Paola Portillo-Sanchez1, Fernando Bril1, Maryann Maximos1, Romina Lomonaco1, Diane Biernacki1, Beverly Orsak1, Sreevidya Subbarayan1, Amy Webb1, Joan Hecht1, Kenneth Cusi1. 1. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (P.P.S., F.B., M.M., R.L., S.S., K.C.), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610; Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (P.P.S., F.B., M.M., D.B., S.S., K.C.), Malcom Randall Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC), Gainesville, Florida 32608; Division of Diabetes (B.O., J.H., K.C.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78229; and Division of Diabetes (B.O., J.H., K.C.), and Division of Hepatology (A.W.), Audie L. Murphy VAMC, San Antonio, Texas 78229.
Abstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its more severe form with steatohepatitis (NASH) are common in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, they are usually believed to largely affect those with elevated aminotransferases. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of NAFLD by the gold standard, liver magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) in patients with T2DM and normal aminotransferases, and to characterize their metabolic profile. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We recruited 103 patients with T2DM and normal plasma aminotransferases (age, 60 ± 8 y; body mass index [BMI], 33 ± 5 kg/m(2); glycated hemoglobin [A1c], 7.6 ± 1.3%). We measured the following: 1) liver triglyceride content by (1)H-MRS; 2) systemic insulin sensitivity (homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance); and 3) adipose tissue insulin resistance, both fasting (as the adipose tissue insulin resistance index: fasting plasma free fatty acids [FFA] × insulin) and during an oral glucose tolerance test (as the suppression of FFA). RESULTS: The prevalence of NAFLD and NASH were much higher than expected (50% and 56% of NAFLD patients, respectively). The prevalence of NAFLD was higher in obese compared with nonobese patients as well as with increasing BMI (P = .001 for trend). Higher plasma A1c was associated with a greater prevalence of NAFLD and worse liver triglyceride accumulation (P = .01). Compared with nonobese patients without NAFLD, patients with NAFLD had severe systemic (liver/muscle) and, particularly, adipose tissue (fasting/postprandial) insulin resistance (all P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of NAFLD is much higher than previously believed in overweight/obese patients with T2DM and normal aminotransferases. Moreover, many are at increased risk of NASH. Physicians should have a lower threshold for screening patients with T2DM for NAFLD/NASH.
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE:Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its more severe form with steatohepatitis (NASH) are common in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, they are usually believed to largely affect those with elevated aminotransferases. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of NAFLD by the gold standard, liver magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) in patients with T2DM and normal aminotransferases, and to characterize their metabolic profile. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We recruited 103 patients with T2DM and normal plasma aminotransferases (age, 60 ± 8 y; body mass index [BMI], 33 ± 5 kg/m(2); glycated hemoglobin [A1c], 7.6 ± 1.3%). We measured the following: 1) liver triglyceride content by (1)H-MRS; 2) systemic insulin sensitivity (homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance); and 3) adipose tissue insulin resistance, both fasting (as the adipose tissue insulin resistance index: fasting plasma free fatty acids [FFA] × insulin) and during an oral glucose tolerance test (as the suppression of FFA). RESULTS: The prevalence of NAFLD and NASH were much higher than expected (50% and 56% of NAFLD patients, respectively). The prevalence of NAFLD was higher in obese compared with nonobese patients as well as with increasing BMI (P = .001 for trend). Higher plasma A1c was associated with a greater prevalence of NAFLD and worse liver triglyceride accumulation (P = .01). Compared with nonobese patients without NAFLD, patients with NAFLD had severe systemic (liver/muscle) and, particularly, adipose tissue (fasting/postprandial) insulin resistance (all P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of NAFLD is much higher than previously believed in overweight/obesepatients with T2DM and normal aminotransferases. Moreover, many are at increased risk of NASH. Physicians should have a lower threshold for screening patients with T2DM for NAFLD/NASH.
Authors: Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri; Jeanne M Clark; Nathan M Bass; Mark L Van Natta; Aynur Unalp-Arida; James Tonascia; Claudia O Zein; Elizabeth M Brunt; David E Kleiner; Arthur J McCullough; Arun J Sanyal; Anna Mae Diehl; Joel E Lavine; Naga Chalasani; Kris V Kowdley Journal: Hepatology Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Nathalie C Leite; Cristiane A Villela-Nogueira; Vera L N Pannain; Adriana C Bottino; Guilherme F M Rezende; Claudia R L Cardoso; Gil F Salles Journal: Liver Int Date: 2011-02-20 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Mariana Lazo; Ruben Hernaez; Mark S Eberhardt; Susanne Bonekamp; Ihab Kamel; Eliseo Guallar; Ayman Koteish; Frederick L Brancati; Jeanne M Clark Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Pouneh Mofrad; Melissa J Contos; Mahmadul Haque; Carol Sargeant; Robert A Fisher; Velimir A Luketic; Richard K Sterling; Mitchell L Shiffman; Richard T Stravitz; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: M Prashanth; H K Ganesh; M V Vima; M John; T Bandgar; Shashank R Joshi; S R Shah; P M Rathi; A S Joshi; Hemangini Thakkar; P S Menon; N S Shah Journal: J Assoc Physicians India Date: 2009-03
Authors: Ji Cheol Bae; Eun Jung Rhee; Won Young Lee; Se Eun Park; Cheol Young Park; Ki Won Oh; Sung Woo Park; Sun Woo Kim Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Bárbara L Riestra-Candelaria; Loida A González-Rodríguez; Wilma Rodriguez-Mojica; Luis E Vázquez-Quiñones; Juan Carlos Jorge Journal: J Diagn Med Sonogr Date: 2019-03-08
Authors: Nevin Ajluni; Rasimcan Meral; Adam H Neidert; Graham F Brady; Eric Buras; Barbara McKenna; Frank DiPaola; Thomas L Chenevert; Jeffrey F Horowitz; Colleen Buggs-Saxton; Amit R Rupani; Peedikayil E Thomas; Marwan K Tayeh; Jeffrey W Innis; M Bishr Omary; Hari Conjeevaram; Elif A Oral Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: M G Radaelli; F Martucci; S Perra; S Accornero; G Castoldi; G Lattuada; G Manzoni; G Perseghin Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2017-11-30 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: M Koch; S Freitag-Wolf; S Schlesinger; J Borggrefe; J R Hov; M K Jensen; J Pick; M R P Markus; T Höpfner; G Jacobs; S Siegert; A Artati; G Kastenmüller; W Römisch-Margl; J Adamski; T Illig; M Nothnagel; T H Karlsen; S Schreiber; A Franke; M Krawczak; U Nöthlings; W Lieb Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Nicola Veronese; Cyrus Cooper; Jean-Yves Reginster; Marc Hochberg; Jaime Branco; Olivier Bruyère; Roland Chapurlat; Nasser Al-Daghri; Elaine Dennison; Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont; Jean-François Kaux; Emmanuel Maheu; René Rizzoli; Roland Roth; Lucio C Rovati; Daniel Uebelhart; Mila Vlaskovska; André Scheen Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2019-01-11 Impact factor: 5.532