| Literature DB >> 25887415 |
Shan-Shan Li1,2, Liang-Sheng Wang3, Qing-Yan Shu4, Jie Wu5,6, Li-Guang Chen7, Shuai Shao8,9, Dan-Dan Yin10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tree peony (Paeonia section Moutan DC.) is known for its excellent ornamental and medicinal values. In 2011, seeds from P. ostii have been identified as novel resource of α-linolenic acid (ALA) for seed oil production and development in China. However, the molecular mechanism on biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids in tree peony seeds remains unknown. Therefore, transcriptome data is needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25887415 PMCID: PMC4404109 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1429-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Observation and measurement of lipids across the developmental period of tree peony seeds. (A) The developmental progress of P. ostii seeds (S1-S10). Pods were harvested at 10 days after pollination (DAP, immature stage), and then every 10 days until 100 DAP (pods containing mature seeds). (B) The five dominant fatty acids at ten time points during tree peony seed development (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Summary of tree peony seed transcriptome data sequenced by Illumina platform
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total reads | 24000000 | 24000000 | 24000000 | 24000000 | 24000000 | 24000000 |
| Clean reads | 23178989 | 23460290 | 23381675 | 23229451 | 23157379 | 23218522 |
| Clean data (Gb) | 4.64 | 4.70 | 4.68 | 4.65 | 4.63 | 4.64 |
| GC percentage (%) | 49.2% | 48.8% | 49.9% | 49.7% | 47.8% | 47.8% |
Figure 2Characteristics of Illumina reads and homology search of assembled contigs. (A) Size distribution of tree peony Illumina reads. (B) E-value distribution of best BLASTX hits for each unigenes. (C) Species distribution of top BLAST hits of tree peony sequences with other plant species. (D) Length of unigenes with hits or no hits.
Figure 3Functional classification of Gene Ontology annotation of tree peony unigenes. Unigenes were assigned to three categories: biological processes, cellular components, or molecular functions.
Figure 4Eukaryotic of orthologous groups (KOG) classification of assembled unigenes. A: RNA processing and modification. B: Chromatin structure and dynamics. C: Energy production and conversion. D: Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning. E: Amino acid transport and metabolism. F: Nucleotide transport and metabolism. G: Carbohydrate transport and metabolism. H: Coenzyme transport and metabolism. I: Lipid transport and metabolism. J: Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis. K: Transcription. L: Replication, recombination and repair. M: Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis. N: Cell motility. O: Posttranslational modification, protein turnover and chaperones. P: Inorganic ion transport and metabolism. Q: Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism. R: General function prediction only. S: Signal transduction mechanisms. T: Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport. U: Defense mechanisms. V: Extracellular structures. W: Nuclear structure. Y: Cytoskeleton.
Figure 5Venn diagram of transcripts (both identified and unknown) that were up- or down-regulated between seeds of 60 DAP vs 30 DAP (A) and 90 DAP vs 30 DAP (B). The “+” and “−” indicate up- and down-regulated transcripts, respectively. A total of 2133 transcripts were significantly (FDR < 0.05) expressed during developing seeds. 186: unique up-regulated transcripts in seeds of 60 DAP vs 30 DAP; 619: unique up-regulated transcripts in seeds of 90 DAP vs 30 DAP; 131: unique down-regulated transcripts in seeds of 60 DAP vs 30 DAP; 831: unique down-regulated transcripts in seeds of 90 DAP vs 30 DAP; 168: commonly up-regulated transcripts between seeds of 60 DAP vs 30 DAP and 90 DAP vs 30 DAP; 197: commonly down-regulated transcripts between seeds of 60 DAP vs 30 DAP and 90 DAP vs 30 DAP; 1: down-regulated in seeds of 60 DAP vs 30 DAP but up-regulated in seeds of 90 DAP vs 30 DAP.
Figure 6Tree peony sequences associated with fatty acid (A) and triacylglycerols (B) biosynthetic pathways. Lipid substrates are abbreviated: C16:0, palmitic acid; C16:1, hexadecenoic acid; C18:0, stearic acid; C18:1, oleic acid; C18:2, linoleic acid; C18:3, linolenic acid. Enzyme/protein abbreviations are: α-PDHC, pyruvate dehydrogenase alpha subunit; β-PDHC, pyruvate dehydrogenase beta subunit; DHLAT, dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase; LPD, dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase; α-CT, carboxyl transferase alpha subunit; β-CT, carboxyl transferase beta subunit; BC, biotin carboxylase; BCCP, biotin carboxyl carrier protein; MCAAT, malonyl-CoA ACP transacylase; ACP, acyl carrier protein; KAS I, II, III, ketoacyl-ACP synthase I, II, III; KAR, ketoacyl-ACP reductase; HAD, hydroxyacyl-ACP dehydrase; EAR, enoyl-ACP reductase; SAD, stearoyl-ACP desaturase; FAD6, oleate desaturase (chloroplast); FAD8, linoleate desaturase (chloroplast); FAD2, oleate desaturase (endoplasmic reticulum); FAD3, linoleate desaturase (microsomal); FATA/B, acyl-ACP thioesterase A/B; PCH, palmitoyl-CoA hydrolase; GPAT, glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase; LPAAT, 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase; PAP, phosphatidic acid phosphatase; DGAT1/2, acyl-CoA: diacylglycerolacyltransferase 1/2; PLA2/C, phospholipase A2/C; CK, choline kinase; CCT, choline-phosphate cytidylyltransferase; LPCAT, 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphocholine acyltransferase; EK, ethanolamine kinase; ECT, ethanolamine-phosphate cytidylyltransferase; LPEAT, 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphoethanolamine acyltransferase; PDAT, phospholipid:diacylglycerolacyltransferase; DAG-EPT, DAG-ethanolaminephosphotransferase.
Figure 7RT-PCR analysis of genes involved in fatty acid desaturation in seed at different developmental stages. Relative expression values, normalized to ubiquitin, were shown as 2−ΔΔCt relative to 10 DAP. Error bars represent the SD of three biological replicas with three technical replicas each.