| Literature DB >> 25885897 |
Jianfang Zhu1, Yuanyuan Jin1, Kai Wang1, Yumiao Zhou2, Yue Feng3, Maihong Yu1, Xiaoqing Jin1.
Abstract
Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (R-fMRI) has been intensively used to assess alterations of inter-regional functional connectivity in patients with stroke, but the regional properties of brain activity in stroke have not yet been fully investigated. Additionally, no study has examined a frequency effect on such regional properties in stroke patients, although this effect has been shown to play important roles in both normal brain functioning and functional abnormalities. Here we utilized R-fMRI to measure the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) and regional homogeneity (ReHo), two major methods for characterizing the regional properties of R-fMRI, in three different frequency bands (slow-5: 0.01-0.027 Hz; slow-4: 0.027-0.73 Hz; and typical band: 0.01-0.1 Hz) in 19 stroke patients and 15 healthy controls. Both the ALFF and ReHo analyses revealed changes in brain activity in a number of brain regions, particularly the parietal cortex, in stroke patients compared with healthy controls. Remarkably, the regions with changed activity as detected by the slow-5 band data were more extensive, and this finding was true for both the ALFF and ReHo analyses. These results not only confirm previous studies showing abnormality in the parietal cortex in patients with stroke, but also suggest that R-fMRI studies of stroke should take frequency effects into account when measuring intrinsic brain activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25885897 PMCID: PMC4401774 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123850
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical and demographic data of 15 patients with stroke enrolled in this study.
| Case | Gender | Age (years) | Lesion | Time poststroke (weeks) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | 63 | FC.L,MCA.B | 2 |
| 2 | M | 62 | BG.L | 2 |
| 3 | F | 74 | BG.L | 2 |
| 4 | M | 63 | T-PC.R, MCA.R | 2 |
| 5 | M | 63 | BG.R, CR.R, Ins.R | 2 |
| 6 | M | 76 | T-OC.L, TC.L | 2.5 |
| 7 | M | 62 | BG.L | 2.5 |
| 8 | F | 72 | pons.L,BG.B,IC.B, Put.B, Tha.B | 3 |
| 9 | F | 81 | IC.L, Put.L, Tha.L | 3 |
| 10 | F | 59 | BG.L,FC.L | 3 |
| 11 | M | 69 | BG.L | 4 |
| 12 | M | 78 | BG.L, Tha.L, CR.L | 4 |
| 13 | F | 80 | IC.L, Put.L, Tha.L, BG.L | 4 |
| 14 | F | 75 | CR.R | 4 |
| 15 | F | 78 | F-PC.L,TS.BG | 4 |
Note: M, male; F, female; L, left; R, right; B, bilateral; BG, basal ganglia; IC, internal capsule; Put, putamen; Ins, insula; Tha, thalamus; CR, coronal radiate; T-PC, temporo-parietal cortex; MCA, middle cerebral artery; T-OC, temporo-occipital cortex; TC, temporal cortex; F-PC, fronto-parietal cortex; PC, parietal cortex; FC, frontal cortex.
Regions showing decreased ALFF in stroke patients versus normal controls.
| Brain regions | Hemisphere | CS (voxels) | Peak MNI | Maximum T |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full (0.01–0.1 Hz) | ||||
| MTG/MOG | R | 122 | 51,-57,3 | 6.14 |
| MOG/SOG | L | 98 | -21,-96,15 | 5.31 |
| PCu/SPL | R | 267 | 6,-75,42 | 6.67 |
| IPL/ANG | R | 102 | 36,-48,45 | 6.22 |
| MCG/PCu | L | 89 | -6,-42,54 | 6.03 |
| IPL/SPL | L | 121 | -33,-54,-60 | 5.31 |
| SPL/PCu | L | 131 | -15,-60,51 | 5.05 |
| Slow 5 (0.01–0.027 Hz) | ||||
| ITG/MOG | L | 135 | -60,-60,-21 | 5.02 |
| MTG/MOG/IOG | R | 206 | 54,-63,3 | 5.92 |
| SPL/PCu/MOG/SOG | B | 1206 | 18,-81,45 | 6.58 |
| Slow 4 (0.027–0.073 Hz) | ||||
| PCu/SPL | R | 159 | 6,-75,42 | 7.22 |
Note: MTG, middle temporal gyrus; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; SOG, superior occipital gyrus; PCu, precuneus; SPL, superior parietal lobule; IPL, inferior parietal lobule; ANG, angular gurus; MCG, middle cingulate gyrus; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; IOG, inferior occipital gyrus; L, left; R, right; B, bilateral; CS, cluster size.
Fig 1ALFF differences in three different frequency bands (A, typical band: 0.01–0.1 Hz; B, slow-5: 0.01–0.027 Hz; C, slow-4: 0.027–0.73 Hz) between stroke patients and healthy controls.
Cold colors indicate regions showing lower ALFF in patients versus the controls. Threshold for ALFF: p< 0.05 (corrected). Left in the figure shows the left side of the brain.
Regions showing increased ReHo in stroke patients versus normal controls.
| Brain regions | Hemisphere | CS (voxels) | Peak MNI | Maximum T |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full (0.01–0.1 Hz) | ||||
| SPL/PCu | L | 270 | 6,-75,42 | 6.2 |
| Slow 5 (0.01–0.027 Hz) | ||||
| SPL/IPL | L | 356 | -27,-51,51 | 6.96 |
| Slow 4 (0.027–0.073 Hz) | ||||
| SPL/PCu | L | 139 | -18,-69,54 | 5.96 |
Note: SPL, superior parietal lobule; PCu, precuneus; IPL, inferior parietal lobule; L, left; R, right hemisphere; CS, cluster size.
Fig 2ReHo differences in three different frequency bands (A, typical band: 0.01–0.1 Hz; B, slow-5: 0.01–0.027 Hz; C, slow-4: 0.027–0.73 Hz) between stroke patients and healthy controls.
Warm colors indicate regions showing higher ReHo in patients versus controls. Threshold for ReHo: p < 0.05 (corrected). Left in the figure shows the left side of the brain.
Fig 3Relationships between ALFF and ReHo for regions showing abnormal ALFF and ReHo in patients.
Significantly negative correlations were found between these two measures in stroke patients.