| Literature DB >> 25875166 |
Pauline Peugnet1, Morgane Robles1, Luis Mendoza2, Laurence Wimel3, Cédric Dubois3, Michèle Dahirel1, Daniel Guillaume4, Sylvaine Camous1, Valérie Berthelot5, Marie-Pierre Toquet6, Eric Richard6, Charlotte Sandersen2, Stéphane Chaffaux1, Jean-Philippe Lejeune2, Anne Tarrade1, Didier Serteyn2, Pascale Chavatte-Palmer1.
Abstract
In stud management, broodmares are commonly fed concentrates in late pregnancy. This practice, however, was shown to correlate with an increased incidence of osteochondrosis in foals, which may be related to insulin sensitivity. We hypothesized that supplementation of the mare with barley in the last trimester of pregnancy alters the pre-weaning foal growth, glucose metabolism and osteoarticular status. Here, pregnant multiparous saddlebred mares were fed forage only (group F, n=13) or both forage and cracked barley (group B, n=12) from the 7th month of pregnancy until term, as calculated to cover nutritional needs of broodmares. Diets were given in two daily meals. All mares and foals returned to pasture after parturition. Post-natal growth, glucose metabolism and osteoarticular status were investigated in pre-weaning foals. B mares maintained an optimal body condition score (>3.5), whereas that of F mares decreased and remained low (<2.5) up to 3 months of lactation, with a significantly lower bodyweight (-7%) than B mares throughout the last 2 months of pregnancy. B mares had increased plasma glucose and insulin after the first meal and after the second meal to a lesser extent, which was not observed in F mares. B mares also had increased insulin secretion during an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT). Plasma NEFA and leptin were only temporarily affected by diet in mares during pregnancy or in early lactation. Neonatal B foals had increased serum osteocalcin and slightly increased glucose increments and clearance after glucose injection, but these effects had vanished at weaning. Body measurements, plasma IGF-1, T4, T3, NEFA and leptin concentrations, insulin secretion during IVGTT, as well as glucose metabolism rate during euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamps after weaning, did not differ between groups. Radiographic examination of joints indicated increased osteochondrosis relative risk in B foals, but this was not significant. These data demonstrate that B or F maternal nutrition has very few effects on foal growth, endocrinology and glucose homeostasis until weaning, but may induce cartilage lesions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25875166 PMCID: PMC4395399 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122596
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Repartition of broodmares between groups “forage” and “barley” according to age, parity and withers’ height (median [quartile 1-quartile 3], minimum and maximum values).
| Group “forage” (n = 13) | Group “barley” (n = 12) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF n = 6, AA n = 6, SD n = 1 | SF n = 8, AA n = 3, SD n = 1 | |||||
| Median [Q1–Q3] | Min | Max | Median [quartile 1-quartile 3] | Min | Max | |
|
| 3 [2–3] | 2 | 11 | 3 [2–4] | 2 | 8 |
|
| 9.2 [8.1–10.2] | 6.1 | 21.2 | 8.6 [6.9–12.8] | 6.1 | 19.1 |
|
| 162.0 [160.0–165.0] | 157.0 | 170.0 | 162.5 [160.5–165.0] | 156.0 | 168.0 |
SF: Selle Français, AA: Anglo-Arab or Anglo-Arabian type, SD: Saddlebred.
Quality of feedstuff given to broodmares of groups “forage” and “barley” from November (median gestational day 186) to parturition.
| Chemical composition (per kg of dry matter) | Mineral composition (per kg of dry matter) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net energy (Horse feed units) | Horse digestible crude proteins (g) | Raw cellulose (g) | Calcium (g) | Phosphorus (g) | |
|
| 1.2 | 127 | 52.7 | 12.1 | 5.8 |
|
| 0.6 | 104 | 249.0 | 7.7 | 3.8 |
|
| 0.5 | 30 | 372.0 | 3.7 | 2.1 |
|
| 0.6 | 88 | 30.8 | 6.6 | 3.8 |
|
| NA | NA | NA | 375 | 62.5 |
Daily individual quantities of feeds given to pregnant mares of groups “forage” and “barley” from November (median gestational day 186) to parturition.
H1 and H2 indicate when a different hay batch was used.
| Median gestational day | Meal | Type of hay | Group “barley” | Group “forage” | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hay (kg) | Haylage (kg) | Barley mix (kg) | Hay (kg) | Haylage (kg) | Minerals and vitamins (kg) | |||
|
|
| H1 | 3 | 1.5 | 0 | 3 | 1.5 | 0 |
|
| H1 | 5 | 1.5 | 0 | 5 | 1.5 | 0 | |
|
|
| H1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1.5 | 0.027 |
|
| H1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1.5 | 0.028 | |
|
|
| H1 | 3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 3 | 1.5 | 0.027 |
|
| H1 | 4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 6 | 1.5 | 0.028 | |
|
|
| H1 | 3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 3 | 1.5 | 0.027 |
|
| H1 | 5 | 2 | 1.5 | 6.5 | 2 | 0.028 | |
|
|
| H1 | 3 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 3 | 1.5 | 0.027 |
|
| H1 | 4 | 2.5 | 2 | 6.5 | 2 | 0.028 | |
|
|
| H1 | 3 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 4 | 2 | 0.030 |
|
| H1 | 4 | 2.5 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 0.030 | |
|
|
| H1 | 1 | 3 | 1.5 | 3 | 2 | 0.030 |
|
| H1 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 0.030 | |
|
|
| H2 | 1 | 3 | 1.5 | 3 | 2 | 0.030 |
|
| H2 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 0.030 | |
|
|
| H2 | 1 | 3 | 1.5 | 3 | 3 | 0.035 |
|
| H2 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 0.035 | |
|
|
| H2 | 1 | 3 | 1.5 | 3 | 3 | 0.035 |
|
| H2 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 0.035 | |
Daily nutritional supply to weanlings (6 to 12 months of age).
| Chemical composition (per kg of dry matter) | Mineral composition (per kg of dry matter) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net energy (Horse feed units) | Horse digestible crude proteins (g) | Raw cellulose (g) | Calcium (g) | Phosphorus (g) | |
|
| 1.13 | 102 | 63.9 | 7.10 | 4.90 |
|
| 0.62 | 95 | 315.5 | 5.85 | 2.38 |
Fig 1Daily nutritional offer (median and IQR) to broodmares in late pregnancy: net energy (A), horse digestible crude proteins (B), raw cellulose (C), and calcium to phosphorus ratio (D).
HFU: horse feed units, BW: bodyweight. Values under the asterisks significantly differ between groups (Mann-Whitney test with FDR adjustment).
Fig 2Mares’ bodyweight (A) and body condition score (B) (median and IQR) throughout pregnancy and lactation.
O: ovulation, D: start of the diet, F: foaling, W: weaning. Values under the asterisks significantly differ between groups and those under letter “T” tend to differ between both groups (Mann-Whitney with FDR adjustment).
Fig 3Mares’ plasma glucose (A) and insulin (B) concentrations (median and IQR) over a 10-hour monitoring period a fortnight after start of the diet.
M: meals. Values under the asterisks significantly differ and those under letter “T” tend to differ between both groups (Mann-Whitney with FDR adjustment).
Fig 4Mares’ plasma glucose and insulin increments (median and IQR) during IVGTT before (A, B) and after (C, D) start of the diet.
The 5-min period between both dotted lines stands for the glucose injection time. Values under the asterisks significantly differ between both groups (Mann-Whitney with FDR adjustment).
Fig 5Mares’ plasma NEFA (A) and leptin (B) concentrations (median and IQR) throughout pregnancy and lactation.
O: ovulation, D: start of the diet, F: foaling, W: weaning. Values under the asterisks significantly differ and those under letter “T” tend to differ between both groups (Mann-Whitney with FDR adjustment).
Foals parameters in groups “forage” and “barley” (median [quartile 1-quartile 3]).
| Age (days) | Group “forage” (n = 13 or n = 12) | Group “barley” (n = 11) | Diet effect (F2-LD-F1 model) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 53.7 [50.0–59.7] | 54.3 [50.3–58.3] | p = 0.72 |
|
| 241.5 [224.1–266.5] | 249.6 [243.5–252.4] | ||
|
|
| 101.0 [100.0–102.5] | 100.5 [99.3–103.0] | p = 0.35 |
|
| 134.0 [130.5–136.0] | 131.0 [130.0–133.5] | ||
|
|
| 85.0 [85.0–90.0] | 85.0 [82.3–86.3] | p = 0.94 |
|
| 144.0 [139.3–146.8] | 142.5 [140.0–143.5] | ||
|
|
| 164.6 [147.4–194.2] | 189.9 [165.2–200.7] | p = 0.53 |
|
| 272.7 [223.8–382.8] | 335.6 [287.1–362.3] | ||
|
|
| 408.4 [328.6–427.1] | 370.7 [352.9–423.3] | p = 0.25 |
|
| 26.4 [21.0–29.2] | 22.4 [18.3–24.6] | ||
|
|
| 5.7 [4.2–6.5] | 5.4 [3.9–8.5] | p = 0.53 |
|
| 0.36 [0.31–0.53] | 0.36 [0.31–0.44] | ||
|
|
| 787.0 [612.0–889.0] | 679.0 [452.5–822.5] | p = 0.77 |
|
| 647.5 [417.5–924.5] | 660.0 [426.0–912.5] | ||
|
|
| 68.9 [40.8–92.0]T | 107.6 [56.2–165.2] |
|
|
| 16.2 [13.3–21.6] | 15.0 [9.9–22.5] | ||
|
|
| 18.5 [14.5–21.3] | 16.8 [15.6–18.2] | p = 0.96 |
|
| 8.3 [7.9–8.8] | 8.8 [8.6–8.8] | ||
|
|
| 2.5 [1.9–2.6] | 2.7 [2.4–3.8] | p = 0.11 |
|
| 1.1 [1.0–1.1] | 1.1 [1.1–1.2] | ||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| 1.3 [1.2–1.4] | 1.3 [1.3–1.4] | p = 0.70 |
|
|
| 114.8 [106.6–133.7] | 99.5 [77.1–120.4] |
|
|
| 411.0 [338.9–498.1] | 409.6 [382.5–448.4] | p = 0.75 | |
|
|
| 28.6 [20.0–37.4] | 23.8 [17.8–29.9] | p = 0.27 |
|
| 30.2 [17.1–46.9] | 33.7 [22.0–42.3] | p = 0.79 | |
|
|
| 0.016 [0.014–0.022] | 0.017 [0.016–0.021] | p = 0.54 |
P-values are given for the diet effect on each parameter. For repeated measures, p-values are those obtained using the F2-LD-F1 model. For non-repeated measures, p-values are those obtained using the Mann-Whitney test.
Foals’ relative risk and odds ratio of osteochondrosis in groups “forage” and “barley” at 218 days of age.
| Group “forage” (n = 12) | Group “barley” (n = 11) | Z statistic | Significancelevel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 10 | 6 | ||
|
| 2 | 5 | ||
|
| 0.3667 | 2.7273 | 1.384 | p = 0.1665 |
|
| 0.08852–1.5187 | 0.6584–11.2964 | ||
|
| 0.2400 | 4.1667 | 1.452 | p = 0.1466 |
|
| 0.0394–1.6486 | 0.6066–28.6219 |