Literature DB >> 25888471

Mode of delivery and level of neonatal care in Lombardy: a descriptive analysis according to volume of care.

Fabio Parazzini1,2, Sonia Cipriani3, Giuseppe Bulfoni4, Camilla Bulfoni5, Roberto Bellù6, Rinaldo Zanini7, Fabio Mosca8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Using data from the Hospital Discharge data-base (SDO) and from the Certificate of Delivery Assistance data-base (CedAP) we analysed mode of delivery and neonatal care in public and private hospitals in Lombardy Region during 2012.
METHODS: In Lombardy a standard form is used to register all discharges from public or private hospitals (the SDO data-base which contained information on inpatient activity provided to each patient by any hospital or clinic included in the Regional Health System. Further, information on maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcome are available for all deliveries in CedAP data-base. We obtained data regarding all deliveries (mother discharge data-base M-SDO)and newborns discharge (N-SDO) and the CedAP data-base over the period January-December 2012 by the Lombardy Health Directorate. After linkage (using an anonymous key) of the three data-base using anonymized codes we obtained a data-base by the linkage of CedAP and N-SDO records, which includes, after elimination of incorrect codes, information on 90863 neonates and a data-base obtained by the linkage of CedAP and M-SDO records, which includes information on 90868 mother and deliveries. Using these data-base we have analysed mode of delivery and neonatal care in Lombardy according to the volume of care (VoC = number of delivery per year in the care unit).
RESULTS: In 2012, in Lombardy, less than 3% of newborns were born in hospitals reporting less than 500 deliveries/year and less than 30% in hospitals reporting < 1000 deliveries per year. Cesarean section rate was higher in units reporting less than 1000 deliveries/year (28.7% versus 27.5% in hospitals with more than 1000 deliveries/year). In hospitals reporting 500, 500-799, 800-999 deliveries/year the percentage of preterm births with gestational age <33 weeks ranged from 0.1% to 0.2%, but was 3.4% in hospitals reporting 2500 deliveries per year or more. A total of 0.6% of newborns weighing less than 1000 grams and 3.2% of newborns with birth weight between 1000 and 1499 grams was born in hospitals which reported 1000 deliveries or more.
CONCLUSIONS: This article provides an overview of delivery and neonatal care in the Lombardy Region with a focus on volume of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25888471      PMCID: PMC4477540          DOI: 10.1186/s13052-015-0129-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ital J Pediatr        ISSN: 1720-8424            Impact factor:   2.638


Introduction

In the last years a large debate has revolved around obstetric and neonatal care organization, focused on medical aspects and the costs of assistance. In particular, the effect of volume of obstetric and neonatal care on outcomes and costs has been object of a large debate [1-4]. Regionalization of health care may improve care by directing patients to facilities with the appropriate skill to manage high risk conditions, without increasing costs [2,5]. For example, an US study has suggested that there is benefit to neonatal outcomes when high-risk infants are delivered in hospitals with neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with high volume of care (VoC) (see Method for definition). This effect, however, differs between states, which may be attributable to different methods of regionalization [1]. Further it has been shown that concentration of high risk deliveries in a smaller number of hospitals has the potential to decrease neonatal mortality without increasing costs [2]. In recent years the availability of administrative data-bases has offered the opportunity of evaluating obstetric and neonatal care on a regional or local basis [6]. Since 1991, a standard form was used to collect information on all discharges from public or private hospitals in Lombardy. These data were available in the Hospital Discharge Data-base (SDO). More recently, the availability of data from all deliveries included in the Certificate of Delivery Assistance data-base (CedAP) has offered the opportunity to integrate the two sources of data to obtain a more detailed information about delivery and neonatal care in the Region. Using these data we analysed the obstetric and neonatal assistance in public and private hospitals in Lombardy in 2012 according to the VoC of the obstetric/neonatal units. In Lombardy only second level centres (see Methods for definition) are allowed to delivery gestational ages <34 weeks.

Methods

Since 1991, a standard form was used to register all discharges from public or private hospitals in Lombardy. Data were available in the SDO data-base which contained information on inpatient activity provided to each patient by any hospital or clinic included in the Regional Health System (RHS). The RHS provided reimbursement for hospital admissions to each Regional hospital. On the basis of this information the healthcare providers (both public and private) were reimbursed by the RHS for the services delivered to each patient. Detailed information regarding maternal characteristics, single and multiple births, pregnancies after assisted reproductive techniques (ART), fetus presentation at delivery, gestational age at birth, induction of labour and mode of delivery, were available for all deliveries in CedAP data-base. We obtained data regarding all deliveries and neonatal admissions from these two data-base over the period January-December 2012 by the Lombardy Health Directorate. Due to discrepancies in the data-base period of reference (date of delivery in the CeDAP data-base and date of discharge in the SDO obstetric and neonatal data-base) some numerical differences emerged between the two data-base. CeDAP data-base included 91655 deliveries and 93244 births (93005 newborns, 239 stillborns). SDO data-base concerning newborns discharge (N-SDO) included 91830 records about neonates discharged in 2012. SDO data-base concerning mothers discharge (M-SDO) included 90868 records about women discharged in 2012. After linkage of the three data-base using anonymized codes we obtained: A data-base obtained by the linkage of CedAP and N-SDO records, which includes, after elimination of incorrect codes, information on 90863 neonates; A data-base obtained by the linkage of CedAP and M-SDO records, which includes information on 90868 mother and deliveries. From the SDO data-base, data related to patient hospitalization, diagnosis and discharge were extracted. From the CedAP data-base, information about maternal characteristics, single and multiple births, pregnancies obtained with ART, fetus presentation at delivery, gestational age at birth and mode of delivery, were extracted. Information regarding analgesia during labour were obtained from the M-SDO data-base. Data-base obtained from CeDAP and M-SDO record linkage was used for the analysis of mode of delivery. Data-base obtained from CeDAP and N-SDO record linkage was used to analyse newborns characteristics. To verify consistency of data contained in SDO and CedAP records, birth weight values reported in both data-base were compared. In 92.0% of cases no difference was observed. In 6.0% of cases the difference was less than 100 g. Only in 0.7% of cases a difference greater than 500 g was observed. According to the regional law we defined “Level I” care unit those reporting <1000 deliveries/year; “Level II” those reporting 1000 or more deliveries, with or without neonatal intensive care. All the analyses were carried out using SAS/STAT, version 9.2 software (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Table 1 showed the distribution of 74 obstetric/neonatal units of the RHS according to the VoC.
Table 1

Distribution of obstetric/neonatal units according to volume of care (number of deliveries/year)

Volume of care Hospitals (N = 74) Deliveries N = 91601
N % N %
<5001013.526762.9
500-7992027.01260813.8
800-9991114.9996510.9
1000-24992533.83786041.3
≥2500810.82849231.1
Distribution of obstetric/neonatal units according to volume of care (number of deliveries/year) 40.5% of the obstetric/neonatal care units reported less than 800 deliveries: in these centres only 16.7% of newborns were delivered. A total of 28492 deliveries (31.1%) occurred in 8 centres reporting more than 2500 deliveries. The mean maternal age at birth was 32.4 years (range 14–54). In particular, it was 31.5 years for the first, 32.7 years for the second, 33.8 years for the third, 35.0 years for the fourth born or more. In 9.0% of births maternal age was ≥ 40 years. Mother was foreigner in 26351 deliveries (28.8%). ART was reported in 2264 (2.5%) deliveries. A total of 1555 multiple deliveries occurred (3156 newborns (3.4%)). Of these, 3044 (3.3%) were twin deliveries, 96 (0.1%) triplets and 4 (0.004%) quadruplets. Finally, 4.5% of births were recorded with breech or other abnormal presentations. During the 2012 caesarean section rate was 27.8%. Vacuum was reported in 6.2% of deliveries. Eleven point six percent of births were recorded in women who reported one or more previous caesarean sections (7.9% one, 1.2% two and 0.2% 3 or more previous caesarean section). Vaginal birth after caesarean section occurred in 18.1% of cases. Cesarean section rate was higher in units reporting less than 1000 deliveries per year (Table 2).
Table 2

Mode of delivery according to the volume of care (number of deliveries/year in the care unit)

Volume of care Deliveries Vaginal delivery Cesarean section Induced labour CS after induction Women with previous CS Vaginal after CS (VBAC)
Total vaginal delivery Normal vaginal delivery Vacuum Forceps Total CS Elective CS Emergency CS
N N %* N %* N %* N N % N %* N % N %* N %** N %* N. %***
<5002676174965.4162260.61274.7192634.660465.232234.862823.512419.743216.1286.5
500-79912608874669.4826865.64783.81386130.6198751.5187448.5240019.061725.7160012.717811.1
800-9999965750075.3704870.74524.50246524.7146559.4100040.6175717.634719.7112111.218916.9
1000-2499378602790173.72622869.316734.40995926.3445644.7550355.3702320.3137719.6416611.076118.3
≥2500284922023671.01889166.313454.70825628.9368144.6457555.4564219.8108719.3329811.676223.1
Total916016613272.26205767.740754.422546727.81219347.91327452.11745019.8355220.41061711.6191818.1

*Row percentage of total number of deliveries in the volume of care category.

**Row percentage of total number of deliveries in the volume of care category excluding missing data on induction information (n = 3286).

***Row percentage of deliveries of women with previous CS.

CS = Cesarean section.

Mode of delivery according to the volume of care (number of deliveries/year in the care unit) *Row percentage of total number of deliveries in the volume of care category. **Row percentage of total number of deliveries in the volume of care category excluding missing data on induction information (n = 3286). ***Row percentage of deliveries of women with previous CS. CS = Cesarean section. Labours were induced in 17450 cases (19.8%). Among those, a caesarean section was reported in the 20.4% of cases. No significant differences were observed in the frequency of induction and caesarean section after induction according to volume of care. Analgesia in labour was performed in 21.1% of vaginal deliveries. A percentage higher than 25% was observed in 22 centres with no particular differences between volume of care (data not shown). Table 3 shows the distribution of births by gestational week at birth and volume of care.
Table 3

Gestational week at delivery according to the volume of the obstetric/neonatal unit

N. of deliveries per year Gestational week at delivery
<22 22-29 30-33 34-36 ≥37 Total
N %* N %* N %* N %* N %* N
<5000--30.160.2983.7257696.02683
500-7990--30.0180.15274.21211295.712660
800-9990--130.1210.24634.6953695.010033
1000-2499130.02260.66141.623016.03526891.838422
≥2500130.03011.06652.319006.52627490.129153
Totale260.05460.613241.452895.78576692.392951

*Row percentage.

Gestational week at delivery according to the volume of the obstetric/neonatal unit *Row percentage. The percentage of births ranged from 0.1% to 0.2% in units reporting less than 500, 500–799 and 800–999 deliveries, but was 3.3% in units reporting 2500 deliveries or more. A total of 291 newborns (0.3%) weighing less than 1000 grams, and 584 (0.6%) between 1000 and 1499 grams was reported. Birth weight greater than 4000 grams was recorded in 4889 cases (5.4%). Table 4 showed the distribution of births by birth weight according to volume of care: 0.6% of newborns weighing less than 1000 grams and 3.2% of those with birth weight ranging between 1000 and 1499 grams was born in hospitals reporting 1000 births or more.
Table 4

Birth at weight according to the volume of care (number of deliveries per year in the care unit)

N. of deliveries per year Weight at birth (g)
<1000 1000-1499 1500-1999 2000-2499 2500-3999 ≥4000
No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %
<50000.071.2121.0892.022082.81102.2
500-79910.330.5383.146810.61121314.173715.1
800-99910.391.5554.53688.8880611.157711.8
1000-249912041.225243.254545.0187842.23283241.3206042.1
≥250016958.131353.656046.3160336.42442430.7140528.7
Totale2910.35840.612101.344064.87948387.548895.4
Birth at weight according to the volume of care (number of deliveries per year in the care unit) A total of 160 (0.2%) newborns reported an Apgar’s score <5 at 5 minutes. Of those 7 were observed in units reporting less than 500 deliveries. Table 5 showed the distribution of births according to level of care.
Table 5

Distribution of births by care unit level

Level I Level II Level II NICU
N % N % N %
2502927.31898120.74782052.1

NICU = Neonatal intensive care unit.

Distribution of births by care unit level NICU = Neonatal intensive care unit. A total of 0.8% of newborns were admitted to another hospital after birth. A respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) was reported in 1123 births (1.2%) (Table 6).
Table 6

Frequency of Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) according to birth weight

Weight at birth (g )
Total deliveries <1000 1000-1499 1500-1999 2000-2499 2500-3999 ≥4000
N %* N %* N %* N %* N %* N %* N %*
Births with RDS11231.228196.632655.822118.31282.91600.270.1

*Percentage of total deliveries in the birth weight category.

Frequency of Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) according to birth weight *Percentage of total deliveries in the birth weight category.

Discussion

The results of this analysis provided a global view of delivery and neonatal care in Lombardy in 2012 in units with low and high level of care. Our data cannot be considered totally representative of all deliveries. In fact some deliveries and infants have not been included due to lack of link between SDO and CedAP data. This is a limitation of this analysis: excluded infants could be systematically different from the total population. With regard to quality of diagnosis, for administrative reasons, all medical records are reviewed and diagnosis are confirmed by local medical officers. Among the strengths, we also have to consider the population-based design and the opportunity to analyse temporal trends using similar methods of data collection. In Lombardy currently less than 3% of newborns are delivered in units reporting less than 500 deliveries/year and less than 30% in units reporting less than 1000 deliveries/year. These findings were lower than national ones. In Italy, in 2010, the 7.1% of babies were born in centres reporting 500 or less deliveries/year and 32.1% in centres reporting <1000 deliveries/year [7]. In 2012 in Lombardy 2.5% deliveries occurred in women who underwent ART. This frequency is steadily increasing [8]. These pregnancies were characterized by a high frequency of low birth weight (birth weight ≤1500 grams): 156/1013 (15.4%) of births with a birth weight less than 1500 grams were observed in women who underwent ART (data not shown). During 2012 breech or abnormal fetus presentation at delivery were detected in 4.5% of newborn. This frequency was 3.5% during 2002. This increase could be explained by higher maternal age and higher frequency of pregnancies after ART both recognised risk factors for breech or abnormal presentation [9,10]. A goal of present study was to describe mode of delivery and burden of neonatal care, using gestational age and birth weight as indicator of high care level. Caesarean section rate in 2012 in the Lombardy Region was 27.8%. This frequency was decreasing in comparison with previous years [11]. This recent trend is partially due to the increasing frequency of vaginal deliveries after caesarean section. In Lombardy, the percentage was 18.1% in 2012, but 7.3% in 2002 and 6.9% in 2008. In 15 centres the frequency of vaginal delivery was 20% or more in women with previous caesarean section (data not shown). Health care units offering more delivery services were assumed to provide better quality of care and one of the indicators of good quality of care is a low frequency of CS. It has been suggested that, after taking into account the level of mothers’ risk of CS, significant differences in risk-adjusted CS rates in the below-average- and medium-risk groups are present between low- and high-volume hospitals [12]. In our analysis the CS rates were higher in small units. This finding may be explained, at least in part, by the lack of 24 hours anestesiological facilities in these units. Similar findings also emerged in an analysis referred to 2009 [13]. Regionalization may prevent high risk deliveries in low volume units leaving only low risk women to delivery safely in these units. In Australia, lower hospital volume was not associated with adverse outcomes for low risk women [14]. We analysed if regionalization directed patients to facilities with the appropriate capabilities to manage low birth weight newborns. Newborns with low gestational age were rarely observed in units with low volume of care (<1000 deliveries/year). In fact, only 57 newborns with a gestational age less than 34 weeks of gestation were born in 2012 in these units and only 0.8% of all newborns were transferred to another hospital after birth. Level I neonatal care units delivered almost exclusively low risk pregnancies at term. Along this line, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) has been reported in about 1% of the N-SDO data-base records. In newborns with birth weight less than 2000 grams 828 (39.7%) presented RDS. In conclusion, the present article provided an overview about delivery and neonatal care in Lombardy Region. The analysis of administrative regional [8,11,15,16] and national [7] data-base were useful to improve care. A continuous monitoring of regional and national practice and the improvement of the quality of data collection, will be in the next years a powerful analytical tool for the identification of care priorities.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Planned Caesarean section for term breech delivery.

Authors:  G J Hofmeyr; M E Hannah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

2.  The differential impact of delivery hospital on the outcomes of premature infants.

Authors:  Scott A Lorch; Michael Baiocchi; Corinne E Ahlberg; Dylan S Small
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Does size matter? A population-based study of birth in lower volume maternity hospitals for low risk women.

Authors:  Sally K Tracy; Elizabeth Sullivan; Hannah Dahlen; Deborah Black; Yueping Alex Wang; Mark B Tracy
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 4.  The regionalization of pediatric health care.

Authors:  Scott A Lorch; Sage Myers; Brendan Carr
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Assisted fertilization and breech delivery: risks and obstetric management.

Authors:  Liv Bente Romundstad; Pål R Romundstad; Arne Sunde; Vidar von Düring; Rolv Skjaerven; Lars J Vatten
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Temporal trends in adolescent pregnancies in Lombardy, Italy: 1996-2010.

Authors:  Fabio Parazzini; Elena Ricci; Sonia Cipriani; Tiziano Motta; Francesca Chiaffarino; Matteo Malvezzi; Giuseppe Bulfoni
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Temporal trends and determinants of peripartum hysterectomy in Lombardy, Northern Italy, 1996-2010.

Authors:  Fabio Parazzini; Elena Ricci; Sonia Cipriani; Francesca Chiaffarino; Renata Bortolus; Vito Chiantera; Giuseppe Bulfoni
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.344

8.  The effects of patient volume and level of care at the hospital of birth on neonatal mortality.

Authors:  C S Phibbs; J M Bronstein; E Buxton; R H Phibbs
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-10-02       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Level and volume of neonatal intensive care and mortality in very-low-birth-weight infants.

Authors:  Ciaran S Phibbs; Laurence C Baker; Aaron B Caughey; Beate Danielsen; Susan K Schmitt; Roderic H Phibbs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Evaluating maternity care using national administrative health datasets: how are statistics affected by the quality of data on method of delivery?

Authors:  Hannah E Knight; Ipek Gurol-Urganci; Tahir A Mahmood; Allan Templeton; David Richmond; Jan H van der Meulen; David A Cromwell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  2 in total

1.  Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Medina Braha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; David C Goodman; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Are birth outcomes in low risk birth cohorts related to hospital birth volumes? A systematic review.

Authors:  Mario Rüdiger; Jochen Schmitt; Felix Walther; Denise Kuester; Anja Bieber; Jürgen Malzahn
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.