Literature DB >> 25889605

Lessons learned from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident: efficient education items of radiation safety for general public.

K Ohno1, K Endo2.   

Abstract

The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant (FNP-1) accident, while as tragic as the tsunami, was a man-made disaster created by the ignorance of the effects of radiation and radioactive materials. Therefore, it is important that all specialists in radiation protection in medicine sympathize with the anxiety of the general public regarding the harmful effects of radiation and advise people accordingly. All questions and answers were collected related to inquiries from the general public that were posted to reliable websites, including those of the government and radiation-related organizations, from March 2011 to November 2012. The questions were summarized and classified by similarity of content. (1) The total number of questions is 372. The content was broadly classified into three categories: inquiries for radiation-related knowledge and about health effects and foods. The questions asked to obtain radiation-related knowledge were the most common, accounting for 38 %. Thirty-six percentage of the questions were related to health effects, and 26 % involved foods, whereas 18 % of the questions were related to children and pregnancy. (2) The change over time was investigated in 290 questions for which the time of inquiry was known. Directly after the earthquake, the questions were primarily from people seeking radiation-related knowledge. Later, questions related to health effects increased. The anxiety experienced by residents following the nuclear accident was caused primarily by insufficient knowledge related to radiation, concerns about health effects and uncertainties about food and water safety. The development of educational materials focusing on such content will be important for risk communication with the general public in countries with nuclear power plants. Physicians and medical physicist should possess the ability to respond to questions such as these and should continue with medical examinations and treatments in a safe and appropriate manner.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25889605     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  3 in total

Review 1.  Risk Communication Strategies: Lessons Learned from Previous Disasters with a Focus on the Fukushima Radiation Accident.

Authors:  Erik R Svendsen; Ichiro Yamaguchi; Toshihide Tsuda; Jean Remy Davee Guimaraes; Martin Tondel
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2016-12

2.  Level of perception of technical terms regarding the effect of radiation on the human body by residents of Japan.

Authors:  Yoshitoku Yoshida; Yasuko Yoshida; Emiko Isogai; Takashi Hayase; Kozue Nakamura; Mitsuo Saito; Koji Arizono
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.674

3.  Association of Anxiety over Radiation Exposure and Acquisition of Knowledge Regarding Occupational Health Management in Operation Leader Candidates of Radioactivity Decontamination Workers in Fukushima, Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Tomoo Hidaka; Takeyasu Kakamu; Shota Endo; Hideaki Kasuga; Yusuke Masuishi; Tomohiro Kumagai; Sei Sato; Takuma Sasaki; Tetsuhito Fukushima
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.