BACKGROUND: Unipolar depression is of high relevance in German inpatient treatment. An effective psychiatric psychotherapeutic hospital treatment also requires sufficient staff for carrying out psychotherapeutic treatment. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to define the staff requirements for guideline-adherent psychiatric-psychotherapeutic inpatient treatment of depression on the basis of a weekly treatment schedule for a 5-week admission period. A further aim was to compare the staff required with the resources defined by the German psychiatric staffing regulations (Psych-PV). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The weekly schedule was normatively defined on the basis of the current evidence for treatment efficacy and effectiveness. The staff required was calculated on the basis of the weekly schedule. The time for psychotherapy defined by the Psych-PV was calculated using the treatment classification provided by a large nationwide database. RESULTS: Regarding psychotherapy, 280 min per week is regarded as necessary and usually sufficient according to the current evidence. The results showed clearly higher requirements of working time of psychiatrists and psychologists than those defined by the Psych-PV. In particular, the Psych-PV allows only 72 min for psychotherapy per patient and week and only a limited amount of direct patient contact with psychiatrists. CONCLUSION: The figures provided impressively show that the Psych-PV does not allow effective guideline-adherent hospital treatment within a reasonable length of hospital stay. Despite its evidential effectiveness, psychotherapeutic treatment cannot be sufficiently provided under the current financing circumstances.
BACKGROUND:Unipolar depression is of high relevance in German inpatient treatment. An effective psychiatric psychotherapeutic hospital treatment also requires sufficient staff for carrying out psychotherapeutic treatment. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to define the staff requirements for guideline-adherent psychiatric-psychotherapeutic inpatient treatment of depression on the basis of a weekly treatment schedule for a 5-week admission period. A further aim was to compare the staff required with the resources defined by the German psychiatric staffing regulations (Psych-PV). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The weekly schedule was normatively defined on the basis of the current evidence for treatment efficacy and effectiveness. The staff required was calculated on the basis of the weekly schedule. The time for psychotherapy defined by the Psych-PV was calculated using the treatment classification provided by a large nationwide database. RESULTS: Regarding psychotherapy, 280 min per week is regarded as necessary and usually sufficient according to the current evidence. The results showed clearly higher requirements of working time of psychiatrists and psychologists than those defined by the Psych-PV. In particular, the Psych-PV allows only 72 min for psychotherapy per patient and week and only a limited amount of direct patient contact with psychiatrists. CONCLUSION: The figures provided impressively show that the Psych-PV does not allow effective guideline-adherent hospital treatment within a reasonable length of hospital stay. Despite its evidential effectiveness, psychotherapeutic treatment cannot be sufficiently provided under the current financing circumstances.
Authors: C Normann; J Wolff; A Hochlehnert; J P Klein; F Hohagen; K Lieb; J Deckert; P Falkai; M Berger; S C Herpertz Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 1.214
Authors: Steven D Hollon; Robert J DeRubeis; Jan Fawcett; Jay D Amsterdam; Richard C Shelton; John Zajecka; Paula R Young; Robert Gallop Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: F Jacobi; M Höfler; J Strehle; S Mack; A Gerschler; L Scholl; M A Busch; U Maske; U Hapke; W Gaebel; W Maier; M Wagner; J Zielasek; H-U Wittchen Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 1.214
Authors: Elisabeth Schramm; Dietrich van Calker; Petra Dykierek; Klaus Lieb; Sabine Kech; Ingo Zobel; Rainer Leonhart; Mathias Berger Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Pim Cuijpers; Marcus Huibers; David Daniel Ebert; Sander L Koole; Gerhard Andersson Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: M A Busch; U E Maske; L Ryl; R Schlack; U Hapke Journal: Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 1.513
Authors: Pim Cuijpers; Marit Sijbrandij; Sander L Koole; Gerhard Andersson; Aartjan T Beekman; Charles F Reynolds Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: C Normann; J Wolff; A Hochlehnert; J P Klein; F Hohagen; K Lieb; J Deckert; P Falkai; M Berger; S C Herpertz Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 1.214
Authors: B Bandelow; U Lueken; J Wolff; F Godemann; C Wolff-Menzler; J Deckert; A Ströhle; M Beutel; J Wiltink; K Domschke; M Berger Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 1.214
Authors: Michael Deuschle; Stefan Scheydt; Dusan Hirjak; Doris Borgwedel; Katrin Erk; Oliver Hennig; Marco Heser; Martina Pfister; Markus F Leweke; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 1.214