Literature DB >> 25882916

Induction of labor at full term in uncomplicated singleton gestations: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.

Gabriele Saccone1, Vincenzo Berghella2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of cesarean and any maternal and perinatal effects of a policy induction of labor in uncomplicated full-term singleton gestations. Searches were performed in an electronic database with the use of a combination of text words related to "induction" and "cesarean section" from inception of each database through December 2014. We included all randomized controlled trials of uncomplicated singleton gestations at full term (ie, between 39 weeks 0/7 days and 40 weeks 6/7 days) with intact membranes randomized to induction of labor or control (ie, expectant management). The primary outcome was the incidence of cesarean delivery. The summary measures were reported as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Five randomized controlled trials, including 844 women, were analyzed. Full-term vertex singleton gestations receiving induction of labor had similar incidence of cesarean delivery compared to controls (9.7% vs 7.5%; RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.75-2.08). Rates of spontaneous (75.9% vs 80.2%; RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.87-1.02) and operative (13.1% vs 10.6%; RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.83-1.81) vaginal delivery were also similar. Induction was associated with similar rates of chorioamnionitis (9.6% vs 8.0%; RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.38-3.39), but statistically significantly less blood loss (mean difference -57.59 mL; 95% CI, -83.96 to -31.21) compared to controls. Regarding neonatal outcomes, induction was associated with a significantly lower rate of meconium-stained amniotic fluid (4.0% vs 13.5%; RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18-0.57) and significantly lower mean birthweight (mean difference -135.51 g; 95% CI, -205.24 to -65.77) compared to control group. Induction of labor at full term in uncomplicated singleton gestations is not associated with increased risk of cesarean delivery and has overall similar outcomes compared to expectant management.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean delivery; induction; labor

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25882916     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

1.  Healthy Birth Practice #1: Let Labor Begin on Its Own.

Authors:  Debby Amis
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2019-04-01

Review 2.  American College of Nurse-Midwives Clinical Bulletin Number 18: Induction of Labor.

Authors:  Nicole Smith Carlson; Alexis Dunn Amore; Jessica Ann Ellis; Katie Page; Robyn Schafer
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 2.891

3.  Implementation of the WHO manual for Robson classification: an example from Sri Lanka using a local database for developing quality improvement recommendations.

Authors:  Hemantha Senanayake; Monica Piccoli; Emanuelle Pessa Valente; Caterina Businelli; Rishard Mohamed; Roshini Fernando; Anshumalie Sakalasuriya; Fathima Reshma Ihsan; Benedetta Covi; Humphrey Wanzira; Marzia Lazzerini
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Prediction of emergency cesarean section by measurable maternal and fetal characteristics.

Authors:  Ping Guan; Fei Tang; Guoqiang Sun; Wei Ren
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Induction of labour at or near term for suspected fetal macrosomia.

Authors:  Michel Boulvain; Olivier Irion; Therese Dowswell; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-22

6.  Neonatal and Maternal Composite Adverse Outcomes Among Low-Risk Nulliparous Women Compared With Multiparous Women at 39-41 Weeks of Gestation.

Authors:  Suneet P Chauhan; Madeline Murguia Rice; William A Grobman; Jennifer Bailit; Uma M Reddy; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Steve N Caritis; Mona Prasad; Alan T N Tita; George R Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Jorge E Tolosa
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 7.623

7.  Caesarean section following induction of labour in uncomplicated first births- a population-based cross-sectional analysis of 42,950 births.

Authors:  Mary-Ann Davey; James King
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: The impact on maternal and neonatal risk.

Authors:  Rachel G Sinkey; Jasmin Lacevic; Tea Reljic; Iztok Hozo; Kelly S Gibson; Anthony O Odibo; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Charles J Lockwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Benefits and risks of induction of labor at 39 or more weeks in uncomplicated nulliparous women: a retrospective, observational study.

Authors:  Hye In Kim; Sung Pil Choo; Sang Won Han; Eui Hyeok Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2018-11-28

10.  Comparison of Dinoprostone and Oxytocin for the Induction of Labor in Late-Term Pregnancy and the Rate of Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Study in Ten Centers in South China.

Authors:  Yanxing Wei; Xueyuan Li; Yinhui Zhang; Yuewen Guo; Baomin Yin; Dunjin Chen; Yi Chen; Yanping Yu; Bin Zhu; Yiwei Qin; Jianping Zhang; Zhijian Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-11-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.