Elizabeth L Stegemöller1, Peter Schmidt2, Chris Hass3, Irene Malaty3, Michael S Okun3. 1. Department of Kinesiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA; University of Florida Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Gainesville, FL. Electronic address: esteg@iastate.edu. 2. National Parkinson Foundation, Miami, FL. 3. University of Florida Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Gainesville, FL.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine (1) the relationship between assisted timed Up and Go (TUG) performance and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), and (2) whether adjusting the TUG score (adding time) improves the relationship between TUG performance and the PDQ-39 in persons with Parkinson disease (PD) who use assistive devices or push off, or both. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Twenty participating National Parkinson Foundation Centers of Excellence. PARTICIPANTS: Data were obtained from participants (N=6624) without exclusion at the 20 participating sites. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The relationship between TUG scores and PDQ-39 mobility scores was determined using the method of linear least squares. Adjusted scores were determined through minimizing the sum of the squared error. RESULTS: The correlation between assisted TUG scores and PDQ-39 mobility scores was slightly lower (R(2)=.384) compared with the correlation between nonassisted TUG scores and PDQ-39 mobility scores (R(2)=.409). Adjusting assisted TUG performance scores for push off and for use of an assistive device resulted in a modest increase in correlation (R(2)=.399). CONCLUSIONS: Applying adjustments to assisted TUG may provide clinically important information for evaluating balance, mobility, and falls, and for determining the most effective therapeutic strategies for persons with PD.
OBJECTIVES: To determine (1) the relationship between assisted timed Up and Go (TUG) performance and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), and (2) whether adjusting the TUG score (adding time) improves the relationship between TUG performance and the PDQ-39 in persons with Parkinson disease (PD) who use assistive devices or push off, or both. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Twenty participating National Parkinson Foundation Centers of Excellence. PARTICIPANTS: Data were obtained from participants (N=6624) without exclusion at the 20 participating sites. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The relationship between TUG scores and PDQ-39 mobility scores was determined using the method of linear least squares. Adjusted scores were determined through minimizing the sum of the squared error. RESULTS: The correlation between assisted TUG scores and PDQ-39 mobility scores was slightly lower (R(2)=.384) compared with the correlation between nonassisted TUG scores and PDQ-39 mobility scores (R(2)=.409). Adjusting assisted TUG performance scores for push off and for use of an assistive device resulted in a modest increase in correlation (R(2)=.399). CONCLUSIONS: Applying adjustments to assisted TUG may provide clinically important information for evaluating balance, mobility, and falls, and for determining the most effective therapeutic strategies for persons with PD.
Authors: Miriam R Rafferty; Peter N Schmidt; Sheng T Luo; Kan Li; Connie Marras; Thomas L Davis; Mark Guttman; Fernando Cubillos; Tanya Simuni Journal: J Parkinsons Dis Date: 2017 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Leili Shahgholi; Sol De Jesus; Samuel S Wu; Qinglin Pei; Anhar Hassan; Melissa J Armstrong; Daniel Martinez-Ramirez; Peter Schmidt; Michael S Okun Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 3.240