Literature DB >> 25876221

In Vivo Measurement of Brain Tumor Elasticity Using Intraoperative Shear Wave Elastography.

D Chauvet1, M Imbault2, L Capelle1, C Demene2, M Mossad2, C Karachi1, A-L Boch1, J-L Gennisson2, M Tanter2.   

Abstract

Purpose: Objective Shear wave elastography (SWE) enabled living tissue assessment of stiffness. This is routinely used for breast, thyroid and liver diseases, but there is currently no data for the brain. We aim to characterize elasticity of normal brain parenchyma and brain tumors using SWE. Materials and
Methods: Patients with scheduled brain tumor removal were included in this study. In addition to standard ultrasonography, intraoperative SWE using an ultrafast ultrasonic device was used to measure the elasticity of each tumor and its surrounding normal brain. Data were collected by an investigator blinded to the diagnosis. Descriptive statistics, box plot analysis as well as intraoperator and interoperator reproducibility analysis were also performed.
Results: 63 patients were included and classified into four main types of tumor: meningiomas, low-grade gliomas, high-grade gliomas and metastasis. Young's Modulus measured by SWE has given new insight to differentiate brain tumors: 33.1 ± 5.9 kPa, 23.7 ± 4.9 kPa, 11.4 ± 3.6 kPa and 16.7 ± 2.5 kPa, respectively, for the four subgroups. Normal brain tissue has been characterized by a reproducible mean stiffness of 7.3 ± 2.1 kPa. Moreover, low-grade glioma stiffness is different from high-grade glioma stiffness (p = 0.01) and normal brain stiffness is very different from low-grade gliomas stiffness (p < 0.01).
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that there are significant differences in elasticity among the most common types of brain tumors. With intraoperative SWE, neurosurgeons may have innovative information to predict diagnosis and guide their resection. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25876221     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1399152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultraschall Med        ISSN: 0172-4614            Impact factor:   6.548


  32 in total

1.  Toward guiding principles for the design of biologically-integrated electrodes for the central nervous system.

Authors:  Cort H Thompson; Ti'Air E Riggins; Paras R Patel; Cynthia A Chestek; Wen Li; Erin Purcell
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 2.  Tissue mechanics regulate brain development, homeostasis and disease.

Authors:  J Matthew Barnes; Laralynne Przybyla; Valerie M Weaver
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Dissecting and rebuilding the glioblastoma microenvironment with engineered materials.

Authors:  Kayla J Wolf; Joseph Chen; Jason Coombes; Manish K Aghi; Sanjay Kumar
Journal:  Nat Rev Mater       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 66.308

4.  Difference-Frequency Ultrasound Imaging With Non-Linear Contrast.

Authors:  Yilei Li; Dina Polyak; Eli Johnson; Derek Yecies; Saba Shevidi; Adam de la Zerda; Melanie Hayden Gephart; Steven Chu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Nanomechanics and Histopathology as Diagnostic Tools to Characterize Freshly Removed Human Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Mateusz Cieśluk; Katarzyna Pogoda; Piotr Deptuła; Paulina Werel; Alina Kułakowska; Jan Kochanowicz; Zenon Mariak; Tomasz Łysoń; Joanna Reszeć; Robert Bucki
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-10-06

Review 6.  Utility of preoperative meningioma consistency measurement with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE): a review.

Authors:  Alexander G Chartrain; Mehmet Kurt; Amy Yao; Rui Feng; Kambiz Nael; J Mocco; Joshua B Bederson; Priti Balchandani; Raj K Shrivastava
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Soft Substrates Containing Hyaluronan Mimic the Effects of Increased Stiffness on Morphology, Motility, and Proliferation of Glioma Cells.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pogoda; Robert Bucki; Fitzroy J Byfield; Katrina Cruz; Tongkeun Lee; Cezary Marcinkiewicz; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 6.988

8.  Relationship between the overall survival in glioblastomas and the radiomic features of intraoperative ultrasound: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Santiago Cepeda; Sergio García-García; Ignacio Arrese; María Velasco-Casares; Rosario Sarabia
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2021-02-16

9.  Rapid 3D Bioprinting of Glioblastoma Model Mimicking Native Biophysical Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Min Tang; Shashi Kant Tiwari; Kriti Agrawal; Matthew Tan; Jason Dang; Trevor Tam; Jing Tian; Xueyi Wan; Jacob Schimelman; Shangting You; Qinghui Xia; Tariq M Rana; Shaochen Chen
Journal:  Small       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 13.281

Review 10.  Biomaterials and 3D Bioprinting Strategies to Model Glioblastoma and the Blood-Brain Barrier.

Authors:  Min Tang; Jeremy N Rich; Shaochen Chen
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 30.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.