| Literature DB >> 25888309 |
Daiva Bironaite1, Dainius Daunoravicius2, Julius Bogomolovas3, Sigitas Cibiras4,5, Dalius Vitkus6, Edvardas Zurauskas7, Ieva Zasytyte8, Kestutis Rucinskas9, Siegfried Labeit10, Algirdas Venalis11, Virginija Grabauskiene12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy (iDCM) is a common debilitating disease with poor prognosis that often leads to heart failure and may require heart transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate sera and biopsy samples from chronic iDCM patients, and to investigate molecular mechanism associated with left ventricular remodeling and disease progression in order to improve therapeutic intervention.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25888309 PMCID: PMC4466865 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-015-0017-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Figure 1Immunocytochemistry of inflammatory infiltrates. (A). CD3 negative, (3 cell/mm2). (B). CD3 positive, (20 cell/mm2). (C). CD45Ro negative, (3 cell/mm2). (D). CD45Ro positive, CD45Ro (17 cell/mm2). (E). CD68 negative, (5 cell/mm2). (F). CD68 positive, (20 cell/mm2). (G). Mean of total expression of inflammatory infiltrates. Immunohistochemical illustrations are representative and obtained from one inflammatory-positive and one inflammatory-negative patient. ELISA data are presented as means ± SE from al least three independent measurements. Data were considered significant at **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.
Baseline characteristics of patients
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 10 | 8 (80%) / 2 (20%) | 22 | 17 (77%)/5 (33%) | 0.863¿ |
|
| 10 | 46.7 ± 5.87 | 22 | 42.36 ± 2.07 | 0.389 |
|
| |||||
| II | 10 | 1 (10%) | 22 | 0 (0%) | 0.132¿ |
| III | 10 | 7 (70%) | 22 | 15 (68%) | 0.918¿ |
| IV | 10 | 2 (20%) | 22 | 7 (32%) | 0.491¿ |
|
| |||||
| LBBB (%) | 10 | 3 (30%) | 22 | 5 (22.7%) | 0.659¿ |
| Permanent AF (%) | 10 | 2 (20%) | 22 | 0 (0%) | 0.000¿* |
| LVEF (%) | 10 | 24.10 ± 2.28 | 22 | 23.05 ± 1.35 | 0.678 |
| LVEDD (cm) | 10 | 6.89 ± 0.17 | 22 | 6.89 ± 0.19 | 0.998 |
| LVEDDI (cm/m2) | 10 | 3.68 ± 0.21 | 22 | 3.71 ± 0.09 | 0.847 |
| Mean Ao (mmHg) | 10 | 92.00 ± 3.95 | 22 | 86.06 ± 2.71 | 0.291 |
| Mean RAP (mmHg) | 10 | 16.22 ± 3.19 | 22 | 11.44 ± 1.74 | 0.164 |
| Mean PCWP (mmHg) | 10 | 25.00 ± 2.79 | 22 | 23.45 ± 2.70 | 0.731 |
| Mean PAP (mmHg) | 10 | 34.89 ± 4.33 | 22 | 32.95 ± 3.24 | 0.734 |
| CI (L/min/m2) | 10 | 2.38 ± 0.33 | 22 | 2.2 ± 0.14 | 0.573 |
Data are presented as the means ± SE. *Significant at 0.05 level. ¿Chi- square test. Abbreviations: NYHA – New York Heart Association functional class; LBBB – left bundle branch block; AF – atrial fibrillation; LVEF - left ventricular ejection fraction; LVEDD – left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVEDDI – left ventricular end-diastolic diameter index; Ao – aortic; RAP – right atrial pressure; PCWP – pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; PAP – pulmonary artery pressure; CI – cardiac index.
Summarized data of measured biomarkers
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||
| TNF-α (pg/mL) | 8 | 7.9313 ± 0.5106 | 21 | 14.2819 ± 5.0280 | 0.223 |
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 8 | 3.3938 ± 0.8554 | 21 | 11.4038 ± 3.3614 | 0.031 |
| IL-1β (pg/mL) | 8 | 5.0000 ± 0.0000 | 21 | 4.7619 ± 0.2381 | 0.329 |
| CRP (μg/mL) | 8 | 7.6875 ± 5.0460 | 19 | 21.5563 ± 6.9633 | 0.066 |
|
| |||||
| Bcl2 (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 0.0288 ± 0.0288 | 22 | 0.0536 ± 0.0455 | 0.889 |
| Bax (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 2.152717 ± 0.24 | 22 | 2.3354 ± 0.1606 | 0.535 |
| Caspase-9 (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 0.012955 ± 0.0013 | 22 | 0.0808 ± 0.0283 | 0.038 |
| Caspase-8 (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 0.001 ± 0.0001 | 22 | 0.0031 ± 0.0009 | 0.043 |
| Caspase-3 (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 0.0029 ± 0.0022 | 22 | 0.0105 ± 0.0023 | 0.025 |
| APO1/Fas/CD95 (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 22 | 0.00004 ± 0.00004 | 0.857 |
| FasL (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 22 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | N.A. |
| HSP60 (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 0.0419 ± 0.0253 | 22 | 0.3760 ± 0.1468 | 0.035 |
|
| |||||
| Bcl2 (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 83.5523 ± 26.2936 | 21 | 63.8790 ± 17.2137 | 0.540 |
| Bax (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 5.6452 ± 2.6905 | 21 | 6.8873 ± 3.7924 | 0.724 |
| Caspase-9 (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 29.6575 ± 12.5969 | 21 | 38.7122 ± 9.6108 | 0.950 |
| Caspase-8 (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 0.9483 ± 0.1640 | 21 | 1.1611 ± 0.1962 | 0.413 |
| Caspase-3 (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 0.2503 ± 0.0773 | 21 | 0.2586 ± 0.0649 | 0.935 |
| APO1/Fas/CD95 (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 3.4651 ± 0.6568 | 21 | 4.1921 ± 0.6607 | 0.443 |
| FasL (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 4.5550 ± 1.3594 | 21 | 4.0588 ± 1.1083 | 0.780 |
| HSP-60 (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 24.1262 ± 6.9102 | 21 | 19.2656 ± 4.5617 | 0.565 |
|
| |||||
| hsTnT (pg/mL) | 8 | 35.4988 ± 9.0908 | 20 | 66.4145 ± 26.9755 | 0.289 |
|
| |||||
| MMP9 (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 1.3867 ± 0.0674 | 22 | 1.5261 ± 0.0508 | 0.115 |
| TIMP1 (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 5.9610 ± 0.3597 | 22 | 6.1223 ± 0.1497 | 0.686 |
| MMP9/TIMP1 | 10 | 0.2355 ± 0.0090 | 22 | 0.2511 ± 0.0086 | 0.223 |
|
| |||||
| MMP9 (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 2.3698 ± 1.1931 | 21 | 2.7630 ± 0.9394 | 0.798 |
| TIMP1 (ng/mg protein) | 10 | 9.4917 ± 1.7605 | 21 | 7.8056 ± 1.4029 | 0.462 |
| MMP9/TIMP1 | 10 | 0.1931 ± 0.0729 | 21 | 0.4760 ± 0.1048 | 0.035* |
| Frequency of viral genome | 5 | 50% | 11 | 50% | |
| BNP (pg/mL) | 10 | 1277.8500 ± 428.5054 | 22 | 1603.2591 ± 276.3777 | 0.532 |
Data are presented as the means ± SE. *Significant at 0.05 level. ¡ Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney rank sum nonparametric test. Abbreviations: TNF-α - tumor necrosis factor α; IL-6 – interleukin-6; IL-1β – interleukin 1β; Bcl-2 – B-cell lymphoma 2 protein; Bax – Bcl-2–associated X protein; Hsp60 – heat shock protein 60; MMP9 – matrix metalloproteinase 9; TIMP1 – tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 1; TNF-a – tumor necrosis factor-alfa; IL-1β – interleukin 1 beta; IL-6 – interleukin 6; hs TnT – high sensitivity troponin T; CRP – C-reactive protein, BNP- B-type natriuretic protein; N.A. – not available.
Figure 2Correlation between inflammatory and mitochondrial membrane destabilization markers. (A). Correlation between serum inflammatory cytokine IL-6 and CD3. (B). Correlation between IL-6 and mitochondrial membrane stabilizing chaperone Hsp60 in serums. (C). Correlation between C-reactive protein (CRP) and Bax in serums. Correlation analysis was done by the statistical SPPS programme. Correlation was significant at a level of P <0.05. Linear regression line is presented within 95% confidence interval. Regression coefficients (R2) are shown in the graphs.
Figure 3Levels of pro-caspases-9, −8, and −3 in iDCM samples. (A). Levels of caspases in iDCM serum samples. (B). Levels of caspases in iDCM biopsies. (C). Histological estimation of necrosis in inflammation-negative EMB. (D). Histological estimation of necrosis in inflammation-positive EMB. Images are representative from one EMB of each group. Data are presented as means ± SE from at least three independent measurements. Data were considered significant at *P < 0.05.
Correlation of apoptotic, necrotic and inflammatory biomarkers in EMB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casp-8 in biopsy | 0.303 | |||||||||
| Casp-3 in biopsy | 0.063 |
| ||||||||
| Bcl2 in biopsy | −0.202 | 0.175 |
| |||||||
| FasR in biopsy | −0.097 | −0.074 |
|
| ||||||
| FasL in biopsy | −0.046 | 0.007 |
|
|
| |||||
| MMP9 in biopsy | −0.229 | 0.024 | 0.419 |
|
|
| ||||
| TIMP1 in biopsy | −0.012 | −0.205 | 0.213 |
|
|
| 0.401 | |||
| Bax in biopsy | 0.283 |
|
| 0.056 | 0.139 | 0.053 | 0.128 | −0.127 | ||
| IL-6 in serum |
| −0.016 | −0.011 | −0.262 | −0.202 | −0.154 | −0.041 | −0.227 | 0.131 | |
| hs TNT in serum | 0.434 |
|
| −0.125 | −0.067 | −0.165 | −0.120 | −0.249 |
| 0.231 |
Two tailed significance: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. Significant correlations are in bold type.
Abbreviations: Casp-3 – Caspase-3; Casp-8 – Caspase-8; Casp-9 – Caspase-9; IL-6 – Interleukin-6; Bcl-2 – B-cell lymphoma 2 protein; FasR—Fas receptor; FasL – Fas ligand; MMP9 – matrix metalloproteinase 9; TIMP1 – tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 1; Bax – Bcl-2–associated X protein; Hsp60 – heat shock protein 60; hsTnT – high sensitivity Troponin T.
Figure 4Correlation of caspase-9 with biomolecules in serum samples. Caspase-9 correlated with: (A). C-reactive protein (CRP). (B). matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9). (C). B-cell lymphoma 2 protein (Bcl-2). (D). Bcl-2–associated X protein (Bax). (E). Caspase-8. (F). Caspase-3. Correlation analysis was done by the statistical SPPS programme. Linear regression line is presented within 95% confidence interval. Regression coefficients (R2) and statistical significance (P < 0.05) are shown in the graphs.
Figure 5Correlation between caspase-8 and biomolecules in serum samples. Correlation of caspase-8 with: (A). Fas receptor (APO1/Fas/CD95). (B). Bcl-2–associated X protein (Bax). (C). Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9). Correlation analysis was done using SPPS program. Linear regression line is presented within 95% confidence interval. Coefficients of regression (R2) and statistical significance (P < 0.05) are shown in the graphs.
Figure 6Histopathological findings of fibrosis in right ventricular EMB. (A). Inflammation-negative EMB. (B). Inflammation-positive EMB. (C). Quantitative expression of fibrosis. Micrographs show one representative picture from one patient of each group. Fibrosis is colored blue. Magnification × 10.