Present study |
| R: GTTGTCTTTCAGCTTCACGCCGTT | |||||
|
| F: AGGCCGTACTGGCTCTTTACAACA | 134 | 83.5 | [NM_214015.1] | Present study |
| R: TTGGTTGCCGCTTTCCACCATTAG | |||||
|
| F: GGCCATTCAAAGGAGCATGGATGT | 149 | 83.5 | [NM_213948.1] | Present study |
| R: TGAGTTCACTGATGGCTTTGCGCT | |||||
|
| F: TGCTGTTTCCAGATGATGTGGGCT | 198 | 90.5 | [NM_001012297.1] | Present study |
| R: TGCTGCTGCTGTTAAAGATGGACG | |||||
|
| F: GAAGAACTGGATCAGGGAAGAG | 97 | 84.5 | [NM_001104950.1] | Present study |
| R: GAATCCCAAGACACACCATCTA | |||||
|
| F: AACCAGACCCAGAAAGAGAAC | 146 | 87.5 | [NM_214326.2] | [ |
| R: TTCCGCTGCTGCTTCTTG | |||||
|
| F: CAAGAGTAACTACAACCTTC | 122 | 84 | [XM_003121741.3] | [ |
| R: GAACTCTACGATGAATCTTC |
Abbreviations: F = forward primer, R = reverse primer, Tm = melting temperature, IL-6 = interleukin-6, IL-10 = interleukin-10, IL-12 = interleukin-12, TNF-α = tumor necrosis factor-α, TGF-β = transforming growth factor-β, IFN-γ = interferon-γ, SGLT-1 = sodium/glucose co-transporter-1, CFTR = cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, RPL35 = ribosomal protein L35, RPL4 = ribosomal protein L4.
Growth performance
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BW, kg | ||||
| d0 | 7.08 | 7.15 | 0.07 | 0.91 |
| d7 | 8.08 | 8.01 | 0.08 | 0.57 |
| d14 | 8.46 | 9.13 | 0.21 | 0.049 |
| ADG, g/d | ||||
| 0 to 7d | 136.8 | 127.4 | 11.7 | 0.59 |
| 7 to 14d | 191.6 | 286.9 | 29.6 | 0.049 |
| 0 to 14d | 95.9 | 143.6 | 14.8 | 0.049 |
Control = basal diet; OA + PB = basal diet + mixture of organic acids and pure botanicals at 5 g/kg.
BW = body weight; ADG = average daily gain.
Figure 1Ussing chamber analysis of jejunum and ileum. Values are least square means (n = 6) and SEM represented by vertical bars. TER = trans-epithelial electrical resistance (Ω · cm2); FD4 flux = mucosal-to-serosal FITC-dextran flux (mg/cm2/min); I SC = short-circuit current (μA/cm2). Control = basal diet; OA + PB = basal diet + mixture of organic acids and pure botanicals at 5 g/kg.
Figure 2Gene expression of inflammatory cytokines, SGLT-1 and CFTR in ileal mucosa. Values are least square means (n = 6) and SEM represented by vertical bars. Within a gene, columns with symbols are different: * = P < 0.05; ** = P < 0.01. A modification of the 2–ΔΔC T method was used to analyze the relative expression (fold changes), calculated relative to the control group (control), [17]. Control = basal diet; OA + PB = basal diet + mixture of organic acids and pure botanicals at 5 g/kg.
Figure 3Protein levels of inflammatory cytokines in ileal mucosa. Values are least square means (n = 6) and SEM represented by vertical bars. Data refer to picograms of cytokine per 100 milligrams of tissue (pg/100 mg) measured using ELISA method. Control = basal diet; OA + PB = basal diet + mixture of organic acids and pure botanicals at 5 g/kg.
Figure 4Protein levels of inflammatory cytokines in serum at d0, d7, and d14. Values are least square means (n = 6) and SEM represented by vertical bars. Within a time-point (d0, d7, or d14) columns with symbols are different: * = P < 0.05; ** = P < 0.01. Data refer to picograms of cytokine per milliliter of serum (pg/ml) measured using ELISA method. Control = basal diet; OA + PB = basal diet + mixture of organic acids and pure botanicals at 5 g/kg.
Figure 5Trans-epithelial resistance of Caco-2 cells grown with 0.2 g/l or 1 g/l of OA + PB. Data in the graph are means (n = 7) and SEM represented by vertical bars. Superscript “a” means that at each time point 0.2 g/l was different from control, whereas “b” means that 1 g/l was different from control.
Figure 6FD4 flux change of Caco-2 cells grown with 0.2 g/l or 1 g/l of OA + PB. Values are means (n = 7) and SEM represented by vertical bars.