Literature DB >> 25878848

Crystal structure of bis-[μ-meth-oxy(pyridin-2-yl)methano-lato-κ(3) N,O:O]bis[chlorido-copper(II)].

Sujirat Boonlue1, Anchalee Sirikulkajorn1, Kittipong Chainok2.   

Abstract

The racemic title compound, [Cu2(C7H8NO2)2Cl2], is composed of dinuclear mol-ecules in which meth-oxy(pyridin-2-yl)methano-late ligands bridge two symmetry-related Cu(II) ions. Each Cu(II) ion is coordinated in a square-planar geometry by one Cl atom, the N and O atoms of the bidentate ligand and the bridging O atom of the centrosymmetrically related bidentate ligand. The separation between the two Cu(II) atoms is 3.005 (1) Å. In the crystal, non-classical C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, weak π-π stacking [centroid-centroid distance = 4.073 (1) Å] and weak electrostatic CuCl inter-actions [3.023 (1) Å] link the dinuclear mol-ecules into chains running parallel to the b axis. These chains are further connected by weak C-H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds directed approximately along the a axis, forming a three-dimensional supra-molecular network.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cu⋯Cl inter­action; copper(II); crystal structure; hydrogen bonds; π–π stacking

Year:  2015        PMID: 25878848      PMCID: PMC4384564          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015001310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Related literature

For related structures and applications of transition metal compounds with the meth­oxy-2-pyridyl­methano­late ligand, see: Pijper et al. (2010 ▸); Mondal et al. (2009 ▸); Drew et al. (2008 ▸); Wang et al. (2003 ▸); Guidote et al. (2001 ▸).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Cu2(C7H8NO2)2Cl2] M = 474.29 Monoclinic, a = 10.5568 (14) Å b = 4.0728 (6) Å c = 19.257 (3) Å β = 95.280 (3)° V = 824.5 (2) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 2.92 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.16 × 0.10 × 0.06 mm

Data collection

Bruker D8 QUEST CMOS diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014 ▸) T min = 0.645, T max = 0.745 7703 measured reflections 1485 independent reflections 1030 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.091

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.045 wR(F 2) = 0.108 S = 1.04 1485 reflections 110 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.52 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.42 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2014 ▸); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2014 ▸); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▸) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006 ▸); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸), enCIFer (Allen et al., 2004 ▸) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▸). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015001310/cq2013sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015001310/cq2013Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015001310/cq2013Isup3.cdx Click here for additional data file. . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015001310/cq2013fig1.tif A view of the dinuclear mol­ecule of the title compound, showing the atom labelling. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Click here for additional data file. b . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015001310/cq2013fig2.tif Partial packing diagram of the title compound showing a mol­ecular one-dimensional chain running parallel to the b axis assembled from dinuclear mol­ecules linked together through non-classical C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, weak π-π stacking and weak electrostatic CuCl inter­actions (dashed lines). Hydrogen atoms not involved in the hydrogen bonding inter­actions are omitted for clarity. Click here for additional data file. . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015001310/cq2013fig3.tif A view of the weak C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonding network between adjacent dinuclear mol­ecules in the title compound which serve to connect the chains into a three-dimensional architecture. CCDC reference: 1044740 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Cu2(C7H8NO2)2Cl2]F(000) = 476
Mr = 474.29Dx = 1.910 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 10.5568 (14) ÅCell parameters from 546 reflections
b = 4.0728 (6) Åθ = 3.6–25.4°
c = 19.257 (3) ŵ = 2.92 mm1
β = 95.280 (3)°T = 298 K
V = 824.5 (2) Å3Plate, pale-green
Z = 20.16 × 0.10 × 0.06 mm
Bruker D8 QUEST CMOS diffractometer1485 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1030 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.091
Detector resolution: 0 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.4°, θmin = 3.6°
φ and ω scansh = −12→12
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014)k = −4→4
Tmin = 0.645, Tmax = 0.745l = −23→23
7703 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.108H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0544P)2 + 0.5475P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1485 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
110 parametersΔρmax = 0.52 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.42 e Å3
0 constraints
Experimental. SADABS-2014/4 (Bruker,2014/4) was used for absorption correction. wR2(int) was 0.0681 before and 0.0535 after correction. The Ratio of minimum to maximum transmission is 0.8650. The λ/2 correction factor is 0.00150.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against all reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.36725 (5)0.3633 (2)0.49239 (3)0.0376 (3)
Cl10.25368 (12)−0.0100 (4)0.42980 (7)0.0431 (4)
O10.4853 (3)0.5904 (12)0.55882 (18)0.0542 (13)
O20.4934 (3)0.5112 (11)0.6792 (2)0.0491 (11)
N10.2501 (3)0.4522 (11)0.5649 (2)0.0301 (11)
C10.1248 (4)0.3804 (15)0.5620 (3)0.0371 (14)
H10.08860.25580.52480.044*
C20.0492 (5)0.4839 (17)0.6114 (3)0.0486 (17)
H2−0.03680.42990.60800.058*
C30.1015 (5)0.6680 (17)0.6662 (3)0.0470 (16)
H30.05150.74280.70030.056*
C40.2300 (5)0.7412 (15)0.6700 (3)0.0399 (14)
H40.26770.86580.70670.048*
C50.3014 (4)0.6271 (14)0.6186 (2)0.0304 (12)
C60.4438 (4)0.6921 (15)0.6201 (3)0.0336 (13)
H60.46130.92670.62720.040*
C70.6176 (5)0.6071 (19)0.7070 (3)0.0587 (19)
H7A0.67920.52370.67790.088*
H7B0.63440.52000.75320.088*
H7C0.62270.84240.70860.088*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.0240 (3)0.0552 (5)0.0340 (4)−0.0123 (3)0.0041 (2)−0.0096 (4)
Cl10.0392 (7)0.0395 (9)0.0504 (9)−0.0114 (7)0.0034 (6)−0.0065 (7)
O10.0265 (18)0.099 (4)0.038 (2)−0.020 (2)0.0092 (16)−0.025 (2)
O20.037 (2)0.051 (3)0.057 (3)−0.0029 (19)−0.0100 (18)0.010 (2)
N10.026 (2)0.032 (3)0.032 (2)−0.0024 (19)0.0013 (18)0.006 (2)
C10.025 (2)0.044 (4)0.041 (3)−0.002 (3)0.000 (2)0.007 (3)
C20.024 (3)0.060 (4)0.063 (4)−0.003 (3)0.013 (3)0.014 (4)
C30.042 (3)0.050 (4)0.052 (4)0.013 (3)0.020 (3)0.008 (4)
C40.045 (3)0.033 (4)0.043 (3)0.003 (3)0.010 (3)−0.001 (3)
C50.030 (2)0.028 (3)0.033 (3)0.000 (2)0.001 (2)0.011 (3)
C60.028 (2)0.038 (4)0.034 (3)−0.002 (2)0.000 (2)0.002 (3)
C70.042 (3)0.073 (5)0.058 (4)−0.011 (3)−0.009 (3)0.013 (4)
Cu1—Cu1i3.0051 (12)C1—C21.365 (7)
Cu1—Cl12.2215 (15)C2—H20.9300
Cu1—O1i1.927 (3)C2—C31.368 (8)
Cu1—O11.937 (4)C3—H30.9300
Cu1—N11.982 (4)C3—C41.385 (7)
O1—Cu1i1.927 (3)C4—H40.9300
O1—C61.361 (6)C4—C51.378 (7)
O2—C61.415 (6)C5—C61.524 (6)
O2—C71.424 (6)C6—H60.9800
N1—C11.351 (6)C7—H7A0.9600
N1—C51.330 (6)C7—H7B0.9600
C1—H10.9300C7—H7C0.9600
Cl1—Cu1—Cu1i139.33 (5)C3—C2—H2120.4
O1—Cu1—Cu1i38.82 (10)C2—C3—H3120.6
O1i—Cu1—Cu1i39.07 (11)C2—C3—C4118.8 (5)
O1i—Cu1—Cl1102.14 (12)C4—C3—H3120.6
O1—Cu1—Cl1165.33 (16)C3—C4—H4120.4
O1i—Cu1—O177.89 (16)C5—C4—C3119.2 (5)
O1—Cu1—N181.54 (15)C5—C4—H4120.4
O1i—Cu1—N1158.20 (18)N1—C5—C4121.9 (5)
N1—Cu1—Cu1i120.03 (12)N1—C5—C6116.0 (4)
N1—Cu1—Cl199.59 (13)C4—C5—C6122.1 (5)
Cu1i—O1—Cu1102.11 (16)O1—C6—O2114.5 (5)
C6—O1—Cu1118.6 (3)O1—C6—C5109.0 (4)
C6—O1—Cu1i138.9 (3)O1—C6—H6110.2
C6—O2—C7114.8 (4)O2—C6—C5102.5 (4)
C1—N1—Cu1127.1 (4)O2—C6—H6110.2
C5—N1—Cu1114.2 (3)C5—C6—H6110.2
C5—N1—C1118.4 (4)O2—C7—H7A109.5
N1—C1—H1118.7O2—C7—H7B109.5
N1—C1—C2122.5 (5)O2—C7—H7C109.5
C2—C1—H1118.7H7A—C7—H7B109.5
C1—C2—H2120.4H7A—C7—H7C109.5
C1—C2—C3119.1 (5)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
Cu1—O1—C6—O2108.4 (4)C1—N1—C5—C6178.4 (5)
Cu1i—O1—C6—O2−79.8 (7)C1—C2—C3—C4−0.6 (9)
Cu1—O1—C6—C5−5.7 (6)C2—C3—C4—C50.0 (9)
Cu1i—O1—C6—C5166.1 (4)C3—C4—C5—N11.0 (8)
Cu1—N1—C1—C2−172.6 (4)C3—C4—C5—C6−178.8 (5)
Cu1—N1—C5—C4172.9 (4)C4—C5—C6—O1−171.8 (5)
Cu1—N1—C5—C6−7.4 (6)C4—C5—C6—O266.5 (7)
N1—C1—C2—C30.2 (9)C5—N1—C1—C20.8 (8)
N1—C5—C6—O18.4 (7)C7—O2—C6—O181.5 (6)
N1—C5—C6—O2−113.2 (5)C7—O2—C6—C5−160.6 (5)
C1—N1—C5—C4−1.4 (8)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C2—H2···Cl1ii0.932.903.756 (6)154
C3—H3···O2iii0.932.653.517 (7)156
C6—H6···O2iv0.982.593.548 (8)165
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, )

DHA DHHA D A DHA
C2H2Cl1i 0.932.903.756(6)154
C3H3O2ii 0.932.653.517(7)156
C6H6O2iii 0.982.593.548(8)165

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  3 in total

1.  The unexpected role of pyridine-2-carboxylic acid in manganese based oxidation catalysis with pyridin-2-yl based ligands.

Authors:  Dirk Pijper; Pattama Saisaha; Johannes W de Boer; Rob Hoen; Christian Smit; Auke Meetsma; Ronald Hage; Ruben P van Summeren; Paul L Alsters; Ben L Feringa; Wesley R Browne
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.390

2.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.