Literature DB >> 25883004

Tissue-engineered bone with 3-dimensionally printed β-tricalcium phosphate and polycaprolactone scaffolds and early implantation: an in vivo pilot study in a porcine mandible model.

Sandra Konopnicki1, Basel Sharaf2, Cory Resnick3, Adam Patenaude4, Tracy Pogal-Sussman5, Kyung-Gyun Hwang6, Harutsugi Abukawa7, Maria J Troulis8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Deep bone penetration into implanted scaffolds remains a challenge in tissue engineering. The purpose of this study was to evaluate bone penetration depth within 3-dimensionally (3D) printed β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds, seeded with porcine bone marrow progenitor cells (pBMPCs), and implanted early in vivo.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Scaffolds were 3D printed with 50% β-TCP and 50% PCL. The pBMPCs were harvested, isolated, expanded, and differentiated into osteoblasts. Cells were seeded into the scaffolds and constructs were incubated in a rotational oxygen-permeable bioreactor system for 14 days. Six 2- × 2-cm defects were created in each mandible (N = 2 minipigs). In total, 6 constructs were placed within defects and 6 defects were used as controls (unseeded scaffolds, n = 3; empty defects, n = 3). Eight weeks after surgery, specimens were harvested and analyzed by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), and CD31 staining. Analysis included cell counts, bone penetration, and angiogenesis at the center of the specimens.
RESULTS: All specimens (N = 12) showed bone formation similar to native bone at the periphery. Of 6 constructs, 4 exhibited bone formation in the center. Histomorphometric analysis of the H&amp;E-stained sections showed an average of 22.1% of bone in the center of the constructs group compared with 1.87% in the unseeded scaffolds (P < .05). The 2 remaining constructs, which did not display areas of mature bone in the center, showed massive cell penetration depth by DAPI staining, with an average of 2,109 cells/0.57 mm(2) in the center compared with 1,114 cells/0.57 mm(2) in the controls (P < .05). CD31 expression was greater in the center of the constructs compared with the unseeded scaffolds (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: 3D printed β-TCP and PCL scaffolds seeded with pBMPCs and implanted early into porcine mandibular defects display good bone penetration depth. Further study with a larger sample and larger bone defects should be performed before human applications.
Copyright © 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25883004     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  13 in total

Review 1.  Application of selected scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sepanta Hosseinpour; Mitra Ghazizadeh Ahsaie; Maryam Rezai Rad; Mohammad Taghi Baghani; Saeed Reza Motamedian; Arash Khojasteh
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-02-13

2.  3D Printing of Personalized Artificial Bone Scaffolds.

Authors:  Shailly H Jariwala; Gregory S Lewis; Zachary J Bushman; James H Adair; Henry J Donahue
Journal:  3D Print Addit Manuf       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.449

3.  Designing Biomaterials for 3D Printing.

Authors:  Murat Guvendiren; Joseph Molde; Rosane M D Soares; Joachim Kohn
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2016-04-13

Review 4.  Tissue engineering applications in otolaryngology-The state of translation.

Authors:  Weston L Niermeyer; Cole Rodman; Michael M Li; Tendy Chiang
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-19

5.  Polymer-Ceramic Composite Scaffolds: The Effect of Hydroxyapatite and β-tri-Calcium Phosphate.

Authors:  Boyang Huang; Guilherme Caetano; Cian Vyas; Jonny James Blaker; Carl Diver; Paulo Bártolo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-14       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 6.  Reconstruction of Craniomaxillofacial Bone Defects Using Tissue-Engineering Strategies with Injectable and Non-Injectable Scaffolds.

Authors:  Bipin Gaihre; Suren Uswatta; Ambalangodage C Jayasuriya
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2017-11-20

Review 7.  Current development of biodegradable polymeric materials for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Richard Song; Maxwell Murphy; Chenshuang Li; Kang Ting; Chia Soo; Zhong Zheng
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.162

8.  Biofabrication of SDF-1 Functionalized 3D-Printed Cell-Free Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Alina Lauer; Philipp Wolf; Dorothea Mehler; Hermann Götz; Mehmet Rüzgar; Andreas Baranowski; Dirk Henrich; Pol Maria Rommens; Ulrike Ritz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Ex Vivo and In Vivo Analyses of Novel 3D-Printed Bone Substitute Scaffolds Incorporating Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Granules for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Franciska Oberdiek; Carlos Ivan Vargas; Patrick Rider; Milijana Batinic; Oliver Görke; Milena Radenković; Stevo Najman; Jose Manuel Baena; Ole Jung; Mike Barbeck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Three-dimensionally printed polycaprolactone/beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold was more effective as an rhBMP-2 carrier for new bone formation than polycaprolactone alone.

Authors:  Su A Park; Hyo-Jung Lee; Sung-Yeol Kim; Keun-Suh Kim; Deuk-Won Jo; Shin-Young Park
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 4.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.