Literature DB >> 25889141

Update on indoor tanning legislation in the United States.

Michael Pan1, Lauren Geller2.   

Abstract

The incidence of melanoma has been increasing over the past several decades, with notable increases in the pediatric and adolescent population. Indoor tanning has been proven carcinogenic and is associated with an increased risk of melanoma, especially when used at a young age. The incidence and frequency of usage of indoor tanning in the United States is high, particularly among adolescents, with roughly 20% reporting using a tanning bed at least once. The Food and Drug Administration recently made changes to its regulation of indoor tanning devices, reclassifying them as class II devices necessitating stricter premarket review, and strengthened its warnings for these devices; however, federal regulation of indoor tanning is still limited and most regulation of indoor tanning in minors is done on a state-by-state basis. Three types of legislation exist: (1) absolute ban on minor use of indoor tanning devices, (2) age restriction of minor usage of indoor tanning devices other than age 18 years, and (3) requirement of parental consent. These regulations are inconsistent, and enforcement efforts are often limited. In this contribution, we provide an update on the prevalence of indoor tanning, the risks associated with indoor tanning, and the current federal and state legislation and enforcement efforts in the United States with regard to indoor tanning. Although efforts are being made to ban all use of indoor tanning devices by minors, there is still more work to be done before this becomes a reality in the United States.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25889141     DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2014.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Dermatol        ISSN: 0738-081X            Impact factor:   3.541


  7 in total

1.  The urgent need to ban youth indoor tanning: evidence from college undergraduates.

Authors:  Casey L Daniel; Jennifer L Hay; Brooke Foucault Welles; Alan C Geller
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Effect of Legislation on Indoor Tanning Prevalence in Alabama.

Authors:  Aaron J Blashill; Sherry Pagoto
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Support for indoor tanning policies among young adult women who indoor tan.

Authors:  Darren Mays; Sarah E Murphy; Rachel Bubly; Michael B Atkins; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  A Web-Based Intervention to Reduce Indoor Tanning Motivations in Adolescents: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Joel Hillhouse; Rob Turrisi; Nichole M Scaglione; Michael J Cleveland; Katie Baker; L Carter Florence
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2017-02

5.  State Indoor Tanning Laws and Prevalence of Indoor Tanning Among US High School Students, 2009-2015.

Authors:  Jin Qin; Dawn M Holman; Sherry Everett Jones; Zahava Berkowitz; Gery P Guy
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Choctaw Nation Youth Sun Exposure Survey.

Authors:  Dorothy A Rhoades; Martina Hawkins; Barbara Norton; Dannielle Branam; Tamela K Cannady; Justin Dvorak; Kai Ding; Ardis L Olson; Mark P Doescher
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2017-04-28

7.  Epidemiology of Keratinocyte Carcinoma.

Authors:  David M Perry; Virginia Barton; Anthony J Alberg
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2017-05-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.