BACKGROUND: In 2011, multiple gastroenterology societies published a position statement expressing concern over the American Board of Surgery guidelines regarding endoscopy education. Their position asserted that the American Board of Surgery's guidelines were inadequate to produce competency and the requirements should be similar to those adopted by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. This assertion failed to take into account the increasing use of simulation in surgical and endoscopic education. METHODS: Surgery residents were required to complete a self-paced endoscopy simulation curriculum. A retrospective review of all patients undergoing colonoscopy at a single institution over a 6-month period was then undertaken. Specifically, the quality measures associated with colonoscopy including the cecal intubation rate and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) were compared between those colonoscopies that were performed by faculty gastroenterologists and general surgery residents. RESULTS: In total, 818 colonoscopies were performed during the study period-598 were performed by the gastroenterology service (GI) and 220 were performed by general surgery residents on the surgery service (GS). Baseline characteristics of the groups were similar. Cecal intubation rates for GI and GS were 98.4% and 93.5% respectively. ADRs were similar between the groups (GI-29.8% in men and 15.3% in women; GS-26.8% in men and 18.7% in women). GI was found to perform biopsies at a higher rate than GS: 0.92 vs 0.62 (not significant, NS). GS had a higher rate of adenomas biopsied: 0.42 vs 0.32 (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Following endoscopy simulation training, general surgery residents, under the supervision of surgical staff, are capable of achieving quality measures equivalent to those of staff gastroenterologists at a single institution. The ADRs and cecal intubation rates seen in this study are consistent with those previously identified in the literature. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: In 2011, multiple gastroenterology societies published a position statement expressing concern over the American Board of Surgery guidelines regarding endoscopy education. Their position asserted that the American Board of Surgery's guidelines were inadequate to produce competency and the requirements should be similar to those adopted by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. This assertion failed to take into account the increasing use of simulation in surgical and endoscopic education. METHODS: Surgery residents were required to complete a self-paced endoscopy simulation curriculum. A retrospective review of all patients undergoing colonoscopy at a single institution over a 6-month period was then undertaken. Specifically, the quality measures associated with colonoscopy including the cecal intubation rate and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) were compared between those colonoscopies that were performed by faculty gastroenterologists and general surgery residents. RESULTS: In total, 818 colonoscopies were performed during the study period-598 were performed by the gastroenterology service (GI) and 220 were performed by general surgery residents on the surgery service (GS). Baseline characteristics of the groups were similar. Cecal intubation rates for GI and GS were 98.4% and 93.5% respectively. ADRs were similar between the groups (GI-29.8% in men and 15.3% in women; GS-26.8% in men and 18.7% in women). GI was found to perform biopsies at a higher rate than GS: 0.92 vs 0.62 (not significant, NS). GS had a higher rate of adenomas biopsied: 0.42 vs 0.32 (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Following endoscopy simulation training, general surgery residents, under the supervision of surgical staff, are capable of achieving quality measures equivalent to those of staff gastroenterologists at a single institution. The ADRs and cecal intubation rates seen in this study are consistent with those previously identified in the literature. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Jonathan Pearl; Erika Fellinger; Brian Dunkin; Eric Pauli; Thadeus Trus; Jeffrey Marks; Robert Fanelli; Michael Meara; Dimitrios Stefanidis; William Richardson Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Rishad Khan; Joanne Plahouras; Bradley C Johnston; Michael A Scaffidi; Samir C Grover; Catharine M Walsh Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-08-17