Kevin Anthony Hoff1, Masooda Bashir2. 1. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 2. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign mnb@illinois.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We systematically review recent empirical research on factors that influence trust in automation to present a three-layered trust model that synthesizes existing knowledge. BACKGROUND: Much of the existing research on factors that guide human-automation interaction is centered around trust, a variable that often determines the willingness of human operators to rely on automation. Studies have utilized a variety of different automated systems in diverse experimental paradigms to identify factors that impact operators' trust. METHOD: We performed a systematic review of empirical research on trust in automation from January 2002 to June 2013. Papers were deemed eligible only if they reported the results of a human-subjects experiment in which humans interacted with an automated system in order to achieve a goal. Additionally, a relationship between trust (or a trust-related behavior) and another variable had to be measured. All together, 101 total papers, containing 127 eligible studies, were included in the review. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed three layers of variability in human-automation trust (dispositional trust, situational trust, and learned trust), which we organize into a model. We propose design recommendations for creating trustworthy automation and identify environmental conditions that can affect the strength of the relationship between trust and reliance. Future research directions are also discussed for each layer of trust. CONCLUSION: Our three-layered trust model provides a new lens for conceptualizing the variability of trust in automation. Its structure can be applied to help guide future research and develop training interventions and design procedures that encourage appropriate trust.
OBJECTIVE: We systematically review recent empirical research on factors that influence trust in automation to present a three-layered trust model that synthesizes existing knowledge. BACKGROUND: Much of the existing research on factors that guide human-automation interaction is centered around trust, a variable that often determines the willingness of human operators to rely on automation. Studies have utilized a variety of different automated systems in diverse experimental paradigms to identify factors that impact operators' trust. METHOD: We performed a systematic review of empirical research on trust in automation from January 2002 to June 2013. Papers were deemed eligible only if they reported the results of a human-subjects experiment in which humans interacted with an automated system in order to achieve a goal. Additionally, a relationship between trust (or a trust-related behavior) and another variable had to be measured. All together, 101 total papers, containing 127 eligible studies, were included in the review. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed three layers of variability in human-automation trust (dispositional trust, situational trust, and learned trust), which we organize into a model. We propose design recommendations for creating trustworthy automation and identify environmental conditions that can affect the strength of the relationship between trust and reliance. Future research directions are also discussed for each layer of trust. CONCLUSION: Our three-layered trust model provides a new lens for conceptualizing the variability of trust in automation. Its structure can be applied to help guide future research and develop training interventions and design procedures that encourage appropriate trust.
Authors: Ewart J de Visser; Samuel S Monfort; Kimberly Goodyear; Li Lu; Martin O'Hara; Mary R Lee; Raja Parasuraman; Frank Krueger Journal: Hum Factors Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 2.888
Authors: Katharine E Henry; Roy Adams; Cassandra Parent; Hossein Soleimani; Anirudh Sridharan; Lauren Johnson; David N Hager; Sara E Cosgrove; Andrew Markowski; Eili Y Klein; Edward S Chen; Mustapha O Saheed; Maureen Henley; Sheila Miranda; Katrina Houston; Robert C Linton; Anushree R Ahluwalia; Albert W Wu; Suchi Saria Journal: Nat Med Date: 2022-07-21 Impact factor: 87.241
Authors: Julien Meyer; April Khademi; Bernard Têtu; Wencui Han; Pria Nippak; David Remisch Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2022-09-12 Impact factor: 7.942