Literature DB >> 25876845

Larger phylogenetic distances in litter mixtures: lower microbial biomass and higher C/N ratios but equal mass loss.

Xu Pan1, Matty P Berg2, Olaf Butenschoen3, Phil J Murray4, Igor V Bartish5, Johannes H C Cornelissen6, Ming Dong7, Andreas Prinzing8.   

Abstract

Phylogenetic distances of coexisting species differ greatly within plant communities, but their consequences for decomposers and decomposition remain unknown. We hypothesized that large phylogenetic distance of leaf litter mixtures increases differences of their litter traits, which may, in turn, result in increased resource complementarity or decreased resource concentration for decomposers and hence increased or decreased chemical transformation and reduction of litter. We conducted a litter mixture experiment including 12 common temperate tree species (evolutionarily separated by up to 106 Myr), and sampled after seven months, at which average mass loss was more than 50%. We found no effect of increased phylogenetic distance on litter mass loss or on abundance and diversity of invertebrate decomposers. However, phylogenetic distance decreased microbial biomass and increased carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratios of litter mixtures. Consistently, four litter traits showed (marginally) significant phylogenetic signal and in three of these traits increasing trait difference decreased microbial biomass and increased C/N. We suggest that phylogenetic proximity of litter favours microbial decomposers and chemical transformation of litter owing to a resource concentration effect. This leads to a new hypothesis: closely related plant species occurring in the same niche should promote and profit from increased nutrient availability.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complementarity versus resource concentration hypotheses; decomposer; litter degradation; niche; phylogenetic biodiversity ecosystem functioning; phylogenetic signal of functional traits

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25876845      PMCID: PMC4426623          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  24 in total

1.  Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments.

Authors:  M Loreau; A Hector
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile.

Authors:  Simon P Blomberg; Theodore Garland; Anthony R Ives
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian oak communities.

Authors:  J Cavender-Bares; D D Ackerly; D A Baum; F A Bazzaz
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Biodiversity effects on soil processes explained by interspecific functional dissimilarity.

Authors:  D A Heemsbergen; M P Berg; M Loreau; J R van Hal; J H Faber; H A Verhoef
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Foliar pH as a new plant trait: can it explain variation in foliar chemistry and carbon cycling processes among subarctic plant species and types?

Authors:  J H C Cornelissen; H M Quested; R S P van Logtestijn; N Pérez-Harguindeguy; D Gwynn-Jones; S Díaz; T V Callaghan; M C Press; R Aerts
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology.

Authors:  Jeannine Cavender-Bares; Kenneth H Kozak; Paul V A Fine; Steven W Kembel
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Less lineages - more trait variation: phylogenetically clustered plant communities are functionally more diverse.

Authors:  Andreas Prinzing; Reineke Reiffers; Wim G Braakhekke; Stephan M Hennekens; Oliver Tackenberg; Wim A Ozinga; Joop H J Schaminée; Jan M van Groenendael
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Large-scale evolutionary patterns of host plant associations in the Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Steph B J Menken; Jacobus J Boomsma; Erik J van Nieukerken
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 9.  Conservatism and diversification of plant functional traits: Evolutionary rates versus phylogenetic signal.

Authors:  David Ackerly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Using phylogenetic, functional and trait diversity to understand patterns of plant community productivity.

Authors:  Marc W Cadotte; Jeannine Cavender-Bares; David Tilman; Todd H Oakley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Integrating trait and evolutionary differences untangles how biodiversity affects ecosystem functioning.

Authors:  Pedro H A Sena; Ana Carolina B Lins-E-Silva; Thiago Gonçalves-Souza
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Biotic and abiotic variables influencing plant litter breakdown in streams: a global study.

Authors:  Luz Boyero; Richard G Pearson; Cang Hui; Mark O Gessner; Javier Pérez; Markos A Alexandrou; Manuel A S Graça; Bradley J Cardinale; Ricardo J Albariño; Muthukumarasamy Arunachalam; Leon A Barmuta; Andrew J Boulton; Andreas Bruder; Marcos Callisto; Eric Chauvet; Russell G Death; David Dudgeon; Andrea C Encalada; Verónica Ferreira; Ricardo Figueroa; Alexander S Flecker; José F Gonçalves; Julie Helson; Tomoya Iwata; Tajang Jinggut; Jude Mathooko; Catherine Mathuriau; Charles M'Erimba; Marcelo S Moretti; Catherine M Pringle; Alonso Ramírez; Lavenia Ratnarajah; José Rincon; Catherine M Yule
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Evolutionary Position and Leaf Toughness Control Chemical Transformation of Litter, and Drought Reinforces This Control: Evidence from a Common Garden Experiment across 48 Species.

Authors:  Xu Pan; Yao-Bin Song; Can Jiang; Guo-Fang Liu; Xue-Hua Ye; Xiu-Fang Xie; Yu-Kun Hu; Wei-Wei Zhao; Lijuan Cui; Johannes H C Cornelissen; Ming Dong; Andreas Prinzing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.