Tiffany E Chao1,2, Morgan Mandigo3,4, Jessica Opoku-Anane5, Rebecca Maine3,6. 1. Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, GRB 425, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. tchao@mgh.harvard.edu. 2. Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. tchao@mgh.harvard.edu. 3. Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 4. University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA. 6. Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy may prove feasible to address surgical needs in limited-resource settings. However, no aggregate data exist regarding the role of laparoscopy in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study was designed to describe the issues facing laparoscopy in LMICs and to aggregate reported solutions. METHODS: A search was conducted using Medline, African Index Medicus, the Directory of Open Access Journals, and the LILACS/BIREME/SCIELO database. Included studies were in English, published after 1992, and reported safety, cost, or outcomes of laparoscopy in LMICs. Studies pertaining to arthroscopy, ENT, flexible endoscopy, hysteroscopy, cystoscopy, computer-assisted surgery, pediatrics, transplantation, and bariatrics were excluded. Qualitative synthesis was performed by extracting results that fell into three categories: advantages of, challenges to, and adaptations made to implement laparoscopy in LMICs. PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews were followed. RESULTS: A total of 1101 abstracts were reviewed, and 58 articles were included describing laparoscopy in 25 LMICs. Laparoscopy is particularly advantageous in LMICs, where there is often poor sanitation, limited diagnostic imaging, fewer hospital beds, higher rates of hemorrhage, rising rates of trauma, and single income households. Lack of trained personnel and equipment were frequently cited challenges. Adaptive strategies included mechanical insufflation with room air, syringe suction, homemade endoloops, hand-assisted techniques, extracorporeal knot tying, innovative use of cheaper instruments, and reuse of disposable instruments. Inexpensive laboratory-based trainers and telemedicine are effective for training. CONCLUSIONS: LMICs face many surgical challenges that require innovation. Laparoscopic surgery may be safe, effective, feasible, and cost-effective in LMICs, although it often remains limited in its accessibility, acceptability, and quality. This study may not capture articles written in languages other than English or in journals not indexed by the included databases. Surgeons, policymakers, and manufacturers should focus on plans for sustainability, training and retention of providers, and regulation of efforts to develop laparoscopy in LMICs.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy may prove feasible to address surgical needs in limited-resource settings. However, no aggregate data exist regarding the role of laparoscopy in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study was designed to describe the issues facing laparoscopy in LMICs and to aggregate reported solutions. METHODS: A search was conducted using Medline, African Index Medicus, the Directory of Open Access Journals, and the LILACS/BIREME/SCIELO database. Included studies were in English, published after 1992, and reported safety, cost, or outcomes of laparoscopy in LMICs. Studies pertaining to arthroscopy, ENT, flexible endoscopy, hysteroscopy, cystoscopy, computer-assisted surgery, pediatrics, transplantation, and bariatrics were excluded. Qualitative synthesis was performed by extracting results that fell into three categories: advantages of, challenges to, and adaptations made to implement laparoscopy in LMICs. PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews were followed. RESULTS: A total of 1101 abstracts were reviewed, and 58 articles were included describing laparoscopy in 25 LMICs. Laparoscopy is particularly advantageous in LMICs, where there is often poor sanitation, limited diagnostic imaging, fewer hospital beds, higher rates of hemorrhage, rising rates of trauma, and single income households. Lack of trained personnel and equipment were frequently cited challenges. Adaptive strategies included mechanical insufflation with room air, syringe suction, homemade endoloops, hand-assisted techniques, extracorporeal knot tying, innovative use of cheaper instruments, and reuse of disposable instruments. Inexpensive laboratory-based trainers and telemedicine are effective for training. CONCLUSIONS: LMICs face many surgical challenges that require innovation. Laparoscopic surgery may be safe, effective, feasible, and cost-effective in LMICs, although it often remains limited in its accessibility, acceptability, and quality. This study may not capture articles written in languages other than English or in journals not indexed by the included databases. Surgeons, policymakers, and manufacturers should focus on plans for sustainability, training and retention of providers, and regulation of efforts to develop laparoscopy in LMICs.
Entities:
Keywords:
Global Surgery; LMIC; Laparoscopy; Low-resource settings; Training/courses
Authors: Yunus Nadi Yuksek; Arif Zeki Akat; Ugur Gozalan; Gul Daglar; Yasar Pala; Mehmet Canturk; Tanju Tutuncu; Nuri Aydin Kama Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Allison Silverstein; Ainhoa Costas-Chavarri; Mussa R Gakwaya; Joseph Lule; Swagoto Mukhopadhyay; John G Meara; Mark G Shrime Journal: World J Surg Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Federico Gheza; Fadekemi O Oginni; Simone Crivellaro; Mario A Masrur; Adewale O Adisa Journal: World J Surg Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Norma E Farrow; Sarah J Commander; Christopher R Reed; Jenna L Mueller; Aryaman Gupta; Amos H P Loh; John Sekabira; Tamara N Fitzgerald Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Ravi Oodit; Bruce M Biccard; Eugenio Panieri; Adrian O Alvarez; Marianna R S Sioson; Salome Maswime; Viju Thomas; Hyla-Louise Kluyts; Carol J Peden; Hans D de Boer; Mary Brindle; Nader K Francis; Gregg Nelson; Ulf O Gustafsson; Olle Ljungqvist Journal: World J Surg Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Matthew C Hernandez; Victor Y Kong; John L Bruce; Johnathon M Aho; Grant L Laing; Martin D Zielinski; Damian L Clarke Journal: World J Surg Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Julian Vargas Flores; Arcenio Luis Vargas Ávila; Israel De Alba Cruz; Stephany De Luna Jimenez; Jesús Sánchez Pacheco; Jesus Fernando Nagore Ancona; Javier Lara Valdes; Elizabeth Bravo Roman Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Date: 2021-04-20