Literature DB >> 25887785

Nutrition Label Viewing during a Food-Selection Task: Front-of-Package Labels vs Nutrition Facts Labels.

Dan J Graham, Charles Heidrick, Katie Hodgin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Earlier research has identified consumer characteristics associated with viewing Nutrition Facts labels; however, little is known about those who view front-of-package nutrition labels. Front-of-package nutrition labels might appeal to more consumers than do Nutrition Facts labels, but it might be necessary to provide consumers with information about how to locate and use these labels.
OBJECTIVE: This study quantifies Nutrition Facts and front-of-package nutrition label viewing among American adult consumers.
DESIGN: Attention to nutrition information was measured during a food-selection task. PARTICIPANTS/
SETTING: One hundred and twenty-three parents (mean age=38 years, mean body mass index [calculated as kg/m(2)]=28) and one of their children (aged 6 to 9 years) selected six foods from a university laboratory-turned-grocery aisle. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized to conditions in which front-of-package nutrition labels were present or absent, and signage explaining front-of-package nutrition labels was present or absent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adults' visual attention to Nutrition Facts labels and front-of-package nutrition labels was objectively measured via eye-tracking glasses. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: To examine whether there were significant differences in the percentages of participants who viewed Nutrition Facts labels vs front-of-package nutrition labels, McNemar's tests were conducted across all participants, as well as within various sociodemographic categories. To determine whether hypothesized factors, such as health literacy and education, had stronger relationships with front-of-package nutrition label vs Nutrition Facts label viewing, linear regression assessed the magnitude of relationships between theoretically and empirically derived factors and each type of label viewing.
RESULTS: Overall, front-of-package nutrition labels were more likely to be viewed than Nutrition Facts labels; however, for all subgroups, higher rates of front-of-package nutrition label viewership occurred only when signage was present drawing attention to the presence and meaning of front-of-package nutrition labels.
CONCLUSIONS: Consumers should receive education about the availability and use of new nutrition labels.
Copyright © 2015 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consumer education; Eye tracking; Front-of-package nutrition labeling; Multiple traffic light; Nutrition information

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25887785     DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet        ISSN: 2212-2672            Impact factor:   4.910


  12 in total

Review 1.  Innovative Techniques for Evaluating Behavioral Nutrition Interventions.

Authors:  Rachel E Scherr; Kevin D Laugero; Dan J Graham; Brian T Cunningham; Lisa Jahns; Karina R Lora; Marla Reicks; Amy R Mobley
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 2.  Food Labeling Use by Consumers in Arab countries: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Nada Benajiba; Lana Mahrous; Joshua Bernstein; Basil H Aboul-Enein
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2020-06

3.  Comparing five front-of-pack nutrition labels' influence on consumers' perceptions and purchase intentions.

Authors:  Mary T Gorski Findling; Paul M Werth; Aviva A Musicus; Marie A Bragg; Dan J Graham; Brian Elbel; Christina A Roberto
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-10-21       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Assessment of an e-training tool for college students to improve accuracy and reduce effort associated with reading nutrition labels.

Authors:  Lisa M Soederberg Miller; Carolyn Sutter; Machelle D Wilson; Jacqueline J Bergman; Laurel A Beckett; Tanja N Gibson
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2018-08-24

5.  Health Literacy, Numeracy, and Health Promotion: A Secondary Analysis of the Choosewell 365 Workplace Trial.

Authors:  Jenny Jia; Douglas E Levy; Jessica L McCurley; Emma Anderson; Emily D Gelsomin; Bianca Porneala; Anne N Thorndike
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 6.604

6.  Nutrition Facts Panels: Who Uses Them, What Do They Use, and How Does Use Relate to Dietary Intake?

Authors:  Mary J Christoph; Nicole Larson; Melissa N Laska; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.910

7.  Identifying over-the-counter information to prioritize for the purpose of reducing adverse drug reactions in older adults: A national survey of pharmacists.

Authors:  Beth A Martin; Robert M Breslow; Amanda Sims; Alyssa L Harben; Laura Bix; Mark W Becker
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2021-08-23

8.  The impact of interpretive and reductive front-of-pack labels on food choice and willingness to pay.

Authors:  Zenobia Talati; Richard Norman; Simone Pettigrew; Bruce Neal; Bridget Kelly; Helen Dixon; Kylie Ball; Caroline Miller; Trevor Shilton
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  The Color Nutrition Information Paradox: Effects of Suggested Sugar Content on Food Cue Reactivity in Healthy Young Women.

Authors:  Jonas Potthoff; Annalisa La Face; Anne Schienle
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Using change detection to objectively evaluate whether novel over-the-counter drug labels can increase attention to critical health information among older adults.

Authors:  Alyssa L Harben; Deborah A Kashy; Shiva Esfahanian; Lanqing Liu; Laura Bix; Mark W Becker
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.