Literature DB >> 25882327

Long term patient-reported benefit from ptosis surgery.

N Maycock1, C MacGregor1, D A Saunders1, B Parkin1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the long term impact of ptosis surgery on health-related quality-of-life using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) patient-reported outcome measure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective case note review was carried out on all patients who had undergone ptosis surgery (6 November 2008 to 5 December 2010) by one surgeon at Royal Bournemouth Hospital. Patient demographics, surgical technique, and complications were recorded. The GBI questionnaire data was obtained by telephone interview.
RESULTS: A total of 62 ptosis operations (33 right, 29 left, of which 18 were bilateral) on 44 patients; 20 male, 24 female were included. Median age 77 years (range: 17-95 years). One wound dehiscence occurred, but no redo ptosis procedures were required. GBI data was obtained on 32 patients (45 ptosis procedures) at a mean follow-up period of 42.8 months postoperatively (range 31-67 months). The mean total GBI score for ptosis surgery was +21.36 (range 0-58.33; 95% confidence interval: 17.28-25.43, P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Patients derived a highly significant benefit to their health-related quality-of-life from ptosis surgery measured by the GBI that was maintained for up to 5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25882327      PMCID: PMC4506338          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2015.54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  10 in total

1.  Standardised clinical photography in ophthalmic plastic surgery.

Authors:  M S Bajaj; N Pushker; A Mahindrakar; R Balasubramanya
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Comparison of external and endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  M Feretis; J R Newton; B Ram; F Green
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 1.469

3.  Symptom score questionnaire for nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults--a novel tool to assess the outcome after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Grigori Smirnov; Henri Tuomilehto; Hannu Kokki; Tatu Kemppainen; Vesa Kiviniemi; Juhani Nuutinen; Kai Kaarniranta; Juha Seppa
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Standardized clinical photography: the role of flash.

Authors:  Angelino Cariello; Giovanni André Viana; Midori Osaki; André Luis Pamplona; Ana Luisa Höfling-Lima
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.746

5.  Quality of life assessment after non-laser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  A Ho; R Sachidananda; S Carrie; C Neoh
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.597

6.  Patient-reported benefit from oculoplastic surgery.

Authors:  H B Smith; S B Jyothi; O A R Mahroo; P N Shams; M Sira; S Dey; T Adewoyin; V T F Cheung; C A Jones
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Quality of life outcomes following dacryocystorhinostomy: external and endonasal laser techniques compared.

Authors:  S J. Bakri; A S. Carney; K Robinson; N S. Jones; R N. Downes
Journal:  Orbit       Date:  1999-06

8.  The impact of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), on patient health status as assessed by the Glasgow benefit inventory.

Authors:  P M Spielmann; I Hathorn; F Ahsan; A J Cain; P S White
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.681

9.  Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy.

Authors:  K Robinson; S Gatehouse; G G Browning
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Outcomes of ptosis surgery assessed using a patient-reported outcome measure: an exploration of time effects.

Authors:  Omar A Mahroo; Pirro G Hysi; Sarju Dey; Elizabeth A Gavin; Christopher J Hammond; Carole A Jones
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 4.638

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Assessment of patient-reported outcome and quality of life improvement following surgery for epiphora.

Authors:  Z Sipkova; O Vonica; O Olurin; E E Obi; A R Pearson
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Anterior approach white line advancement: technique and long-term outcomes in the correction of blepharoptosis.

Authors:  C B Schulz; R Nicholson; A Penwarden; B Parkin
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Patient reported psychosocial functioning following successful ptosis surgery.

Authors:  H S Richards; E Jenkinson; P White; R A Harrad
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.456

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.