Literature DB >> 25885873

Comorbidity and intervention in octogenarians with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.

Manuel Martínez-Sellés1, Pablo Díez-Villanueva2, Domingo Sánchez-Sendin2, Amelia Carro Hevia3, Juan José Gómez Doblas4, Bernardo García de la Villa5, Luis Cornide6, Albert Alonso Tello7, Ramón Andión Ogando8, Tomás Ripoll Vera9, Antonio Arribas Jiménez10, Pilar Carrillo11, Carlos Rodríguez Pascual12, Maria Casares I Romeva13, Xavier Borras14, Sandra Vázquez2, Ramón López-Palop11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefit from intervention in elderly patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) and high comorbidity is unknown. Our aims were to establish the correlation between the Charlson comorbidity index and the prognosis of octogenarians with symptomatic sever AS and to identify patients who might not benefit from intervention.
METHODS: We used the data from PEGASO (Pronóstico de la Estenosis Grave Aórtica Sintomática del Octogenario--Prognosis of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in octogenarians), a prospective registry that included consecutively 928 patients aged ≥ 80 years with severe symptomatic AS.
RESULTS: The mean Charlson comorbidity index was 3.0 ± 1.7, a total of 151 patients (16.3%) presented high comorbidity (index ≥ 5). Median survival was lower for patients with high comorbidity than for those without (16.7 ± 1.2 vs. 26.5 ± 0.6 months, p < 0.001). In patients without high comorbidity planned interventional management was clearly associated with prognosis (log rank p < 0.001), which was not the case in patients with high comorbidity (log rank p > 0.10). In multivariate analysis, the only variables that were independently associated with prognosis were planned medical management and Charlson index. Patients with high comorbidity presented non-cardiac death more frequently than those who had not (28.6% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: One sixth of octogenarians with symptomatic severe AS have very high comorbidity (Charlson index ≥ 5). These patients have a poor prognosis in the short term and do not seem to benefit from interventional treatment.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Charlson; Elderly; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25885873     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  3 in total

1.  Post-TAVI outcomes: devil lies in the details.

Authors:  Ignacio J Amat-Santos; Pablo Díez-Villanueva; Javier López Diaz
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 5.682

2.  Patient- and Process-Related Contributors to the Underuse of Aortic Valve Replacement and Subsequent Mortality in Ambulatory Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Laura Flannery; Muhammad Etiwy; Alexander Camacho; Ran Liu; Nilay Patel; Arpi Tavil-Shatelyan; Varsha K Tanguturi; Jacob P Dal-Bianco; Evin Yucel; Rahul Sakhuja; Arminder S Jassar; Nathaniel B Langer; Ignacio Inglessis; Jonathan J Passeri; Judy Hung; Sammy Elmariah
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 6.106

3.  Importance of frailty and comorbidity in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Pablo Díez-Villanueva; Jorge Salamanca; Antonio Rojas; Fernando Alfonso
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.327

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.