| Literature DB >> 25879682 |
Angelo D'Ambrosio1, Eleonora Agricola1, Luisa Russo1, Francesco Gesualdo1, Elisabetta Pandolfi1, Renata Bortolus2, Carlo Castellani3, Faustina Lalatta4, Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo5, Alberto Eugenio Tozzi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes can be minimized through the adoption of healthy lifestyles before pregnancy by women of childbearing age. Initiatives for promotion of preconception health may be difficult to implement. Internet can be used to build tailored health interventions through identification of the public's information needs. To this aim, we developed a semi-automatic web-based system for monitoring Google searches, web pages and activity on social networks, regarding preconception health.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25879682 PMCID: PMC4399910 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122551
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Google search data by topic and their corresponding volumes.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 549 (30.4%) | 444640 (22.3%) | 13120 (2.95%) |
|
| 180 (9.96%) | 425230 (21.3%) | 12890 (3.03%) |
|
| 183 (10.1%) | 330430 (16.6%) | 4910 (1.49%) |
|
| 231 (12.8%) | 257280 (12.9%) | 2100 (0.816%) |
|
| 225 (12.5%) | 241800 (12.1%) | 3680 (1.52%) |
|
| 107 (5.92%) | 82740 (4.15%) | 1420 (1.72%) |
|
| 76 (4.21%) | 77880 (3.9%) | 680 (0.873%) |
|
| 53 (2.93%) | 51660 (2.59%) | 690 (1.34%) |
|
| 46 (2.55%) | 29340 (1.47%) | 0 (0%) |
|
| 74 (4.1%) | 29130 (1.46%) | 0 (0%) |
|
| 32 (1.77%) | 10800 (0.541%) | 1230 (11.4%) |
|
| 26 (1.44%) | 7720 (0.387%) | 770 (9.97%) |
|
| 25 (1.38%) | 6380 (0.32%) | 0 (0%) |
|
| 1807 (100%) | 1995030 (100%) | 41490 (2.08%) |
a Percentage on total number of queries.
b Percentage on total search volume.
c Percentage on topic volume
Web pages publication.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 225 (53.6%) | 81 (36%) | 144 (64%) | 58 (40.3%) |
|
| 179 (42.6%) | 69 (38.5%) | 110 (61.5%) | 49 (44.5%) |
|
| 143 (34%) | 40 (28%) | 103 (72%) | 53 (51.5%) |
|
| 130 (31%) | 39 (30%) | 91 (70%) | 43 (47.3%) |
|
| 118 (28.1%) | 36 (30.5%) | 82 (69.5%) | 25 (30.5%) |
|
| 89 (21.2%) | 43 (48.3%) | 46 (51.7%) | 21 (45.7%) |
|
| 80 (19%) | 27 (33.8%) | 53 (66.2%) | 16 (30.2%) |
|
| 66 (15.7%) | 17 (25.8%) | 49 (74.2%) | 18 (36.7%) |
|
| 61 (14.5%) | 12 (19.7%) | 49 (80.3%) | 22 (44.9%) |
|
| 30 (7.14%) | 13 (43.3%) | 17 (56.7%) | 4 (23.5%) |
|
| 29 (6.9%) | 8 (27.6%) | 21 (72.4%) | 6 (28.6%) |
|
| 19 (4.52%) | 2 (10.5%) | 17 (89.5%) | 11 (64.7%) |
|
| 15 (3.57%) | 3 (20%) | 12 (80%) | 3 (25%) |
|
| 420 (100%) | 151 (35.9%) | 269 (64.0%) | 115 (42.8%) |
a Percentage on total number of pages.
b Percentage on topic pages.
c Percentage on topic pages.
d Percentage on topic information pages.
Sharing volumes and the sharing per page (s/p) ratio for each topic.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| 12156 (66.6%) | 84.4 s/p |
|
| 9009 (49.3%) | 81.9 s/p |
|
| 6385 (35.0%) | 62 s/p |
|
| 5668 (31.0%) | 69.1 s/p |
|
| 4524 (24.8%) | 49.7 s/p |
|
| 2609 (14.3%) | 56.7 s/p |
|
| 2603 (14.3%) | 153 s/p |
|
| 2505 (13.7%) | 47.3 s/p |
|
| 1601 (8.77%) | 32.7 s/p |
|
| 772 (4.23%) | 15.8 s/p |
|
| 319 (1.75%) | 26.6 s/p |
|
| 267 (1.46%) | 15.7 s/p |
|
| 188 (1.03%) | 8.95 s/p |
|
| 18262 (100%) | 67 s/p |
a percentage on total sharing events
Fig 1Correlation between the volumes of information pages with searches (A), and with the sharing/page ratio by topic (B).