| Literature DB >> 25877792 |
R J Shah1,2, J M Diamond1,2, E Cantu3, J Flesch1,2, J C Lee1, D J Lederer4, V N Lama5, J Orens6, A Weinacker7, D S Wilkes8, D Roe8, S Bhorade9, K M Wille10, L B Ware11, S M Palmer12, M Crespo13, E Demissie2, J Sonnet14, A Shah15, S M Kawut2, S L Bellamy2, A R Localio2, J D Christie1,2.
Abstract
Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a major cause of early mortality after lung transplant. We aimed to define objective estimates of PGD risk based on readily available clinical variables, using a prospective study of 11 centers in the Lung Transplant Outcomes Group (LTOG). Derivation included 1255 subjects from 2002 to 2010; with separate validation in 382 subjects accrued from 2011 to 2012. We used logistic regression to identify predictors of grade 3 PGD at 48/72 h, and decision curve methods to assess impact on clinical decisions. 211/1255 subjects in the derivation and 56/382 subjects in the validation developed PGD. We developed three prediction models, where low-risk recipients had a normal BMI (18.5-25 kg/m(2) ), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/cystic fibrosis, and absent or mild pulmonary hypertension (mPAP<40 mmHg). All others were considered higher-risk. Low-risk recipients had a predicted PGD risk of 4-7%, and high-risk a predicted PGD risk of 15-18%. Adding a donor-smoking lung to a higher-risk recipient significantly increased PGD risk, although risk did not change in low-risk recipients. Validation demonstrated that probability estimates were generally accurate and that models worked best at baseline PGD incidences between 5% and 25%. We conclude that valid estimates of PGD risk can be produced using readily available clinical variables. © Copyright 2015 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.Entities:
Keywords: clinical research / practice; lung (allograft) function / dysfunction; lung failure / injury; lung transplantation / pulmonology
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25877792 PMCID: PMC4721238 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13262
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Transplant ISSN: 1600-6135 Impact factor: 8.086