Literature DB >> 25888080

Cytotoxicity and sub-acute toxicity in Crl:CD (SD) rats of traditional herbal formula Ojeok-san.

Soo-Jin Jeong1, Jung-Im Huh2, Hyeun-Kyoo Shin3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although Ojeok-san (OJS), an oriental herbal formula, has been used in Asian countries including Korea, China and Japan to treat the common cold and illnesses including fatigue and gastrointestinal disorders, there is little information of its safety and toxicity in vivo and in vitro.
METHODS: In the present study, we investigated oral toxicity of OJS over 4 weeks through repeated administration to Crl:CD (SD) rats and its cytotoxicity against various cells as a part of safety evaluation. Animals were given a daily gavage treatment of OJS in daily dosages of 0, 500, 1000 or 2000 mg/kg for 4 weeks. Cytotoxicity assay was conducted at various concentrations in 23 different cell lines including neuroblastoma, glioblastoma, hepatocarcinoma, melanoma, leukemia, colon cancer, breast cancer, keratinocytes, phechromocytoma, prostate cancer, bronchial epithelial cells, and gastric adenocarcinoma.
RESULTS: OJS did not induce significant changes in mortality, food consumption, organ weights, hematology, serum biochemistry, and urinalysis, except for decrease in number of white blood cells over 1000 mg/kg/day female group. Thus, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) is more than 2000 mg/kg/day for male and 500 mg/kg/day for female rats. In addition, OJS had no cytotoxicity against all tested cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our data indicate that OJS may be a safe drug although additional studies in the near future will be required before clinical trials can be taken.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25888080      PMCID: PMC4354991          DOI: 10.1186/s12906-015-0582-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med        ISSN: 1472-6882            Impact factor:   3.659


Backgrounds

Drug safety is one of major issue in new drug development. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in most countries provides guidance on drug safety information for developing and disseminating new drugs with no or less toxicity as well as side effect. With the development of traditional medicine, concerns on the safety and potential toxicity of herbal medicines are increasing. However, there is little information of herbal medicine on the safety compared with synthetic drugs. Ojeok-san (OJS; wuji-san in China and goshaku-san in Japan) consisting of 17 medicinal herbs has long been used for treating common cold and illnesses including fatigue and gastrointestinal disorders in Asian countries including Korea, China and Japan. According to statistical data of the Korea National Health Insurance Corporation in 2011, OJS is the most frequently used herbal formulas of Oriental health treatments by 56 prescriptions. OJS is occupied 23% of the days of medication and 30% of medical expenses in Korea [1]. In experimental studies, OJS has been reported to have several biochemical activities such as anti-cancer [2], anti-inflammation [3,4], anti-hyperglycemia [5], anti-clastogenic effect [6] and immune regulation [7]. In addition, Kim et al. recently established OJS administration criteria and a questionnaire to evaluate its holistic effects on patients with low back pain (LBP) [8]. Our group reported toxicological data on acute and sub-chronic toxicity [9] as well as genotoxicity [10] of OJS in Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats. However, sub-acute toxicity information is also required to establish the safety and efficacy of OJS. Therefore, we here assessed the toxicity of a 4-week repeated oral doses of OJS in Crl:CD (SD) rat model according to guidelines established by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) for the testing of chemicals in accordance with the current regulations for Good Laboratory Practice Regulations [11]. Our data demonstrate that OJS orally administered to rats is safe without drug-related toxicity in 4-week repeated administration study. Furthermore, the cytotoxicity of OJS was evaluated against various cell lines from different origins.

Methods

Preparation of Ojeok-san (OJS)

The OJS consisting of seventeen herbal medicines (Table 1) and each crude drug was purchased from Kwangmyoungdang (Ulsan, Korea). The origin of materials was confirmed taxonomically by Profs. Je-Hyun Lee (Dongguk University, Gyeongju, Korea) and Young-Bae Seo (Daejeon University, Daejeon, Korea). A decoction of OJS was prepared as previously described [9]. In brief, a mixture of chopped crude herbs was extracted in 10 volume of distilled water at 100°C for 2 h in an herb extractor (COSMOS-660, Kyungseo Machine Co., Incheon, Korea). The solution was filtered and lyophilized with a freeze drier (PVTFD100R, Ilshin Lab. Ltd., Korea) (The yield = 11.3%). The HPLC pattern of OJS extract was identified for quality control [9].
Table 1

The composition of OJS

Latin name Amount (g) Company of purchase Source
Atractylodis Rhizoma7.50KwangmyoungdangChina
Ephedrae Herba3.75KwangmyoungdangChina
Citri Unshius Pericarpium3.75KwangmyoungdangJeju, Korea
Magnoliae Cortex3.00KwangmyoungdangChina
Platycodonis Radix3.00KwangmyoungdangMuju, Korea
Aurantii Fructus Immaturus3.00KwangmyoungdangChina
Angelicae Gigantis Radix3.00KwangmyoungdangBonghwa, Korea
Zingiberis Rhizoma3.00KwangmyoungdangTaean, Korea
Paeoniae Radix3.00KwangmyoungdangEuiseong, Korea
Poria Sclerotium3.00KwangmyoungdangPyeongchang, Korea
Angelicae Dahuricad Radix2.63KwangmyoungdangUljin, Korea
Cnidii Rhizoma2.63KwangmyoungdangYeongyang, Korea
Pinelliae Tuber2.63KwangmyoungdangChina
Cinnamomi Cortex2.63KwangmyoungdangVietnam
Glycyrrhizae Radix et Rhizoma2.25KwangmyoungdangChina
Zingiberis Rhizoma Crudus3.75KwangmyoungdangYeongcheon, Korea
Allii Fistulosi Bulbus3.75KwangmyoungdangHanam, Korea
Total amount56.25
The composition of OJS

Animals

The animal studies were conducted according to the guidance of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in Korea Institute of Toxicology (KRICT) (accredited by AAALAC International, 1998) under the Good Laboratory Practice Regulations for Non-clinical Laboratory Studies and approved by Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Daejeon, Korea). Specific pathogen-free Crl:CD (SD) rats (n = 20/gender) were obtained from the Orient Bio Co. (Seoul, Korea) and used after 2 weeks of quarantine and acclimatization. The animals were housed in a room maintained at 22 ± 3°C under a relative humidity of 50 ± 20% with artificial lighting from 08:00 to 20:00 and 12–15 air changes per hour. The animals were kept in stainless-steel wire-mesh cages and allowed sterilized tap water and commercial rodent chow (PMI Nutrition International, Richmond, VA, USA) ad libitum.

Group assignment and treatment

Healthy male and female rats were assigned to four groups (5 male and 5 female/group) using Path/Tox System 4.2.2 (Xybion Medical Systems Corporation, Cedar Knolls, NJ, USA). OJS extract was dissolved in distilled water for injection (Choong-wae Pharmaceutical, Ltd., Seoul, Korea) and administered by oral gavage at doses of 0, 500, 1000 or 2000 mg/kg once a day for 4 weeks. Distilled water was given to the animals as the vehicle control. The daily dose (10 ml/kg body weight) of OJS was calculated based on the most recently recorded body weights of individual animals.

General observations

Clinical signs and mortality were recorded twice a day (before and after treatment) throughout the study period. All clinical signs were recorded individually for type, observation day/time and duration using Path/Tox System 4.2.2 (Xybion Medical Systems Corporation). The body weight of each rat was measured at the initiation of treatment and once a week during the study period. Food consumption was measured at the start of treatment and weekly throughout. Daily food consumption was determined by measuring the weight of chow supplied and remaining in metabolic cages each day. External eye examination was carried out during the last week of treatment with an indirect binocular ophthalmoscope (IO-H, Neitz Instrument Co., Tokyo, Japan), and the appearance of the conjunctiva, sclera, cornea, lens, and iris of each eye was recorded.

Urinalysis, hematology and serum biochemistry

During the last week of treatment, urinalysis was conducted on samples collected overnight in metabolic cages using a Multistix 10 SG (Bayer, Whippany, NJ, USA) and urine chemical analyzer (Clinitek-500, Ramsey, MN, USA). Analysis included urine volume, glucose, bilirubin, ketone body, specific gravity, occult blood, pH, urobilinogen, and color. Animals were fasted overnight prior to blood collection or necropsy. Blood was drawn from the posterior vena cava under isoflurane anesthesia. Samples were collected in CBC bottles containing EDTA-2 K (Sewon Medical Co., Cheonan, Korea), and were analyzed to determine red blood cell count (RBC), white blood cell count (WBC), differential WBC count, hemoglobin concentration (HGC), hematocrit (HCT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), platelet (PLT) and reticulocyte (RET) using an ADVIA120 Hematology System (Bayer). Prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) were determined in blood samples treated with 3.2% sodium citrate using a coagulometer (ACL 300 plus, Instrumentation Laboratory, Milan, Italy). For serum biochemistry, blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min and analyzed with an autoanalyzer (Toshiba 200FR NEO, Toshiba Co., Tokyo, Japan). The analysis included alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (CREA), creatine kinase (CK), glucose (GLU), total cholesterol (TCHO), albumin (ALB), albumin/globulin ratio (A/G), total protein (TP), triglyceride (TG), total bilirubin (TBIL), phospholipids (PL), sodium (Na), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), chloride (Cl), and inorganic phosphorus (IP).

Necropsy

All surviving animals were anesthetized with isofluorane and sacrificed by aortic exsanguination prior to necropsy. Complete gross postmortem examinations were performed on all animals. Absolute organ weights were measured and relative organ weights (organ-to-body weight ratios) were calculated for the following organs: brain, pituitary gland, adrenal gland, liver, spleen, kidneys, heart, thymus, lung, salivary gland, thyroids, testes, ovaries, epididymides, seminal vesicle, prostate, and uterus.

Cytotoxicity assay

Twenty-three of various cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA) or Korean Cell Line Bank (Seoul, Korea). Cytotoxic effects of OJS against the cell lines were measured by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay as previously described [12]. Cell viability was calculated as a percentage of viable cells in drug-treated group versus untreated control by following equation.

Statistical analysis

Data collected during the study were examined for the variance homogeneity using Bartlett’s test. When Bartlett’s test indicated no significant deviation from the variance homogeneity, a one-way ANOVA was performed at α = 0.05. When significance was noted, a multiple comparison test (Dunnett’s test) was conducted to determine which pairs of groups were significantly different. Where significant deviations from variance homogeneity were observed, a nonparametric comparison test (Kruskal–Wallis test) was conducted. When a significant difference was observed in the Kruskal–Wallis test, the Dunn’s Rank Sum test was conducted to determine the specific pairs. Statistical analyses were performed using the Path/Tox System (ver. 4.2.2). The level of significance was taken as p < 0.05 or 0.01.

Results and discussion

Recently, the use of herbal medicines is increased and thus the safety information is considered an important issue for herbal prescription. U.S. FDA has restricted the use of products containing aristolochic acid including botanical products marketed as traditional medicine since they can increase to occur in renal failure and renal cancer. It is of note that 11 kinds of herbal formulas are included in the restricted product list. Thus, safety report of medicinal herb or herbal formula is crucial step for their drug development and medication counseling. We previously reported that no mortality and no abnormality in clinical signs, body weight, and necropsy findings for any of the animals in the acute and sub-chronic toxicity study following oral administration of OJS, a Korean traditional herbal formula [9]. In the present study, we evaluated safety of OJS by in vivo sub-acute toxicological analysis and in vitro cytotoxicity test.

Body weight, organ weight and food intake changes in SD rats treated with OJS extract for 4 weeks

Sub-acute toxicity of OJS extract was assessed in male or female Crl:CD (SD) rats (n = 24/gender) in accordance with OECD guideline. OJS extract was orally administered for 4 weeks at 500, 1000 or 2000 mg/kg/day. Body weight of male or female rats was increased in a time-dependent manner (Figure 1). However, no effect of OJS extract was observed on body weight change in both genders of rats compared with vehicle control.
Figure 1

Mean body weight changes of male (left panel) and female (right panel) rats treated with OJS at doses of 0 (○), 500 (■), 1,000 (▲), and 2,000 (●) mg/kg/day for 4 weeks. Values are presented as mean ± SD.

Mean body weight changes of male (left panel) and female (right panel) rats treated with OJS at doses of 0 (○), 500 (■), 1,000 (▲), and 2,000 (●) mg/kg/day for 4 weeks. Values are presented as mean ± SD. Loss of food intake in OJS extract-treated rats was found in male group compared with vehicle control. Significant differences were observed following treatment with 1000 mg/kg at day 16. At day 23, results revealed that administration of OJS with 500, 1000 or 2000 mg/kg reduced food intake compared with vehicle control without statistical significance (Figure 2, left panel). However, we could not observe change of body weight in these groups, indicating that any alterations in food intake in male rats are regarded as incidental due to variations in measured values. In contrast, no food consumption changes were observed in female group (Figure 2, right panel).
Figure 2

Food intake in male (left panel) and female (right panel) rats treated with OJS at doses of 0 (○), 500 (■), 1,000 (▲), and 2,000 (●) mg/kg/day for 4 weeks. Values are presented as mean ± SD. Significant difference, * p < 0.05 from V.CONTROL group.

Food intake in male (left panel) and female (right panel) rats treated with OJS at doses of 0 (○), 500 (■), 1,000 (▲), and 2,000 (●) mg/kg/day for 4 weeks. Values are presented as mean ± SD. Significant difference, * p < 0.05 from V.CONTROL group. In addition, changes in relative organ weights were also evaluated as shown in Table 2. No significant difference between control and OJS extract-treated groups was detected in terms of the relative weights of 15 different organs in both male and female animals. Furthermore, major clinical signs such as salivation and loss of fur were not observed in both male and female rats treated with OJS extract (data not shown).
Table 2

Relative organ weights rats treated with OJS for 4 weeks

Dose (mg/kg/day) 0 500 1000 2000
Male
Brain1.966 ± 0.06892.036 ± 0.05121.922 ± 0.04541.975 ± 0.0695
Pituitary gland0.010 ± 0.00170.010 ± 0.00200.011 ± 0.00320.011 ± 0.0012
Liver11.204 ± 0.730212.838 ± 0.753910.520 ± 0.971010.789 ± 0.6777
Spleen0.720 ± 0.08920.716 ± 0.04000.638 ± 0.07860.711 ± 0.1093
Heart1.225 ± 0.08351.138 ± 0.05911.096 ± 0.10131.194 ± 0.0311
Thymus0.570 ± 0.09160.553 ± 0.13950.544 ± 0.07610.549 ± 0.1076
Salivary glands0.604 ± 0.04150.572 ± 0.03180.548 ± 0.04150.605 ± 0.0289
Seminal vesicle1.124 ± 0.12040.956 ± 0.30660.890 ± 0.25330.986 ± 0.1801
Prostate0.432 ± 0.08210.371 ± 0.05990.445 ± 0.05680.464 ± 0.0810
Kidneys2.934 ± 0.23723.117 ± 0.16762.803 ± 0.28662.947 ± 0.2479
Adrenal glands0.054 ± 0.00690.062 ± 0.00980.055 ± 0.00220.055 ± 0.0079
Testes3.079 ± 0.14993.043 ± 0.17762.952 ± 0.13682.845 ± 0.5047
Epididymides0.896 ± 0.04750.880 ± 0.04450.840 ± 0.04450.862 ± 0.1289
Lung1.357 ± 0.15201.473 ± 0.12361.322 ± 0.07341.377 ± 0.1054
Thyroid/Parathyroid0.019 ± 0.00380.020 ± 0.00340.017 ± 0.00280.018 ± 0.0023
Female
Brain1.851 ± 0.07761.840 ± 0.08891.815 ± 0.06681.833 ± 0.0563
Pituitary gland0.012 ± 0.00250.014 ± 0.00150.014 ± 0.00280.010 ± 0.0023
Liver7.367 ± 0.45267.096 ± 0.67507.435 ± 0.81098.006 ± 0.2126
Spleen0.540 ± 0.08790.499 ± 0.05120.483 ± 0.05370.474 ± 0.0788
Heart0.807 ± 0.02780.762 ± 0.06470.820 ± 0.08310.833 ± 0.0316
Thymus0.545 ± 0.14800.491 ± 0.07150.426 ± 0.04830.467 ± 0.0627
Salivary glands0.412 ± 0.02210.387 ± 0.02800.403 ± 0.02930.410 ± 0.0266
Kidneys1.807 ± 0.12721.877 ± 0.11721.930 ± 0.21211.885 ± 0.0786
Adrenal glands0.074 ± 0.00870.070 ± 0.01180.077 ± 0.01270.070 ± 0.0122
Ovaries0.084 ± 0.01040.076 ± 0.00700.093 ± 0.1490.094 ± 0.0171
Lung1.102 ± 0.03691.039 ± 0.09941.069 ± 0.13361.098 ± 0.0551
Thyroid/parathyroid0.014 ± 0.00210.016 ± 0.00480.016 ± 0.00360.017 ± 0.0021
Uterus/cervix0.451 ± 0.14350.409 ± 0.11210.576 ± 0.15980.458 ± 0.0742

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

Relative organ weights rats treated with OJS for 4 weeks Values are presented as mean ± SD.

Hematology, serum biochemistry and urinalysis in SD rats treated with OJS extract for 4 weeks

In male group, there was no significant hematological change in OJS extract-treated group compared with vehicle control. In contrast, WBC number was decreased in a dosage-dependent manner and PT was slightly increased in female rats treated with OJS extract compared with control (Table 3), suggesting that decrease in WBC number is specific for female group. The change is possibly correlated with a weak reduction of absolute and relative spleen weight in female rats although there was no statistical significance from vehicle control (Table 2).
Table 3

Hematological values of animals treated with OJS for 4 weeks

Dose (mg/kg/day) 0 500 1000 2000
Male
WBC (103/μL)10.1 ± 3.3210.2 ± 4.0010.3 ± 1.059.8 ± 1.09
Reticulocyte (%)2.6 ± 0.572.5 ± 0.302.5 ± 0.302.3 ± 0.34
Neutrophils (%)16.0 ± 5.1612.1 ± 4.4211.2 ± 1.9211.0 ± 3.17
Lymphocytes (%)77.3 ± 5.7682.4 ± 5.6583.1 ± 2.0382.0 ± 3.57
Eosinophils (%)0.9 ± 0.230.7 ± 0.360.6 ± 0.130.9 ± 0.26
Monocytes (%)3.5 ± 1.112.6 ± 1.073.0 ± 0.593.8 ± 0.77
Basophils (%)1.0 ± 0.380.9 ± 0.401.0 ± 0.450.8 ± 0.23
Large unstained cells (%)1.3 ± 0.401.2 ± 0.261.1 ± 0.111.5 ± 0.27
RBC (106/μL)7.9 ± 0.278.0 ± 0.128.2 ± 0.408.0 ± 0.38
Hemoglobin (g/dl)15.7 ± 0.4616.0 ± 0.3516.3 ± 0.7115.6 ± 0.64
Hematocrit (%)46.2 ± 1.0746.4 ± 1.1047.7 ± 1.9046.0 ± 1.93
MCV (fL)58.7 ± 1.8858.0 ± 0.5658.3 ± 1.5957.5 ± 1.37
MCH (pg)19.9 ± 0.4119.9 ± 0.2719.9 ± 0.7419.5 ± 0.45
MCHC (g/dl)34.0 ± 0.6334.4 ± 0.3934.1 ± 0.6533.9 ± 0.13
Platelet (103/μL)1113.0 ± 124.701195.0 ± 197.001074.0 ± 129.801155.0 ± 65.60
Female
WBC (103/μL)11.5 ± 1.369.4 ± 2.398.0 ± 1.60* 6.4 ± 0.93**
Reticulocyte (%)2.1 ± 0.162.1 ± 0.162.0 ± 0.532.2 ± 0.28
Neutrophils (%)12.3 ± 4.3212.3 ± 4.329.6 ± 2.5411.1 ± 4.56
Lymphocytes (%)81.8 ± 4.3784.3 ± 4.5884.4 ± 2.2282.8 ± 4.28
Eosinophils (%)0.3 ± 0.240.7 ± 0.150.7 ± 0.260.8 ± 0.20
Monocytes (%)2.9 ± 0.703.3 ± 0.693.0 ± 1.123.0 ± 1.48
Basophils (%)1.1 ± 0.541.2 ± 0.311.1 ± 0.391.2 ± 0.39
Large unstained cells (%)1.0 ± 0.221.2 ± 0.341.2 ± 0.361.1 ± 0.26
RBC (106/μL)8.1 ± 0.368.3 ± 0.268.0 ± 0.228.1 ± 0.44
Hemoglobin (g/dl)16.2 ± 0.5116.5 ± 0.2915.8 ± 0.4316.4 ± 0.42
Hematocrit (%)46.4 ± 1.7647.3 ± 1.0945.9 ± 0.8647.2 ± 2.15
MCV (fL)57.6 ± 0.6456.8 ± 0.7957.7 ± 1.9258.2 ± 1.68
MCH (pg)20.1 ± 0.3519.8 ± 0.3719.8 ± 0.7620.4 ± 0.64
MCHC (g/dl)34.9 ± 0.6134.9 ± 0.3034.4 ± 0.3834.9 ± 0.85
Platelet (103/μL)1169.0 ± 86.401168.0 ± 91.101297.0 ± 85.101199.0 ± 184.20

MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; PT, prothrombin time.

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

* and ** indicates a significant difference at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 level, respectively, when compared with the vehicle control group.

Hematological values of animals treated with OJS for 4 weeks MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; PT, prothrombin time. Values are presented as mean ± SD. * and ** indicates a significant difference at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 level, respectively, when compared with the vehicle control group. In serum analysis, we observed OJS administration altered levels of several biochemical factors such as creatinine, total protein, total cholesterol, phospholipid and chloride in male, (Table 4). OJS also decreased triglyceride level in female rats, suggesting the possible potential drug candidate for the metabolic diseases such as obesity, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and cardiovascular diseases. However, these changes did not have dosage-dependent correlation and may result from the individual difference within normal range [13,14]. Thus, they were not considered to be OJS-mediated abnormalities. In urinalysis values, there were no significant changes found in rats of either sex among any of the OJS-treated groups for urine volume, glucose, bilirubin, ketone body, specific gravity, occult blood, pH, urobilinogen, and color when compared with the vehicle-only control in this study (Table 5).
Table 4

Serum biochemical values of animals treated with OJS for 4 weeks

Dose (mg/kg/day) 0 500 1000 2000
Male
Glucose (mg/dL)96.2 ± 28.22100.1 ± 12.23114.6 ± 15.0493.7 ± 10.74
BUN (mg/dL)13.1 ± 1.7311.2 ± 2.1012.6 ± 0.8713.1 ± 0.61
Creatinine (mg/dL)0.5 ± 0.030.5 ± 0.02* 0.6 ± 0.020.5 ± 0.03
Total protein (g/dL)6.5 ± 0.196.6 ± 0.116.5 ± 0.096.2 ± 0.15*
Albumin (g/dL)4.3 ± 0.114.3 ± 0.064.2 ± 0.054.1 ± 0.04
Albumin/globulin ratio1.9 ± 0.141.8 ± 0.081.9 ± 0.052.0 ± 0.09
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)54.0 ± 5.9268.2 ± 7.66* 72.2 ± 12.56** 60.4 ± 4.22
Triglycerides (mg/dL)38.6 ± 15.8858.0 ± 19.5247.9 ± 10.7846.8 ± 14.78
Phospholipid (mg/dL)88 ± 7.90105.0 ± 5.00* 108.0 ± 13.70** 93.0 ± 5.00
AST (IU/L)130.3 ± 21.37111.7 ± 17.16114.0 ± 9.78118.7 ± 26.26
ALT (IU/L)32.6 ± 4.5933.3 ± 4.1834.3 ± 4.7838.8 ± 2.35
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)0.2 ± 0.020.1 ± 0.010.1 ± 0.010.1 ± 0.00
ALP (IU/L)452.1 ± 54.40472.9 ± 97.97450.7 ± 50.77422.1 ± 31.08
Creatine kinase (IU/L)736.0 ± 249.90551.0 ± 204.30587.0 ± 113.40665.0 ± 363.60
Ca (mg/dL)10.9 ± 0.4411.2 ± 0.2211.5 ± 0.1811.2 ± 0.53
IP (mg/dL)10.8 ± 0.9610.9 ± 0.4210.7 ± 0.4911.1 ± 0.73
Na (mmol/L)146.0 ± 1.60146.0 ± 0.90146.0 ± 0.80147.0 ± 1.50
K (mmol/L)7.47 ± 1.578.7 ± 0.618.6 ± 0.527.6 ± 0.84
Cl (mmol/L)103.0 ± 1.30100.0 ± 0.90* 102.0 ± 1.60102.0 ± 0.50
GGT (IU/L)0.8 ± 0.331.2 ± 0.620.7 ± 0.380.5 ± 0.44
Female
Glucose (mg/dL)94.2 ± 16.5790.7 ± 22.27112.5 ± 47.4586.8 ± 27.31
BUN (mg/dL)17.4 ± 2.4617.7 ± 2.9016.7 ± 2.4218.9 ± 3.47
Creatinine (mg/dL)0.6 ± 0.050.6 ± 0.030.6 ± 0.070.6 ± 0.05
Total protein (g/dL)6.9 ± 0.436.9 ± 0.287.0 ± 0.257.0 ± 0.18
Albumin (g/dL)4.5 ± 0.304.6 ± 0.154.6 ± 0.204.6 ± 0.11
Albumin/globulin ratio1.9 ± 0.082.0 ± 0.081.91 ± 0.12.0 ± 0.11
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)80.6 ± 13.9472.2 ± 12.6062.6 ± 17.7376.0 ± 12.90
Triglycerides (mg/dL)41.6 ± 14.1029.4 ± 3.3925.0 ± 1.88* 26.4 ± 4.80
Phospholipid (mg/dL)141.0 ± 22.70126.0 ± 18.50112.0 ± 20.40128.0 ± 17.00
AST (IU/L)110.2 ± 12.78112.2 ± 20.95110.6 ± 18.88119.6 ± 21.56
ALT (IU/L)26.7 ± 4.1228.3 ± 4.4628.9 ± 4.9029.4 ± 4.51
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)0.1 ± 0.010.1 ± 0.010.1 ± 0.030.1 ± 0.02
ALP (IU/L)238.6 ± 37.60266.7 ± 59.82270.0 ± 67.43254.9 ± 38.56
Creatine kinase (IU/L)580.0 ± 140.90547.0 ± 169.30408.0 ± 76.30656.0 ± 204.00
Ca (mg/dL)11.9 ± 0.1211.6 ± 0.5511.5 ± 0.3911.2 ± 0.22
IP (mg/dL)10.7 ± 0.6510.2 ± 0.5610.0 ± 0.9010.1 ± 0.41
Na (mmol/L)145.0 ± 0.80145.0 ± 1.80145.0 ± 0.50144.0 ± 1.10
K (mmol/L)7.9 ± 0.767.7 ± 0.547.5 ± 0.467.9 ± 0.79
Cl (mmol/L)102.0 ± 1.20103.0 ± 1.50103.0 ± 1.10102.0 ± 0.80
GGT (IU/L)1.5 ± 0.701.2 ± 0.661.7 ± 0.531.3 ± 0.57

ALP, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alkaline phosphatase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen.

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

* and ** indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 levels, respectively, when compared with the vehicle control group.

Table 5

Urinalyses of animals treated with OJS for 4 weeks

Group Volume (mL) Glucose a Bilirubin a Ketone body a Specific gravity Occult blood a pH Urobilinogen (E.U./dL) Color b
Male
V. CONTROL22 ± 4.50/50/50/5≤1.005 ~ 1.0200/57.00.2S(5)
500 mg/kg26 ± 12.40/50/50/5≤1.005 ~ 1.0200/57.00.2S(5)
1000 mg/kg13 ± 2.90/50/50/51.015 ~ 1.0250/56.90.2S(5)
2000 mg/kg22 ± 11.60/50/51/51.010 ~ 1.0250/56.80.2S(5)
Female
V. CONTROL9 ± 2.00/50/50/51.015 ~ 1.0250/56.50.2S(5)
500 mg/kg9 ± 3.80/50/50/51.010 ~ 1.0250/56.80.2S(5)
1000 mg/kg9 ± 4.50/51/50/51.015 ~ 1.0250/56.60.2S(5)
2000 mg/kg10 ± 4.80/51/50/51.010 ~ ≥1.0300/56.50.2S(4), Y(1)

aNumber of animals with sign/Total number of animals observed.

bS, strawberry and Y, yellow.

Serum biochemical values of animals treated with OJS for 4 weeks ALP, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alkaline phosphatase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen. Values are presented as mean ± SD. * and ** indicate significant difference at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 levels, respectively, when compared with the vehicle control group. Urinalyses of animals treated with OJS for 4 weeks aNumber of animals with sign/Total number of animals observed. bS, strawberry and Y, yellow.

Cytotoxicity of OJS extract

We further tested the cytotoxicity of OJS against 23 different cell lines. Viability of the cells was evaluated by MTT assay. Cells were treated with various concentrations (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, or 200 μg/ml) of OJS extract for 24 h. As shown in Table 5, OJS had no significant effect on the viability of cells including SH-SY5Y, SK-N-SH (neuroblastoma), U-373 MG, U-87 MG (glioblastoma), HepG2, Hep3B (hepatocarcinoma), Clone M-3, B16F10 (melanoma), HEK-293, NRK52 (kidney cells), 3T3-L1, NIH-3T3 (fibroblast), HIT-T15 (pancreatic cells), HL-60, RBL-1 (leukemia), HT-29 (colon cancer), MCF-7 (breast cancer), HaCaT (keratinocytes), PC12 (phechromocytoma), LNCaP (prostate cancer), BEAS-2B (bronchial epithelial cells), and AGS (gastric adenocarcinoma) up to 200 μg/ml in all tested cell lines (Table 6). Data are consistent with the results of 4 week-repeated toxicity test in animal model.
Table 6

Cytotoxicity of OJS in various cell lines

Cell line Origin Concentration (μg/ml)
0 10 20 50 100 200
SH-SY5YHuman, Neuroblastoma100 ± 1.97100 ± 3.4899 ± 1.7499 ± 3.3498 ± 2.6596 ± 1.55
Clone M-3Mouse, Melanoma100 ± 4.22101 ± 5.5998 ± 3.67100 ± 8.2699 ± 6.1799 ± 10.22
SK-N-SHHuman, Neuroblastoma (brain)100 ± 2.20105 ± 2.71104 ± 1.66107 ± 3.00105 ± 1.38108 ± 3.09
U-373 MGHuman, Glioblastoma (brain)100 ± 2.63100 ± 4.2897 ± 1.8395 ± 1.4496 ± 1.6796 ± 4.22
U-87 MGHuman, Glioblastoma (brain)100 ± 7.07100 ± 2.5696 ± 1.2299 ± 4.13100 ± 3.38100 ± 4.74
HEK-293Human, Kidney100 ± 9.45101 ± 3.50109 ± 4.62106 ± 3.6096 ± 2.8697 ± 3.14
HepG2Human, Hepatoblastoma100 ± 2.6792 ± 3.4993 ± 3.0592 ± 4.9299 ± 2.0687 ± 4.32
Hep3BHuman, Hepatocarcinoma100 ± 1.95100 ± 2.56101 ± 2.15104 ± 0.5196 ± 3.4793 ± 0.85
RAW 264.7Mouse, Macrophage100 ± 5.72112 ± 9.54121 ± 3.42117 ± 3.59115 ± 1.71113 ± 1.56
3T3-L1Mouse, Fibroblast (pre-adipocyte)100 ± 2.60105 ± 3.71105 ± 2.67110 ± 1.95109 ± 3.04113 ± 4.31
HIT-T15Hamster, Pancreas100 ± 2.8395 ± 15.6297 ± 13.8597 ± 16.7896 ± 8.3595 ± 7.53
HL-60Human, Leukemia, lymphoblast100 ± 1.13100 ± 1.25100 ± 1.5099 ± 1.43100 ± 1.9798 ± 1.99
HT-29Human, Colon cancer cell100 ± 2.78102 ± 1.36121 ± 2.5599 ± 1.79102 ± 3.45104 ± 4.85
NIH-3T3Mouse, Fibroblast100 ± 6.28102 ± 5.43103 ± 5.32102 ± 6.82105 ± 9.97104 ± 5.99
B16F10Mouse, Melanoma100 ± 8.8791 ± 2.4391 ± 5.5094 ± 3.1798 ± 6.68111 ± 3.72
MCF-7Human, Breast cancer100 ± 4.84114 ± 11.1114 ± 0.44114 ± 4.23110 ± 8.76110 ± 4.33
HaCaTHuman, Keratinocyte100 ± 1.5598 ± 1.6798 ± 1.0099 ± 3.2197 ± 3.81102 ± 2.99
PC12Rat, Adrenal medulla, pheochromocytoma100 ± 1.28102 ± 1.7196 ± 1.5498 ± 2.9498 ± 2.1293 ± 3.20
AGSHuman, Gastric adenocarcinoma100 ± 1.3199 ± 1.94100 ± 3.894 ± 10.3696 ± 1.83100 ± 1.80
BEAS-2BHuman, Bronchial epithelial, normal cell100 ± 2.00102 ± 0.86101 ± 1.24101 ± 0.65104 ± 3.42105 ± 2.68
LNCaPHuman, Prostate cancer100 ± 9.14101 ± 5.75102 ± 8.88101 ± 7.03102 ± 12.5198 ± 6.86
RBL-1Rat, Basophilic leukemia100 ± 5.97102 ± 9.42102 ± 6.60102 ± 1.80103 ± 2.12102 ± 0.58
NRK52Rat, Kidney100 ± 1.19100 ± 1.1999 ± 2.18102 ± 1.01102 ± 3.99106 ± 2.65
Cytotoxicity of OJS in various cell lines

Conclusions

We previously reported the safety of OJS in acute and sub-chronic toxicity as well as genotoxicity studies in rats. In addition, adverse effect of OJS has not been reported in clinical studies. Our current present study demonstrate that oral administration of Oriental herbal formula OJS causes leukopenia in female SD rats treated for 4 weeks. Thus, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) values of OJS administration are determined to 2000 mg/kg/day in male and 500 mg/kg/day in female rats. Furthermore, no cytotoxic effect of OJS was found up to 200 μg/ml in 23 different cell lines. The cytotoxicity information of OJS can be used for in vitro biological studies. Further pharmacological studies will be required to find out the cause of WBC decrease by OJS in female rats before applying clinical studies in humans.
  6 in total

1.  Genotoxicity assessment of a herbal formula, Ojeok-san.

Authors:  Hyekyung Ha; Jun Kyoung Lee; Ho Young Lee; Chang-Seob Seo; Mee-young Lee; Jung-Im Huh; Hyeun Kyoo Shin
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 4.360

2.  Study to establish Ojeok-San (Five Accumulation Powder: wu ji san) administration criteria and a questionnaire to evaluate the holistic effects of Ojeok-San on patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Kim; Dongwoo Nam; Byung-Jin Ahn; Seung-Deok Lee; Jae-Dong Lee; Kap-Sung Kim
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.579

3.  Evaluation of safety of the herbal formula Ojeok-san: acute and sub-chronic toxicity studies in rats.

Authors:  Hyekyung Ha; Jun Kyoung Lee; Ho Young Lee; Chang-seob Seo; Jung-Hoon Kim; Mee-young Lee; Woo Suk Koh; Hyeun Kyoo Shin
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.360

4.  Anti-clastogenic effect of magnolol-containing Hange-koboku-to, Dai-joki-to, Goshaku-san, and Magnoliae Cortex on benzo(a)pyrene-induced clastogenicity in mice.

Authors:  Junichiro Saito; Hiroko Fukushima; Hisamitsu Nagase
Journal:  Biol Pharm Bull       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.233

5.  Ojeok-san, a traditional Korean herbal medicine attenuates airway inflammation and pulmonary fibrosis induced by repeated ovalbumin challenge.

Authors:  In Sik Shin; Mee Young Lee; Woo Young Jeon; Jong Choon Kim; Hyeun Kyoo Shin
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.360

6.  A 4-week Repeated Dose Oral Toxicity and Cytotoxicity Study of Gumiganghwaltang in Crl:CD (SD) Rats.

Authors:  Mee-Young Lee; In-Sik Shin; Chang-Seob Seo; Jung-Hoon Kim; Heykyung Ha; Jung-Im Huh; Hyeun-Kyoo Shin
Journal:  Toxicol Int       Date:  2011-07
  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Ojeok-san ameliorates visceral and somatic nociception in a mouse model of colitis induced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Patrice Cunningham; Aman Sumal; Emma Patton; Henry Helms; Matthew T Noneman; Gustavo Martinez-Muñiz; Jackie E Bader; Ioulia Chatzistamou; Ahmed Aladhami; Christian Unger; Reilly T Enos; Hyeun Kyoo Shin; Kandy T Velázquez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Safety Evaluation of a New Traditional Chinese Medical Formula, Ciji-Hua'ai-Baosheng II Formula, in Adult Rodent Models.

Authors:  Biqian Fu; Xiangyang Zhai; Shengyan Xi; Lifeng Yue; Yanan Wang; Yingkun Qiu; Yuewen Gong; Yangxinzi Xu; Linchao Qian; Jingru Huang; Dawei Lu; Shuqiong Huang; Jing Wang; Jing Zhou; Di Wu; Yanhui Wang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Acute and subacute toxicity of an ethanolic extract of Melandrii Herba in Crl:CD sprague dawley rats and cytotoxicity of the extract in vitro.

Authors:  Eunsook Park; Mee-Young Lee; Chang-Seob Seo; Sae-Rom Yoo; Woo-Young Jeon; Hyeun-Kyoo Shin
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.659

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.