Joshua Khalili1, Lucinda B Leung, Allison L Diamant. 1. At the time of the study, Joshua Khalili was a medical student at the David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles. Lucinda B. Leung was a resident in the Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine. Allison L. Diamant was with the Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We assessed the existence of procedures and policies for identifying lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT)-competent physicians at US academic faculty practices, and sought to identify physician training programs that enhance LGBT competency. METHODS: We invited all 138 Liaison Committee on Medical Education-accredited US academic faculty practices to participate in a survey in 2012. We systematically assessed their procedures and policies to identify LGBT-competent physicians and their LGBT-competency training. We also assessed geographic region, funding source, and an LGBT health center in the same state. We performed univariate, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The response rate was 50%. Few participants had existing procedures (9%) or policies (4%) to identify LGBT-competent physicians. Procedures included online directories with self-identified LGBT-competent physicians available to the public. Sixteen percent of participants reported having comprehensive LGBT-competency training, and 52% reported having no training. Of note, 80% of participants indicated interest to do more to address these issues. CONCLUSIONS: There exist both need and interest for US academic faculty practices to develop procedures, policies, and programs that improve access to LGBT-competent physicians and to train physicians to become LGBT-competent.
OBJECTIVES: We assessed the existence of procedures and policies for identifying lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT)-competent physicians at US academic faculty practices, and sought to identify physician training programs that enhance LGBT competency. METHODS: We invited all 138 Liaison Committee on Medical Education-accredited US academic faculty practices to participate in a survey in 2012. We systematically assessed their procedures and policies to identify LGBT-competent physicians and their LGBT-competency training. We also assessed geographic region, funding source, and an LGBT health center in the same state. We performed univariate, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The response rate was 50%. Few participants had existing procedures (9%) or policies (4%) to identify LGBT-competent physicians. Procedures included online directories with self-identified LGBT-competent physicians available to the public. Sixteen percent of participants reported having comprehensive LGBT-competency training, and 52% reported having no training. Of note, 80% of participants indicated interest to do more to address these issues. CONCLUSIONS: There exist both need and interest for US academic faculty practices to develop procedures, policies, and programs that improve access to LGBT-competent physicians and to train physicians to become LGBT-competent.
Authors: Kenneth H Mayer; Judith B Bradford; Harvey J Makadon; Ron Stall; Hilary Goldhammer; Stewart Landers Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Juno Obedin-Maliver; Elizabeth S Goldsmith; Leslie Stewart; William White; Eric Tran; Stephanie Brenman; Maggie Wells; David M Fetterman; Gabriel Garcia; Mitchell R Lunn Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-09-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Désirée A Lie; Elizabeth Lee-Rey; Art Gomez; Sylvia Bereknyei; Clarence H Braddock Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-10-16 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sheilla L Madera; Nelson Varas Díaz; Mark Padilla; Xida Ramos Pibernus; Torsten B Neilands; Eliut Rivera Segarra; Carmen M Velázquez; Walter Bockting Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2019