| Literature DB >> 25877271 |
Paul K Drain1, Lilishia Gounder2, Anneke Grobler3, Faieza Sahid4, Ingrid V Bassett1, Mahomed-Yunus S Moosa5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine if urinary lipoarabinomannan (LAM) may serve as a biomarker to monitor antituberculosis (TB) therapy response, and whether LAM results before and after treatment are predictive of patient outcomes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25877271 PMCID: PMC4401837 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006833
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Baseline cohort characteristics by rapid urine LAM test result (N=90)
| LAM negative (N=61) | LAM positive (N=29) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | |||
| Mean age, years (SD) | 37.6 (10.2) | 35.4 (7.3) | 0.25 |
| Female (%) | 28 (45.9) | 16 (55.2) | 0.50 |
| Clinical | |||
| Mean weight, kilograms (SD) | 59.8 (10.1) | 58.6 (11.4) | 0.69 |
| Mean BMI, kilograms/meter2 (SD) | 21.9 (3.4) | 21.5 (3.8) | 0.68 |
| Karnofsky performance score | 0.0008 | ||
| 100 (%) | 43 (70.5) | 10 (34.5) | |
| 90 (%) | 13 (21.3) | 6 (20.7) | |
| ≤80 (%) | 4 (6.6) | 12 (41.4) | |
| Number of tuberculosis symptoms* | 0.17 | ||
| 4 (%) | 48 (78.7) | 27 (93.1) | |
| 3 (%) | 8 (13.1) | 2 (6.9) | |
| 2 (%) | 5 (8.2) | 0 (0) | |
| HIV testing (N=88) | |||
| HIV-infected (%) | 54 (91.5) | 28 (96.6) | 0.66 |
| Median CD4 count/mm3 among HIV+ (IQR) | 198 (102–270) | 106 (44–218) | 0.03 |
| Tuberculosis testing by sputum induction | |||
| AFB Smear Microscopy positive (%) | 8 (13.1) | 6 (20.7) | 0.39 |
| Culture positive (%) | 33 (54.1) | 24 (82.8) | 0.004 |
Data are proportion of participants (%), unless otherwise indicated.
*Includes cough, fever, night sweats, weight loss.
AFB, acid-fast bacilli; BMI, body mass index (calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in metres); LAM, lipoarabinomannan.
Rapid urine LAM test result during 6 months of anti-TB treatment
| Baseline (N=90) | 2-Month follow-up (N=73) | p Value (baseline vs 2 months) | 6-Month follow-up (N=50) | p Value (baseline vs 6 months) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rapid urine LAM positive | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | ||
| All participants | 29 (32.2) | 12 (16.4)* | 0.0009 | 5 (10.0)† | 0.004 |
| HIV+ | 28 (34.1) | 12 (17.6) | 0.002 | 5 (10.6) | 0.007 |
| HIV+ and CD4 ≥100/mm3 | 14 (25.5) | 4 (8.2) | 0.01 | 3 (8.6) | 0.11 |
| HIV+ and CD4 <100/mm3 | 14 (51.9) | 8 (42.1) | 0.25 | 2 (16.7) | 0.06 |
| Rapid urine LAM grade | Mean±SD | Mean±SD | Mean±SD | ||
| All participants | 0.7±1.3 | 0.5±1.2 | 0.005 | 0.2±0.7 | 0.006 |
| HIV+ | 0.8±1.4 | 0.5±1.3 | 0.007 | 0.2±0.8 | 0.008 |
| HIV+ and CD4 ≥100/mm3 | 0.5±1.0 | 0.2±0.8 | 0.007 | 0.1±0.3 | 0.04 |
| HIV+ and CD4 <100/mm3 | 1.3±1.8 | 1.3±1.9‡ | 0.31 | 0.5±1.4 | 0.08 |
*1 culture-negative participant with negative baseline rapid urinary LAM became positive at the 2-month follow-up visit.
†2 culture-positive participants with negative baseline rapid urinary LAM became positive at the 6-month follow-up visit.
‡1 culture-positive participant with 1+ grade at baseline rapid urinary LAM became 3+ at the 2 month follow-up visit; this participant died during the study.
LAM, lipoarabinomannan; TB, tuberculosis.
Figure 1(A) Rapid urine LAM grade during 6 months of anti-TB therapy for urine LAM-positive and LAM-negative participants at baseline. Error bars represent 95% CIs. We used natural-log transformed values of urine LAM grade to assess significant decrease for longitudinal regression models. (B) Rapid urine LAM grade during 6 months of anti-TB therapy for sputum culture-positive and culture-negative for pulmonary TB participants at baseline. Error bars represent 95% CIs. We used natural-log transformed values of urine LAM grade to assess significant decrease for longitudinal regression models (LAM, lipoarabinomannan; TB, tuberculosis).
Clinical improvement by rapid urine LAM test result
| N | Weight change in the following month (kg) (mean±SD) | p Value | TB symptoms NOT resolving in the following month (mean±SD) | p Value | Clinical improvement in the following month (%) | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline visit | |||||||
| Rapid LAM negative | 56 | 0.8±2.7 | 0.6±0.9 | 96.4 | |||
| Rapid LAM positive | 29 | −0.1±3.0 | 0.17 | 0.9±1.2 | 0.17 | 89.7 | 0.33 |
| 2-month follow-up | |||||||
| Rapid LAM negative | 60 | 0.7±2.4 | 0.6±1.0 | 90.0 | |||
| Rapid LAM positive | 12 | −0.5±3.6 | 0.16 | 0.8±1.1 | 0.41 | 83.3 | 0.61 |
| 6-month follow-up* | |||||||
| Rapid LAM negative | 45 | 1.0±1.8 | 0.2±0.5 | 100 | |||
| Rapid LAM positive | 5 | 0.4±0.9 | 0.52 | 0.4±0.9 | 0.41 | 100 | 1.00 |
*Data represent change from the 5-month to the 6-month follow-up visits.
LAM, lipoarabinomannan; TB, tuberculosis.
Urine LAM as a predictor of mortality among participants receiving anti-TB therapy
| Predictor | Number of deaths/number at risk (%) | Univariate HR (95% CI) | p Value | Multivariate HR* (95% CI) | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline visit | |||||
| Laboratory-based LAM negative | 19/70 (27.1) | 1.00 (reference) | – | 1.00 (reference) | – |
| Laboratory-based LAM positive | 6/20 (30.0) | 1.13 (0.45–2.83) | 0.79 | 1.19 (0.40–3.55) | 0.75 |
| Rapid LAM negative | 16/61 (31.0) | 1.00 (reference) | – | 1.00 (reference) | – |
| Rapid LAM positive | 9/29 (31.0) | 1.22 (0.54–2.76) | 0.63 | 1.41 (0.54–3.70) | 0.49 |
| Rapid LAM score <2 | 21/76 (27.6) | 1.00 (reference) | – | 1.00 (reference) | – |
| Rapid LAM score ≥2 | 4/14 (28.6) | 1.04 (0.36–3.04) | 0.66 | 0.99 (0.28–3.58) | 0.99 |
| 2-month visit | |||||
| Laboratory-based LAM negative | 12/64 (18.8) | 1.00 (reference) | – | 1.00 (reference) | – |
| Labratory-based LAM positive | 4/9 (44.4) | 3.05 (0.98–9.48) | 0.05 | 4.13 (0.88–19.4) | 0.07 |
| Rapid LAM negative | 12/61 (19.7) | 1.00 (reference) | – | 1.00 (reference) | – |
| Rapid LAM positive | 4/12 (33.3) | 2.00 (0.65–6.21) | 0.23 | 1.99 (0.52–7.65) | 0.32 |
| Rapid LAM grade <2 | 12/65 (18.5) | 1.00 (reference) | – | 1.00 (reference) | – |
| Rapid LAM grade ≥2 | 4/8 (50.0) | 3.63 (1.17–11.3) | 0.03 | 5.58 (1.24–25.2) | 0.03 |
| 6-month visit | |||||
| Rapid LAM negative | 4/45 (8.9) | 1.00 (reference) | – | 1.00 (reference) | – |
| Rapid LAM positive | 2/5 (40.0) | 5.56 (1.00–30.7) | 0.05 | 42.1 (1.87–952) | 0.02 |
*Models adjusted by age, gender, Karnofsky performance score and HIV status.
Rapid LAM result modelled as negative (grade <1) versus positive (grade ≥1), and grade <2 versus grade ≥2.
LAM, lipoarabinomannan; TB, tuberculosis.
Figure 2Rapid urine LAM grade <2 (solid blue line) versus ≥2+ grade (dashed red line) after 2 months of anti-TB therapy and time-to-event for all-cause mortality (LAM, lipoarabinomannan; TB, tuberculosis).