Réal Labelle1, Jean-Jacques Breton2, Claude Berthiaume3, Chantal Royer4, Sylvie Raymond5, Marilou Cournoyer6, Bogdan Balan6, Terry Zaloum6, Antoine Bibaud7, Geoffrey Gauvin7, Alain Janelle8. 1. Psychologist and Researcher, Clinique des troubles de l'humeur and Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Hôpital Rivière-des-Prairies, Montréal, Québec; Full Professor, Département de psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec; Associate Professor, Département de psychiatrie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec. 2. Psychiatrist and Researcher, Clinique des troubles de l'humeur and Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Hôpital Rivière-des-Prairies, Montréal, Québec; Associate Professor, Département de psychiatrie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec. 3. Statistician, Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Hôpital Rivière-des-Prairies, Montréal, Québec. 4. Full Professor, Département d'études en loisir, culture et tourisme, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec. 5. Psychiatric Nurse, Clinique des troubles de l'humeur, Hôpital Rivière-des-Prairies, Montréal, Québec. 6. Psychologist, Clinique des troubles de l'humeur, Hôpital Rivière-des-Prairies, Montréal, Québec. 7. Doctoral Candidate, Département de psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec. 8. Researcher, Clinique des troubles de l'humeur, Hôpital Rivière-des-Prairies, Montréal, Québec.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability of French versions of the Adolescent Coping Scale (ACS), the Reasons for Living Inventory for Adolescents (RFL-A), and the Spirituality Scale (SS); to examine the construct validity of these psychometric instruments; and to determine their convergent validity with French versions of the Life Events Questionnaire for Adolescents (LEQ-A), the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II), and the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) among French-Canadian adolescents. METHODS: Participants were 429 adolescents from high schools (n = 283) and the Mood Disorder Clinic (n = 146) in Montreal. The instruments were translated into French following the back-translation method. The internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach alpha coefficients. Exploratory analyses were conducted to document the content of their dimensions. Convergent validity was examined by correlating the ACS, the RFL-A, and the SS with the French versions of the LEQ-A, the BDI-II, and the BHS. RESULTS: The findings confirm that the ACS, RFL-A, and SS are psychometric instruments well suited to assess protective factors for depression and suicidal behaviour among French-speaking adolescents in community and clinical settings. However, results must be interpreted with some circumspection as 2 SS subscales obtained reliability coefficients in the moderate range only and the instructions for the RFL-A were reframed in response to ethical considerations. CONCLUSIONS: Our results add to those already available on the original English versions of the ACS, RFL-A, and SS and advance the knowledge of the psychometric properties of protective measures.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability of French versions of the Adolescent Coping Scale (ACS), the Reasons for Living Inventory for Adolescents (RFL-A), and the Spirituality Scale (SS); to examine the construct validity of these psychometric instruments; and to determine their convergent validity with French versions of the Life Events Questionnaire for Adolescents (LEQ-A), the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II), and the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) among French-Canadian adolescents. METHODS:Participants were 429 adolescents from high schools (n = 283) and the Mood Disorder Clinic (n = 146) in Montreal. The instruments were translated into French following the back-translation method. The internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach alpha coefficients. Exploratory analyses were conducted to document the content of their dimensions. Convergent validity was examined by correlating the ACS, the RFL-A, and the SS with the French versions of the LEQ-A, the BDI-II, and the BHS. RESULTS: The findings confirm that the ACS, RFL-A, and SS are psychometric instruments well suited to assess protective factors for depression and suicidal behaviour among French-speaking adolescents in community and clinical settings. However, results must be interpreted with some circumspection as 2 SS subscales obtained reliability coefficients in the moderate range only and the instructions for the RFL-A were reframed in response to ethical considerations. CONCLUSIONS: Our results add to those already available on the original English versions of the ACS, RFL-A, and SS and advance the knowledge of the psychometric properties of protective measures.
Authors: R E Dew; S S Daniel; D B Goldston; W V McCall; M Kuchibhatla; C Schleifer; M F Triplett; H G Koenig Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Alexandra Knafo; Jean-Marc Guilé; Jean-Jacques Breton; Réal Labelle; Vincent Belloncle; Nicolas Bodeau; Bernard Boudailliez; Sébastien Garny De La Rivière; Brahim Kharij; Christian Mille; Bojan Mirkovic; Cornelia Pripis; Johanne Renaud; Christine Vervel; David Cohen; Priscille Gérardin Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 4.356