Literature DB >> 25882439

Exaggerated male genitalia intensify interspecific reproductive interference by damaging heterospecific female genitalia.

D Kyogoku1, T Sota1.   

Abstract

Male-male competition over fertilization can select for harmful male genital structures that reduce the fitness of their mates, if the structures increase the male's fertilization success. During secondary contact between two allopatrically formed, closely related species, harmful male genitalia may also reduce the fitness of heterospecific females given interspecific copulation. We performed a laboratory experiment to determine whether the extent of genital spine exaggeration in Callosobruchus chinensis males affects the fitness of C. maculatus females by injuring their reproductive organs. We found that males with more exaggerated genital spines were more likely to injure the females via interspecific copulation and that the genital injury translated into fecundity loss. Thus, as predicted, reproductive interference by C. chinensis males on C. maculatus females is mediated by exaggeration of the genital spine, which is the evolutionary consequence of intraspecific male-male competition. Harmful male traits, such as genital spines, might generally affect the extent of interaction between closely related species.
© 2015 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2015 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Callosobruchus; genital spine; heterospecific mating; interspecific copulation; post-copulatory sexual selection; sexual conflict; sperm competition; traumatic mating

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25882439     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  10 in total

Review 1.  An alternative hypothesis for the evolution of same-sex sexual behaviour in animals.

Authors:  Julia D Monk; Erin Giglio; Ambika Kamath; Max R Lambert; Caitlin E McDonough
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 15.460

2.  Interspecific introgression reveals a role of male genital morphology during the evolution of reproductive isolation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Stephen R Frazee; Angelica R Harper; Mehrnaz Afkhami; Michelle L Wood; John C McCrory; John P Masly
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Reproductive interference by male Drosophila subobscura on female D. persimilis: A laboratory experiment.

Authors:  Brenda Manzano-Winkler; Alexander J Hish; Emily K Aarons; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Frequent misdirected courtship in a natural community of colorful Habronattus jumping spiders.

Authors:  Lisa A Taylor; Erin C Powell; Kevin J McGraw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Does past evolutionary history under different mating regimes influence the demographic dynamics of interspecific competition?

Authors:  Daisuke Kyogoku; Michio Kondoh; Teiji Sota
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Reproductive interference hampers species coexistence despite conspecific sperm precedence.

Authors:  Ryosuke Iritani; Suzuki Noriyuki
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 7.  Reproductive interference and Satyrisation: mechanisms, outcomes and potential use for insect control.

Authors:  Christina Mitchell; Stewart Leigh; Luke Alphey; Wilfried Haerty; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  J Pest Sci (2004)       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  A generalized population dynamics model for reproductive interference with absolute density dependence.

Authors:  Daisuke Kyogoku; Teiji Sota
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Successful mating and hybridisation in two closely related flatworm species despite significant differences in reproductive morphology and behaviour.

Authors:  Pragya Singh; Daniel N Ballmer; Max Laubscher; Lukas Schärer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Reproductive Costs for Hybridizing Female Anasa tristis (Hemiptera: Coreidae), but No Evidence of Selection Against Interspecific Mating.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hamel; Emma E Eskeland; Tyler K Lehmann; Paige L Stover
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 1.857

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.