| Literature DB >> 25877970 |
David Baker1, George Pepper2, Freddie Yauner2, Gavin Giovannoni3.
Abstract
Lay-members of the public are often involved in grant and ethics review panels. Furthermore grant applications/reports all require some form of lay summary. In response to critical remarks from people with multiple sclerosis (MS) about using the term 'sufferer' as a descriptor, a series of surveys using the internet/social media were undertaken. People who had MS did not like being called the politically-correct 'client' (1%) but also preferred not to be called a 'patient' (5%) or a 'sufferer' (6%) and felt that these were largely 'poor' terms to describe someone with MS. Likewise 'person living with MS' did not find favour (11%). In contrast 'person/people with MS' received a lot of support (34%) but the majority of responders of the surveys (n=396) supported the use of the term 'MSer' (43%) to describe someone with MS. This was considered to be 'good' descriptor along with 'person with MS'. We suggest therefore that 'MSer' can be used as a new descriptor when writing about someone with MS, especially in lay summaries. Furthermore the use of 'patient' and notably 'sufferer' and 'client' should be avoided within both the lay and scientific literature.Entities:
Keywords: Grant reports; Lay reports; Multiple sclerosis; Social media; Survey; Terminology
Year: 2013 PMID: 25877970 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2013.06.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mult Scler Relat Disord ISSN: 2211-0348 Impact factor: 4.339