Catarina N Matias1, Diana A Santos1, Pedro B Júdice1, João P Magalhães1, Cláudia S Minderico1, David A Fields2, Henry C Lukaski3, Luís B Sardinha1, Analiza M Silva4. 1. Exercise and Health Laboratory, CIPER, Faculdade Motricidade Humana, Universidade Lisboa, Estrada da Costa, 1499-002 Cruz-Quebrada, Portugal. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Medical Research Institute's Metabolic Research Program, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Norman, OK, USA. 3. Department of Kinesiology and Public Health Education, Hyslop Sports Center, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA. 4. Exercise and Health Laboratory, CIPER, Faculdade Motricidade Humana, Universidade Lisboa, Estrada da Costa, 1499-002 Cruz-Quebrada, Portugal. Electronic address: analiza@fmh.ulisboa.pt.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) equations can predict total body water (TBW) and extracellular water (ECW) in non-athletic healthy populations. This study aimed: a) to develop BIA-based models for TBW and ECW prediction based on dilution methods in a sample of national level athletes; and b) to validate the new models with a cross-validation approach in a separate cohort using dilution methods as criterion. METHODS: Two hundred and eight highly trained athletes (21.3 ± 5.0 years) were evaluated during their respective competitive seasons. Athletes were randomly split into development (n = 139) and validation groups (n = 69). The criterion method for TBW was deuterium dilution and for ECW was bromide dilution, where ICW was the respective difference between both. Resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) were obtained with a phase-sensitive 50 kHz BIA device and used for the estimation of TBW and ECW. RESULTS: Athletic BIA-based models were developed for TBW and ECW [TBW = 0.286 + 0.195*S(2)/R + 0.385*Wt + 5.086*Sex; ECW = 1.579 + 0.055*S(2)/R + 0.127*Wt + 0.006*S(2)/Xc + 0.932*Sex, where sex is 0 if female or 1 if male, Wt is weight (kg), S is stature (cm), and R and Xc are in ohm (Ω)]. Cross validation revealed R(2) of 0.91 for TBW and R(2) 0.70 for ECW and no mean bias. CONCLUSIONS: The new equations can be considered valid, with no observed bias, thus affording practical means to quantify TBW and ECW in national level athletes.
PURPOSE: Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) equations can predict total body water (TBW) and extracellular water (ECW) in non-athletic healthy populations. This study aimed: a) to develop BIA-based models for TBW and ECW prediction based on dilution methods in a sample of national level athletes; and b) to validate the new models with a cross-validation approach in a separate cohort using dilution methods as criterion. METHODS: Two hundred and eight highly trained athletes (21.3 ± 5.0 years) were evaluated during their respective competitive seasons. Athletes were randomly split into development (n = 139) and validation groups (n = 69). The criterion method for TBW was deuterium dilution and for ECW was bromide dilution, where ICW was the respective difference between both. Resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) were obtained with a phase-sensitive 50 kHz BIA device and used for the estimation of TBW and ECW. RESULTS: Athletic BIA-based models were developed for TBW and ECW [TBW = 0.286 + 0.195*S(2)/R + 0.385*Wt + 5.086*Sex; ECW = 1.579 + 0.055*S(2)/R + 0.127*Wt + 0.006*S(2)/Xc + 0.932*Sex, where sex is 0 if female or 1 if male, Wt is weight (kg), S is stature (cm), and R and Xc are in ohm (Ω)]. Cross validation revealed R(2) of 0.91 for TBW and R(2) 0.70 for ECW and no mean bias. CONCLUSIONS: The new equations can be considered valid, with no observed bias, thus affording practical means to quantify TBW and ECW in national level athletes.
Authors: Ana Isabel Laja García; Carmen Moráis-Moreno; Mª de Lourdes Samaniego-Vaesken; Ana M Puga; Gregorio Varela-Moreiras; Teresa Partearroyo Journal: Nutrients Date: 2019-11-07 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Francesco Campa; Catarina N Matias; Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Henry Lukaski; Jacopo Talluri; Stefania Toselli Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Marijan Spehnjak; Marko Gušić; Slavko Molnar; Mario Baić; Slobodan Andrašić; Musa Selimi; Draženka Mačak; Dejan M Madić; Suzana Žilič Fišer; Goran Sporiš; Nebojša Trajković Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Raquel D Langer; Juliano H Borges; Mauro A Pascoa; Vagner X Cirolini; Gil Guerra-Júnior; Ezequiel M Gonçalves Journal: Nutrients Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Francesco Campa; Analiza M Silva; Catarina N Matias; Cristina P Monteiro; Antonio Paoli; João Pedro Nunes; Jacopo Talluri; Henry Lukaski; Stefania Toselli Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Andreas M Kasper; Carl Langan-Evans; James F Hudson; Thomas E Brownlee; Liam D Harper; Robert J Naughton; James P Morton; Graeme L Close Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Marcus Vinicius de Oliveira Cattem; Bruna Taranto Sinforoso; Francesco Campa; Josely Correa Koury Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 3.390