| Literature DB >> 25879759 |
Qian Zhang1, Wei Zhou1, Guoqing Liang1, Xiubin Wang1, Jingwen Sun1, Ping He1, Lujiu Li2.
Abstract
This study aimed to evEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25879759 PMCID: PMC4399876 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124096
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Extracellular enzymes assayed in the sampled soil, their enzyme commission number (EC) and corresponding substrate (L-DOPA = L-3, 4-dihydroxyphenylalanine, 4-MUB = 4-methylumbelliferyl).
| Enzyme | Substrate | EC |
|---|---|---|
| Phosphatase | 4-MUB-phosphate | 3.1.3.1 |
| β-glucosidase | 4-MUB-β-D-glucoside | 3.2.1.21 |
| β-cellobiosidase | 4-MUB-β-D-cellobioside | 3.2.1.91 |
| N-Acetyl-glucosaminidase | 4-MUB-N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminide | 3.2.1.30 |
| β-xylosidase | 4-MUB-β-D-xyloside | 3.2.1.37 |
| L-leucine aminopeptidase | L-Leucine-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin | 3.4.11.1 |
| Phenol oxidase | L-DOPA | 1.10.3.2 |
Rice yield and albic paddy soil pH, SOC and levels of N, P, K in soils under different organic manure amendments.
| Treatments | Yield | pH | SOC | Total N | NO3 --N | NH4 +-N | Available P | Available K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (kg/ha) | (g/kg) | (g/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | (mg/kg) | ||
| NPK | 6280.0±132.8c | 5.50±0.05a | 8.77±1.23b | 0.76±0.01b | 0.17±0.02a | 13.14±0.13b | 9.24±0.73b | 103.54±2.40b |
| NPK+M | 7777.5±157.6a | 5.32±0.02b | 12.19±1.08a | 0.84±0.04ab | 0.14±0.02a | 15.59±1.25ab | 14.67±1.07a | 117.08±1.56b |
| NPK+S | 6756.3±65.7b | 5.28±0.02b | 13.63±1.18a | 0.86±0.03ab | 0.15±0.02a | 15.73±1.98ab | 11.31±1.71ab | 142.28±7.02a |
| NPK+G | 6293.8±103.1c | 5.12±0.03c | 11.18±0.81ab | 0.89±0.02a | 0.17±0.05a | 19.05±0.64a | 14.36±1.19a | 104.94±1.19b |
Data are means ± standard error, n = 3. Different letters indicate significant differences among fertilizer treatments at p <0.05 (Fish’s LSD test).
Fig 1Effects of different organic manures on the activities of extracellular enzymes.
Bars indicate standard error, n = 3. Different letters indicate significantly different means at p <0.05 (Fish’s LSD test).
Amounts of total, bacterial, fungal, actinomycic, gram-positive bacterial and gram-negative bacterial PLFAs (nmol g-1) under different organic manure amendments.
| Treatments | Total PLFAs | Bacterial PLFA | Fungal PLFA | Actinomycic PLFA | Gram-positive(G+) PLFA | Gram-negative(G-) PLFA | G+/G- | Fungi/ Bacteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPK | 33.08±0.11b | 21.01±0.27b | 3.59±0.25bc | 3.45±0.08a | 12.82±0.13c | 8.19±0.14c | 1.57±0.01ab | 0.17±0.01a |
| NPK+M | 37.67±0.40a | 24.26±0.44a | 4.17±0.20ab | 3.89±0.20a | 14.59±0.32ab | 9.66±0.27a | 1.51±0.05b | 0.17±0.01a |
| NPK+S | 40.74±1.43a | 25.29±0.25a | 4.28±0.11a | 3.93±0.32a | 16.02±0.30a | 9.27±0.21ab | 1.73±0.06a | 0.17±0.01a |
| NPK+G | 37.98±1.03a | 22.45±0.85b | 3.44±0.15c | 3.83±0.18a | 13.63±0.65bc | 8.82±0.21bc | 1.54±0.04b | 0.15±0.00a |
Data are means ± standard error, n = 3. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments at p <0.05 (Fish’s LSD test).
Fig 2Principal component analysis of the PLFA patterns from soils under different organic manure applications (a) and loadings of the individual PLFAs (b) from the data of principal components 1 and 2.
Factors 1 and 2 accounted for 45.10% and 33.90%, respectively, of the variance.
Fig 3DGGE banding patterns of soil bacteria (a) and fungi (b) and cluster analyses of bacteria (c) and fungi (d) under different fertilizer treatments.
Fig 4Principal component analyses of bacterial (a) and fungal (b) DGGE banding patterns of different treatments.
Correlation coefficients (r) for simple correlation analysis between soil pH, nutrient concentration, enzyme activities and PLFA profiles under different fertilizer treatments.
| pH | SOC | TN | AP | AK | Pho | βG | NAG | βX | Urease | PhOx | Bacterial PLFA | Fungal PLFA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | |||||||||||||
| SOC | |||||||||||||
| Total N | -0.71 | ||||||||||||
| AP | -0.60 | 0.74 | |||||||||||
| AK | 0.63 | ||||||||||||
| Pho | 0.85 | ||||||||||||
| βG | |||||||||||||
| βCB | 0.63 | 0.77 | 0.61 | ||||||||||
| NAG- | 0.69 | ||||||||||||
| βX | 0.68 | 0.61 | |||||||||||
| LAP | 0.69 | 0.71 | |||||||||||
| Urease | 0.60 | ||||||||||||
| PhOx | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.72 | ||||||||||
| Bacterial PLFA | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.59 | ||||||||
| Fungal PLFA | 0.58 | 0.73 | 0.63 | ||||||||||
| Actinomycic PLFA | |||||||||||||
| G+/G- | -0.59 | 0.73 | 0.71 | ||||||||||
| F/B | -0.65 | 0.74 |
Note: Abbreviations: TN total N, AP available P, AK available K, Pho phosphatase, βG β-glucosidase, βCB β-cellobiosidase, NAG N-acetyl-glucosaminidase, βX β-xylosidase, LAP L-leucine aminopeptidase, PhOx phenol oxidase.
*Significant at p <0.05;
**significant at p <0.01.
Fig 5Redundancy analyses (RDA) of the correlations between soil physicochemical properties and PLFA parameters (a), the correlations between soil physicochemical properties and DGGE banding patterns (b) and the correlations between PLFA parameters and DGGE banding patterns (c).
The red arrows indicate the soil parameters that had strong and significant impact on enzyme activities (p <0.05), and corresponding explained proportion of variability was shown in the lower right corner.