Literature DB >> 25888354

Use of electronic cigarettes among Romanian university students: a cross-sectional study.

Lucia Maria Lotrean1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because electronic cigarettes are relatively new, data on usage patterns and factors which influence them are sparse. Hence, this study aims at assessing awareness, beliefs about electronic cigarettes and experimentation with them among university students from Romania- a country where the sales and marketing of these products are widespread. Secondly, correlates of electronic cigarette experimentation will also be investigated.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed by means of anonymous questionnaires among 480 students, aged 19-24, from Cluj-Napoca, Romania, between April-May 2013.
RESULTS: The results show that 92.5% of the students have heard about e-cigarettes; out of these, one quarter (53.3% of the smokers, 25% of the ex-smokers, 5.5% of the non-smokers) have tried electronic cigarettes at least once during lifetime. The results of the multinomial logistic regression point out that the correlates of electronic cigarette experimentation were: male gender, being a smoker of traditional cigarettes, having friends who experimented with electronic cigarettes, having stronger beliefs that electronic cigarettes could help them quit smoking and being less convinced that they are used only by smokers. The explained variance was 59%.
CONCLUSIONS: The results underline the importance of addressing the issue of e-cigarette use through health education programs and regulatory interventions, since e-cigarettes are a reality faced by the Romanian youth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25888354      PMCID: PMC4414446          DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1713-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


Background

Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are battery powered devices that convert nicotine containing liquid into a vapor that can be inhaled. In the last years they have been spread and advertised in several countries as a safe nicotine delivery device that can satisfy smokers’ addiction to both nicotine and smoking behaviors, reducing their risk of disease and increasing their chances of quitting smoking [1-3]. The opponents believe that e-cigarettes should undergo clinical trials to prove their safety and their efficacy in quitting smoking, like in the case of other therapeutic products. Concerns have been also raised that e-cigarettes will undermine efforts to denormalize smoking and, as they are novelty gadgets with a low perceived risk, they may be attractive to the youth, leading to nicotine addiction and subsequent tobacco use [1-4]. Because of these concerns, e-cigarettes were banned in some countries such as Canada and Australia [5]. However, in several European countries, such as Romania, e-cigarettes are legal. Moreover, they are heavily marketed and their sale and promotion is not restricted by any regulation [6,7]. Because e-cigarettes are relatively new, data on usage patterns are sparse [1-4]. Hence, this study aims at assessing awareness, beliefs about e-cigarettes and experimentation with them among university students from Romania. Secondly, correlates of e-cigarette experimentation will also be investigated.

Method

Design and instruments

A cross-sectional study was conducted between April-May 2013 in Cluj-Napoca, a town with approximately 330,000 inhabitants from North-West Romania. The study is part of a research grant which was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy from Cluj-Napoca, Romania. The study subjects were university students, aged 19–24, from 8 dorms belonging to the 4 main universities of the town (the total number of students attending these universities was 66150). A number of 60 girls and 60 boys living in the selected dorms were chosen from each university. The selection of students was made by randomly choosing two participants/room from 30 different rooms of each dorm (dorms had rooms with 2–4 students living in each room). The participants were informed that their participation in the study was voluntary and were asked to fill in an anonymous questionnaire. The refusal rate was 5.6%. Students who refused to participate were replaced with students from the same university, living in the same dorm. The study sample consisted of 480 students, representing 0.72% of the total number of students attending the 4 universities. The questionnaire assessed socio-demographic characteristics (age, gender), awareness and beliefs about e-cigarettes, their use during one’s lifetime and reasons for using them, e-cigarettes use in the last month, intention to use them in the next year and experimentation with e-cigarettes by friends, parents and siblings. Smoking behaviour was evaluated, too; the persons who had been smoking traditional cigarettes in the last month were defined as smokers, those who had smoked in the past but not in the last month were considered ex-smokers and students who had never smoked traditional cigarettes were non-smokers. The intention to quit smoking in the future was also investigated among smokers.

Analyses

The sample of this study is represented by students who have heard about e-cigarettes (N = 444). Multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the correlates of e-cigarette experimentation among the whole study sample and among smokers. The dependent variable was experimentation with e-cigarettes (never vs tried e-cigarettes at least once during lifetime; reference were considered those who never experimented with e-cigarettes).The independent variables included as forced entry terms were: age, gender, smoking behavior (0 = non-smoker, 1 = ex-smoker, 2 = smoker), beliefs about e-cigarettes (E-cigarettes could help people quit smoking; E-cigarettes are less dangerous than traditional cigarettes; E-cigarettes are used only by smokers; the possibilities of answers were grouped in two categories - I totally disagree/I partially disagree/I do not know vs I totally agree/I partially agree), experimentation with e-cigarettes by friends, parents, siblings (no vs yes). The analyses performed among smokers also included, as independent variables, the number of traditional cigarettes smoked per day (up to one pack/day vs more than one pack/day) and intention to quit traditional smoking in the next year (yes vs no). Data analysis was performed with the SPSS-15 statistics program. Significant results are reported at p < 0.05.

Results

Awareness, beliefs and behavior

The results show that 33.8% of the students were smokers, 15.6% were ex-smokers, while 50.6% were non-smokers. A percentage of 92.5% of the students (95.1% of the smokers, 96% of the ex-smokers and 89.7% of the non-smokers) reported having heard about e-cigarettes. Table 1 shows that half of the study sample (students who were aware about e-cigarettes) believed that e-cigarettes were less dangerous than traditional cigarettes and two thirds of the students considered that e-cigarettes could help in quitting smoking. Half of the students believed that e-cigarettes were used only by smokers.
Table 1

Awareness, beliefs and behavior related to e-cigarettes experimentation

Total sample N = 444٭ % Smokers N = 154٭ % Ex-smokers N = 72٭ % Non-smokers N = 218 %
Beliefs
E-cigarettes are less dangerous
I totally agree/I partially agree55.962.333.358.7
I do not know35.835.85031.2
I totally disagree/I partially disagree8.31.916.710.1
E-cigarettes can help smokers to quit
I totally agree/I partially agree66.446.170.879.4
I do not know22.533.820.815.1
I totally disagree/I partially disagree11.120.18.35.5
E-cigarettes are used only by smokers
I totally agree/I partially agree48.951.35046.8
I do not know34.531.833.336.7
I totally disagree/I partially disagree16.616.916.716.5
Behavior
Used e-cigarettes at least once during lifetime25.253.3255.5
Used e-cigarettes in the last month2.77.800
Reasons for trying e-cigarettes among students who experimented with them٭٭
E-cigarettes are less dangerous80500
To reduce the number of traditional cigarettes000-
To quit smoking23.231.70-
Curiosity62.565.95058.3
Other friends also tried e-cigarettes23.225.6041.7
Intention to use e-cigarettes in the next year
Definitely yes/probably yes4.111.700
I do not know8.619.54.22.3
Definitely no/probably no87.368.895.897.7
Social influences
Friends have tried e-cigarettes59.767.566.751.8
Parents have tried e-cigarettes6.37.84.26.0
Siblings have tried e-cigarettes6.55.28.36.9

٭The study sample consisted of students who have ever heard about e-cigarettes.

٭٭The percentages are calculated for students who ever tried e-cigarettes (N = 82 among smokers, N = 18 among ex-smokers, N = 12 among non-smokers).

Awareness, beliefs and behavior related to e-cigarettes experimentation ٭The study sample consisted of students who have ever heard about e-cigarettes. ٭٭The percentages are calculated for students who ever tried e-cigarettes (N = 82 among smokers, N = 18 among ex-smokers, N = 12 among non-smokers). One quarter of the students who had heard about e-cigarettes (53.3% of the smokers, 25% of the ex-smokers and 5.5% of the non-smokers) declared that they had tried e-cigarettes at least once during their lifetime. 7.8% of the smokers declared having used e-cigarettes in the last month, but not the ex-smokers and non-smokers. The main reasons for ever trying e-cigarettes were curiosity and friends’ influences; one third of the smokers used them to quit smoking. Almost 60% of the study sample declared having friends who had experimented with e-cigarettes, while 6.3% of the students had parents who had done this. Intention to use e-cigarettes in the next year was declared by 11.7% of the smokers.

Correlates of e-cigarette experimentation

Table 2 presents the factors associated with electronic cigarette experimentation. The results of the multinomial logistic regression analyses show that among the whole study sample male students, the smokers and those who had friends who had experimented with e-cigarettes were more likely to try e-cigarettes. Experimentation with e-cigarettes was also more frequent among students who were more convinced about the utility of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation and among those who had weaker beliefs that e-cigarettes are used only by smokers. These variables explained 59% of the e-cigarette related behavior.
Table 2

Correlates of ever trying e-cigarettes: results of the multinomial logistic regression analyses

Total sample (N=444) b Smokers (N=154) b
Independent variables Exp(B) 95% CI Exp(B) 95% CI
Gender
Female11
Male6.29٭٭٭2.98-13.2411.99٭٭٭3.35-42.90
E-cigarettes help quitting smoking
I totally disagree/I partially disagree/I do not know11
I totally agree/I partially agree2.95٭٭1.46-5.9512.09٭٭٭3.30-44.22
E-cigarettes are less dangerous
I totally disagree/I partially disagree/I do not know11
I totally agree/I partially agree1.70٭٭٭0.91-3.193.55٭1.26-9.94
E-cigarettes are used only by smokers
I totally disagree/I partially disagree/I do not know11
I totally agree/I partially agree0.43٭٭0.23-0.790.690.26-1.84
Smoking behavior
Smoker1
Ex smoker0.09٭٭٭0.03-0.24
Non-smoker0.02٭٭٭0.01-0.04
Number of traditional cigarettes smoked/day
Maximum 1 pack/day1
>1 pack/day10.85٭٭٭2.67-44.03
Intention to quit traditional smoking within the next year
Yes1
No0.3740.12-1.15
Friends tried e-cigarettes
No11
Yes24.25٭٭٭9.55-61.558.97٭٭٭2.83-28.44
Parents tried e-cigarettes
No11
Yes0.510.15-1.700.920.21-3.87
Siblings tried e-cigarettes
No11
Yes0.410.07-2.242.300.07-6.92

aThe reference were students who did not experimented with e-cigarettes.

bThe study sample consisted of students who have ever heard about e-cigarettes.

٭p<0.05.

٭٭p<0.01.

٭٭٭p<0.001.

Correlates of ever trying e-cigarettes: results of the multinomial logistic regression analyses aThe reference were students who did not experimented with e-cigarettes. bThe study sample consisted of students who have ever heard about e-cigarettes. ٭p<0.05. ٭٭p<0.01. ٭٭٭p<0.001. Among the smokers, the correlates of trying e-cigarettes were male gender, having friends who had tried e-cigarettes, smoking higher numbers of traditional cigarettes per day and having stronger beliefs that e-cigarettes are less dangerous than traditional cigarettes and that they could help in quitting smoking. Intention to quit traditional smoking in the next year was not statistically significant associated with the experimentation of e-cigarettes. The explained variance was 55%.

Discussion

This is the first Romanian study and one of the few European studies investigating the use of e-cigarettes among young people [1-3]. The results show a high awareness and a substantial experimentation with e-cigarettes among university students in Romania - a country where the sales and marketing of these products are widespread, with no restrictions and regulations. Almost all of the students have heard about e-cigarettes, while half of the smokers, one quarter of the ex-smokers, but also 5.5% of the non-smokers have tried e-cigarettes during their lifetime. These data are similar with those from another study performed among university students from Poland [7]. On the other hand, the use of e-cigarettes in the month previous the survey was low, only 7.8% of the smokers used them, while the ex-smokers and non-smokers did not. Furthermore, the study focused on identifying factors associated with e-cigarette experimentation. Similar with the Polish study [7], among our study sample, electronic cigarette experimentation was more frequent among smokers than non-smokers, while boys were more tempted to try these products than girls. The main reasons for trying e-cigarettes declared by the students, independent of their smoking status, was curiosity to try this new product; future studies should investigate if this type of experimentation is an isolated event or if it could lead to a frequent use. The influence coming from friends was also an important reason for trying e-cigarettes mentioned by the students; the logistic regression analyses confirmed that experimentation with e-cigarettes was related to friends’ experimentation with e-cigarettes. One third of the smokers who used e-cigarettes declared that they had done this to quit smoking. The logistic regression analyses also underlined that this use of e-cigarettes among smokers was more frequent among those who smoked more traditional cigarettes/day and had stronger beliefs that e-cigarettes could help in quitting smoking. Nevertheless, similar with other studies [1,8], intention to quit smoking soon was not associated with experimentation with e-cigarettes. The study has several limitations. First, it involved only students from one big town of Romania. The study did not include a national representative sample, which limits the generalization of the results beyond its sample. Second, the sample size didn’t allow for the analysis of the data separately for boys and girls. Third, due to the cross-sectional design, the identification of causal relationship is not possible. Future studies should include a national representative sample and should focus on gender differences, too.

Conclusions

This study offers information about usage patterns of e-cigarettes and the factors which influence experimentation with e-cigarettes among Romanian university students. The results underline the importance of addressing the issue of e-cigarette use through health education programs and regulatory interventions, since e-cigarettes are a reality faced by the Romanian youth.
  6 in total

1.  Electronic cigarette use among teenagers and young adults in Poland.

Authors:  Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz; Wioleta Zielinska-Danch
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Electronic nicotine delivery systems: international tobacco control four-country survey.

Authors:  Sarah E Adkison; Richard J O'Connor; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Andrew Hyland; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; K Michael Cummings; Ann McNeill; James F Thrasher; David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Electronic cigarette use by college students.

Authors:  Erin L Sutfin; Thomas P McCoy; Holly E R Morrell; Bettina B Hoeppner; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Adolescent males' awareness of and willingness to try electronic cigarettes.

Authors:  Jessica K Pepper; Paul L Reiter; Annie-Laurie McRee; Linda D Cameron; Melissa B Gilkey; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 5.012

5.  Electronic cigarettes and thirdhand tobacco smoke: two emerging health care challenges for the primary care provider.

Authors:  Ware G Kuschner; Sunayana Reddy; Nidhi Mehrotra; Harman S Paintal
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2011-02-01

6.  Public health challenges of electronic cigarettes in South Korea.

Authors:  Sungkyu Lee; Heejin Kimm; Ji Eun Yun; Sun Ha Jee
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2011-11
  6 in total
  15 in total

1.  E-cigarettes, conventional cigarettes, and dual use in Korean adolescents and university students: Prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  Christina Jeon; Keum Ji Jung; Heejin Kimm; Sungkyu Lee; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Rob McConnell; Jonathan M Samet; Sun Ha Jee
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Prevalence and Correlates of E-Cigarette Perceptions and Trial Among Early Adolescents in Mexico.

Authors:  James F Thrasher; Erika N Abad-Vivero; Inti Barrientos-Gutíerrez; Rosaura Pérez-Hernández; Luz Miriam Reynales-Shigematsu; Raúl Mejía; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Mauricio Hernández-Ávila; James D Sargent
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Patterns of awareness and use of electronic cigarettes in Mexico, a middle-income country that bans them: Results from a 2016 national survey.

Authors:  Luis Zavala-Arciniega; Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu; Paula Lozano; Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-Andrade; Edna Arillo-Santillán; James F Thrasher
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Longitudinal Analysis of Associations Between Reasons for Electronic Cigarette Use and Change in Smoking Status Among Adults in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study.

Authors:  Eric K Soule; Andrew D Plunk; Paul T Harrell; Rashelle B Hayes; Kathryn C Edwards
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 5.  Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Allison M Glasser; Lauren Collins; Jennifer L Pearson; Haneen Abudayyeh; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams; Andrea C Villanti
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Opinions and Practices Regarding Electronic Cigarette Use among Middle School Students from Rural Areas of Romania.

Authors:  Tania Elena Tudor; Lucia Maria Lotrean
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 7.  Electronic cigarettes: what are they and what do they do?

Authors:  Alison Breland; Eric Soule; Alexa Lopez; Carolina Ramôa; Ahmad El-Hellani; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Reasons for electronic cigarette use beyond cigarette smoking cessation: A concept mapping approach.

Authors:  Eric K Soule; Scott R Rosas; Aashir Nasim
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  Patterns of electronic cigarette use in current and ever users among college students in France: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Tavolacci; Anca Vasiliu; Lucia Romo; Gayatri Kotbagi; Laurence Kern; Joël Ladner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Cigarette Smoking and Electronic Cigarettes Use: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Meng Wang; Jian-Wei Wang; Shuang-Shuang Cao; Hui-Qin Wang; Ru-Ying Hu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.