Literature DB >> 25882420

Critical evaluation of a simple retention time predictor based on LogKow as a complementary tool in the identification of emerging contaminants in water.

Richard Bade1, Lubertus Bijlsma1, Juan V Sancho1, Felix Hernández2.   

Abstract

There has been great interest in environmental analytical chemistry in developing screening methods based on liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) for emerging contaminants. Using HRMS, compound identification relies on the high mass resolving power and mass accuracy attainable by these analyzers. When dealing with wide-scope screening, retention time prediction can be a complementary tool for the identification of compounds, and can also reduce tedious data processing when several peaks appear in the extracted ion chromatograms. There are many in silico, Quantitative Structure-Retention Relationship methods available for the prediction of retention time for LC. However, most of these methods use commercial software to predict retention time based on various molecular descriptors. This paper explores the applicability and makes a critical discussion on a far simpler and cheaper approach to predict retention times by using LogKow. The predictor was based on a database of 595 compounds, their respective LogKow values and a chromatographic run time of 18min. Approximately 95% of the compounds were found within 4.0min of their actual retention times, and 70% within 2.0min. A predictor based purely on pesticides was also made, enabling 80% of these compounds to be found within 2.0min of their actual retention times. To demonstrate the utility of the predictors, they were successfully used as an additional tool in the identification of 30 commonly found emerging contaminants in water. Furthermore, a comparison was made by using different mass extraction windows to minimize the number of false positives obtained.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emerging contaminants; Liquid chromatography; Pesticides; Retention time prediction; Time-of-Flight mass spectrometry; Water

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25882420     DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.02.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Talanta        ISSN: 0039-9140            Impact factor:   6.057


  10 in total

1.  A comparison of three liquid chromatography (LC) retention time prediction models.

Authors:  Andrew D McEachran; Kamel Mansouri; Seth R Newton; Brandiese E J Beverly; Jon R Sobus; Antony J Williams
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 6.057

2.  Prediction of Chromatography Conditions for Purification in Organic Synthesis Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Mantas Vaškevičius; Jurgita Kapočiūtė-Dzikienė; Liudas Šlepikas
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Screening of additives in plastics with high resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry and different ionization sources: direct probe injection (DIP)-APCI, LC-APCI, and LC-ion booster ESI.

Authors:  Ana Ballesteros-Gómez; Tim Jonkers; Adrian Covaci; Jacob de Boer
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  The First Attempt at Non-Linear in Silico Prediction of Sampling Rates for Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Samplers (POCIS).

Authors:  Thomas H Miller; Jose A Baz-Lomba; Christopher Harman; Malcolm J Reid; Stewart F Owen; Nicolas R Bury; Kevin V Thomas; Leon P Barron
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Suspect and non-target screening of chemicals in clothing textiles by reversed-phase liquid chromatography/hybrid quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Josefine Carlsson; Francesco Iadaresta; Jonas Eklund; Rozanna Avagyan; Conny Östman; Ulrika Nilsson
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 6.  Insight into chemical basis of traditional Chinese medicine based on the state-of-the-art techniques of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Yang Yu; Changliang Yao; De-An Guo
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 11.413

7.  MetFrag relaunched: incorporating strategies beyond in silico fragmentation.

Authors:  Christoph Ruttkies; Emma L Schymanski; Sebastian Wolf; Juliane Hollender; Steffen Neumann
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 5.514

8.  "MS-Ready" structures for non-targeted high-resolution mass spectrometry screening studies.

Authors:  Andrew D McEachran; Kamel Mansouri; Chris Grulke; Emma L Schymanski; Christoph Ruttkies; Antony J Williams
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 5.514

Review 9.  Mass spectrometric strategies for the investigation of biomarkers of illicit drug use in wastewater.

Authors:  Félix Hernández; Sara Castiglioni; Adrian Covaci; Pim de Voogt; Erik Emke; Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern; Christoph Ort; Malcolm Reid; Juan V Sancho; Kevin V Thomas; Alexander L N van Nuijs; Ettore Zuccato; Lubertus Bijlsma
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 10.946

10.  Predicting reversed-phase liquid chromatographic retention times of pesticides by deep neural networks.

Authors:  Julien Parinet
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-12-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.