| Literature DB >> 25885744 |
Piyumali K Perera1, Robin B Gasser2, David J Pulford3, Mark A Stevenson4, Simon M Firestone5, Andrew M J McFadden6, Abdul Jabbar7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oriental theileriosis is a tick-borne disease of bovines caused by the members of the Theileria orientalis complex. Recently, we developed a multiplexed tandem (MT) PCR to detect, differentiate and quantitate four genotypes (i.e., buffeli, chitose, ikeda and type 5) of T. orientalis. In this study, we used MT PCR to assess the prevalence and infection intensity of four T. orientalis genotypes in selected cattle herds that experienced oriental theileriosis outbreaks in New Zealand, and compared the sensitivities and specificities of MT PCR, PCR-high resolution melting (PCR-HRM) and a TaqMan qPCR.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25885744 PMCID: PMC4393603 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-015-0812-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Figure 1Map showing locations of the recent oriental theileriosis outbreaks occurred in North Island, New Zealand.
Apparent prevalence and infection intensity with genotypes of complex in New Zealand outbreaks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
| Auckland | 13 | Beef (6)/Dairy (4) | NR/ MO | 17 | 94.1 (16/17) | 100 (17/17) | 100 (17/17) | 94.1 (16/17) | 70.6 (12/17) | 100 (17/17) | 29.4 (5/17) | 381,134 | 15,466 | 209,763 | 10,939 |
| East Cape | 8 | Beef (7)/Dairy (1) | NR/MO | 18 | 44.4 (8/18) | 100 (18/18) | 100 (18/18) | 44.4 (8/18) | 77.8 (14/18) | 83.3 (15/18) | 22.2 (4/18) | 64,727 | 27,164 | 68,263 | 9 |
| Northland | 14 | Beef (5)/Dairy (9) | NR/MO/ANT | 32 | 100 (32/32) | 100 (32/32) | 100 (32/32) | 100 (32/32) | 87.5 (28/32) | 100 (32/32) | 53.1 (17/32) | 237,979 | 129,868 | 159,724 | 15,823 |
| Waikato | 62 | Beef (5)/Dairy (56) | NR/MO/ANT/SO | 87 | 90.8 (79/87) | 98.9 (86/87) | 98.9 (86/87) | 90.7 (78/86) | 31.4 (27/86) | 100 (86/86) | 3.5 (3/86) | 420,479 | 57,012 | 186,854 | 859 |
|
| 97 | Beef (23)/Dairy (70) | 154 | 87.7 (135/154) | 99.4 (153/154) | 99.4 (153/154) | 87.6 (134/153) | 52.9 (81/153) | 98.0 (150/153) | 19.0 (29/153) | 349,271 | 70,684 | 170,786 | 11,252 | |
|
| |||||||||||||||
| Southland | 9 | Beef (9) | NR | 88 | 0% (0/88) | 2.3% (2/88) | 2.3% (2/88) | 0 | 100 (2/2) | 100 (2/2) | 100 (2/2) | 0 | 6,916 | 7,694 | 22 |
a n denotes the number of farms sampled. For some farms the farm type (dairy or beef) information were not collected.
bDisease groups were categorized according to clinical signs and haematological parameters. ‘NR’, ‘ANT’, ‘MO’ and ‘SO’ denote no disease reported, anaemia negative Theileria (i.e., anaemia not observed but Theileria piroplasms were observed on blood smears), moderate outbreak (i.e., more than one animal with anaemia) and severe outbreak (i.e., with multiple deaths), respectively.
Figure 2Prevalence of genotypes of the complex detected by the MT PCR assay. Letters ‘C’, ‘B’, ‘I’ and ‘T’ denote single infections by genotypes chitose, buffeli, ikeda and type 5, respectively. Various combinations of letters with the sign ‘+’ denote mixed infections with two or more genotypes.
Prevalence and intensities of genotypes detected using MT PCR in three anaemic categories
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Severe anaemiab (49) | 100 (49/49) | 34.7 (17/49) | 100 (49/49) | 8.2 (4/49) | 445,347 | 68,915 | 157,443 | 88 |
| Mild anaemiac (31) | 93.5(29/31) | 38.7 (12/31) | 96.8 (30/31) | 16.1 (5/31) | 429,380 | 167,705 | 260,844 | 9,518 |
| No anaemiad (50) | 66 (33/50) | 70 (35/50) | 92 (46/50) | 26 (13/50) | 240,359 | 44,838 | 134,136 | 1,558 |
a n, number of animals.
bSevere anaemia was defined if haematocrit value was < 0.15.
cMild anaemia was defined if haematocrit value was 0.15-0.24.
dNo anaemia was defined if haematocrit value was > 0.24.
(Haematocrit data were available for only 130 individuals of the tested 154 cattle from North Island).
Comparisons of intensities of four genotypes of among three anaemic categories
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Severe anaemiad (49) | 0.510 ± 0.20 | 0.129, 0.892 | 0.009 |
| Mild anaemiae (29) | 0.323 ± 0.22 | -0.109, 0.755 | 0.143 | |
| No anaemiaf (33) | Reference group | |||
|
| Severe anaemiad (17) | 0.005 ± 0.28 | -0.546, 0.556 | 0.986 |
| Mild anaemiae (12) | 0.238 ± 0.32 | -0.386, 0.861 | 0.455 | |
| No anaemiaf (35) | Reference group | |||
|
| Severe anaemiad (49) | 0.120 ± 0.14 | -0.153, 0.393 | 0.390 |
| Mild anaemiae (30) | 0.199 ± 0.16 | -0.113, 0.511 | 0.212 | |
| No anaemiaf (46) | Reference group | |||
|
| Severe anaemiad (4) | -0.066 ± 0.58 | -1.193, 1.061 | 0.909 |
| Mild anaemiae (5) | 1.442 ± 0.53 | 0.405, 2.479 | 0.006 | |
| No anaemiaf (13) | Reference group | |||
a n, number of animals.
bSE, standard error.
cCI, confidence interval.
dSevere anaemia was defined if haematocrit value was < 0.15.
eMild anaemia was defined if haematocrit value was 0.15-0.24.
fNo anaemia was defined if haematocrit value was > 0.24.
Comparisons of intensities of genotypes and within each anaemic category
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Severe anaemiad (49) |
| 252,860 | 445,347 | 0.403 (0.34, 0.47) | < 0.001 |
| (247, 2242,034) | |||||
|
| 108,368 | 157,443 | Reference group | ||
| (680, 901,132) | |||||
| Mild anaemiae (29) |
| 237,140 | 429,380 | 0.112 (-0.16, 0.39) | 0.408 |
| (1,925, 2718,117) | |||||
|
| 95,313 | 269,257 | Reference group | ||
| (2,456, 3,698,674) | |||||
| No anaemiaf (33) |
| 74,688 | 240,359 | -0.076 (-0.32, 0.17) | 0.532 |
| (387, 3090,431) | |||||
|
| 78,619 | 141,731 | Reference group | ||
| (1,212, 1164,903) | |||||
a n, number of animals.
bmin, minimum; max, maximum.
cCI, confidence interval.
dSevere anaemia was defined if haematocrit value was < 0.15.
eMild anaemia was defined if haematocrit value was 0.15-0.24.
fNo anaemia was defined if haematocrit value was > 0.24.
Diagnostic test performance of MT PCR and Ikeda TaqMan® qPCR
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
| |
| Diagnostic sensitivity (%) | 98.0 (94.6, 99.6) |
| Diagnostic specificity (%) | 98.9 (96.4, 99.8) |
|
| |
| Diagnostic sensitivity (%) | 97.1 (94.2, 98.8) |
| Diagnostic specificity (%) | 97.4 (95.1, 98.8) |
|
| |
| Group 1 (%) | 88.1 (82.5, 93.1) |
| Group 2 (%) | 0 (0, 0.12) |
|
| |
| PABAK in group 1 | 94.0 (89.0, 97.2) |
| PABAK in group 2 | 94.1 (88.0, 97.7) |
|
| |
|
| 0.371 (0.004, 0.764) |
|
| 0.226 (-0.006, 0.674) |
|
| |
| pD | 7.6 |
| DIC | 28.4 |
The diagnostic sensitivity of the MT PCR was defined based on a cut-off of ≥ 1 DNA copies.
aPI, probability interval.
b ρ+ is the conditional correlation between MT and Ikeda TaqMan® qPCRs for infected animals, and ρ- is the conditional correlation for uninfected animals.
PABAK = prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted Cohen’s kappa (ĸ) statistic.
pD = effective dimension (model complexity).
DIC = Deviance information criterion, a generalisation of Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC).
Diagnostic test performance of MT PCR and HRM analysis
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
| |
| Diagnostic sensitivity (%) | 98.9 (97.0, 99.8) |
| Diagnostic specificity (%) | 97.8 (94.5, 99.3) |
|
| |
| Diagnostic sensitivity (%) | 97.6 (95.6, 99.0) |
| Diagnostic specificity (%) | 96.5 (94.3, 98.3) |
|
| |
| Group 1 (%) | 98.2 (95.5, 99.6) |
| Group 2 (%) | 0 (0, 2.14) |
|
| |
| PABAK in group 1 | 95.2 (90.2, 98.0) |
| PABAK in group 2 | 94.0 (87.3, 97.9) |
|
| |
|
| 0.301 (0.006, 0.715) |
|
| 0.480 (0.106, 0.772) |
|
| |
| pD | 12.8 |
| DIC | 35.1 |
The diagnostic sensitivity of the MT PCR was defined based on a cut-off of ≥ 1 DNA copies.
aPI, probability interval.
b ρ+ is the conditional correlation between MT PCR and PCR-HRM outcomes for infected animals, and ρ- is the conditional correlation for uninfected animals.
PABAK = prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted Cohen’s kappa (ĸ) statistic.
pD = effective dimension (model complexity).
DIC = Deviance information criterion, a generalisation of Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC).