Literature DB >> 25886689

The national trajectory project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder. Part 5: how essential are gender-specific forensic psychiatric services?

Tonia L Nicholls1, Anne G Crocker2, Michael C Seto3, Catherine M Wilson4, Yanick Charette5, Gilles Côté6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To state the sociodemographic characteristics, mental health histories, index offence characteristics, and criminal histories of male and female forensic psychiatric patients. Clinicians and researchers advocate that mental health and criminal justice organizations implement gender-specific services; however, few studies have sampled forensic patients to evaluate the extent to which men's and women's treatment and management needs are different.
METHOD: Data were collected from Review Board files from May 2000 to April 2005 in the 3 largest Canadian provinces. Using official criminal records, participants were followed for 3 to 8 years, until December 2008. The final sample comprised 1800 individuals: 15.6% were women and 84.4% were men.
RESULTS: There were few demographic differences, but women had higher psychosocial functioning than men. Both men and women had extensive mental health histories; women were more likely diagnosed with mood disorders and PDs and men were more likely diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and SUDs. The nature of the index offence did not differ by gender, except women were more likely to have perpetrated murders and attempted murders. For offences against a person, women were more likely to offend against offspring and partners and less likely to offend against strangers, compared with men. Women had significantly less extensive criminal histories than men.
CONCLUSIONS: Not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder-accused women have a distinct psychosocial, clinical, and criminological profile from their male counterparts, which may suggest gender-specific assessment, risk management, and treatment in forensic services could benefit patients. The findings are also consistent with traditional models (Risk-Need-Responsivity) and ultimately demonstrate the importance of individual assessment and client-centred services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25886689      PMCID: PMC4394713          DOI: 10.1177/070674371506000308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0706-7437            Impact factor:   4.356


  24 in total

1.  A clinical and demographic comparison between a forensic and a general sample of female patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Steffen Landgraf; Katrin Blumenauer; Michael Osterheider; Hedwig Eisenbarth
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.222

2.  The national trajectory project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in Canada. Part 1: context and methods.

Authors:  Anne G Crocker; Tonia L Nicholls; Michael C Seto; Gilles Côté; Yanick Charette; Malijai Caulet
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.356

3.  Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Kathleen R Merikangas; Ellen E Walters
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2005-06

4.  Substance abuse and personality disorders in homeless drop-in center clients: symptom severity and psychotherapy retention in a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Samuel A Ball; Patricia Cobb-Richardson; Adrian J Connolly; Cesar T Bujosa; Thomas W O'neall
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.735

5.  Gender and risk assessment accuracy: underestimating women's violence potential.

Authors:  Jennifer Skeem; Carol Schubert; Stephanie Stowman; Stacy Beeson; Edward Mulvey; William Gardner; Charles Lidz
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2005-04

6.  Posttraumatic stress disorder and psychiatric comorbidity among detained youths.

Authors:  Karen M Abram; Jason J Washburn; Linda A Teplin; Kristin M Emanuel; Erin G Romero; Gary M McClelland
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 7.  Disengagement from mental health services. A literature review.

Authors:  Aileen O'Brien; Rana Fahmy; Swaran P Singh
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 4.328

8.  Prison inmates' suicidal ideation in China: a study of gender differences and their impact.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Bin Liang; Yong Zhou; Wendy Brame
Journal:  Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol       Date:  2009-09-30

9.  A comparison of female versus male insanity acquittees in Colorado.

Authors:  A Seig; E Ball; J A Menninger
Journal:  Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law       Date:  1995

Review 10.  The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980-2013.

Authors:  Zachary Steel; Claire Marnane; Changiz Iranpour; Tien Chey; John W Jackson; Vikram Patel; Derrick Silove
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  8 in total

1.  A Valuable (and Ongoing) Study, the National Trajectory Project Addresses Many Myths About the Verdict of Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder.

Authors:  Patrick Baillie
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  The national trajectory project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in Canada.

Authors:  Anne G Crocker; Tonia L Nicholls; Michael C Seto; Gilles Côté
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.356

3.  The national trajectory project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in Canada. Part 1: context and methods.

Authors:  Anne G Crocker; Tonia L Nicholls; Michael C Seto; Gilles Côté; Yanick Charette; Malijai Caulet
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.356

4.  Changing characteristics of forensic psychiatric patients in Ontario: a population-based study from 1987 to 2012.

Authors:  Stephanie R Penney; Michael C Seto; Anne G Crocker; Tonia L Nicholls; Teresa Grimbos; Padraig L Darby; Alexander I F Simpson
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Research Priorities in Mental Health, Justice, and Safety: A Multidisciplinary Stakeholder Report.

Authors:  Anne G Crocker; Tonia L Nicholls; Michael C Seto; Laurence Roy; Marichelle C Leclair; Johann Brink; Alexander I F Simpson; Gilles Côté
Journal:  Int J Forensic Ment Health       Date:  2015-10-06

Review 6.  Female Forensic Patients May Be an Atypical Sub-type of Females Presenting Aggressive and Antisocial Behavior.

Authors:  Sheilagh Hodgins
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 7.  Just Like a Woman: Gender Role Stereotypes in Forensic Psychiatry.

Authors:  Saima Ali; Gwen Adshead
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 5.435

Review 8.  What do we know about the experience of seclusion in a forensic setting? An integrative literature review.

Authors:  Alison Hansen; Michael Hazelton; Robyn Rosina; Kerry Inder
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 5.100

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.