Literature DB >> 25875048

Translation into Greek and initial validity and reliability testing of a modified version of the SCIM III, in both English and Greek, for self-use.

Christina Michailidou1,2, Louise Marston3, Lorraine H De Souza4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To translate and culturally adapt the Spinal Cord Injury Measure version III (SCIM III) into Greek (GR-SCIM III). To conduct initial testing of psychometric properties of both measures by self-report.
METHOD: Forward-backward translation was conducted to produce the GR-SCIM III. Participants completed the English or Greek versions in 2008-2009. Both versions were examined for multidimensionality, internal consistency and concurrent/criterion validity with the EQ-5D.
RESULTS: Forty-five Greek adults with spinal cord injury (SCI) (23 males), mean age 61 (SD17) years; mean time since injury 11 (SD9) years, completed the GR-SCIM III. One hundred and seventy four English-speaking adults with SCI (111 males), mean age 47 (SD12) years; mean time since injury 12 (SD11) years, completed the SCIM III. Unidimensionality was confirmed for both versions. Internal consistency was acceptable (α = 0.78 for both). Validity was strong for the "self-care" subscale (GR-SCIM III ρ = -0.78, SCIM III ρ = -0.75) and moderate for the "mobility" subscale (GR-SCIM III ρ = -0.58, SCIM III ρ = -0.45).
CONCLUSIONS: This has been the first function scale translated and validated in Greek for people with SCI. Both the GR-SCIM III and SCIM III are reliable for use by self-report. More studies are needed to further examine their psychometric properties and compare with observation or interview. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: The Greek version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III (SCIM) is valid and reliable for self-report. Further testing is needed to assess psychometric qualities not assessed in the present study. Researchers and therapists in Greece can use a specific measure to assess functional independence in people with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). Consideration needs to be given to the participants' type of injury, which may affect the results of SCIM III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Greek version; reliability; self-report; spinal cord independence measure III; spinal cord injury; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25875048     DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1035454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  7 in total

1.  Do spinal cord-injured individuals with stronger sense of coherence use different psychological defense styles?

Authors:  J Shakeri; M Yazdanshenas Ghazwin; E Rakizadeh; A Moshari; H Sharbatdaralaei; S Latifi; S A H Tavakoli
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Development of Persian version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III assessed by interview: a psychometric study.

Authors:  Hooshang Saberi; Farzad Vosoughi; Nazi Derakhshanrad; Mirsaeed Yekaninejad; Zahid Hussain Khan; Amir Hassan Kohan; Shahriar Parvaneh; Setareh Ghahari; Fereydoon Agheli; Fardis Vosoughi
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Lack of knowledge and training are the major obstacles in application of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) in China.

Authors:  Nan Liu; Huayi Xing; Mouwang Zhou; Fin Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Despite limitations in content range, the SCIM-III is reproducible and a valid indicator of physical function in youths with spinal cord injury and dysfunction.

Authors:  M J Mulcahey; Christina Calhoun Thielen; Cristina Sadowsky; Jennifer L Silvestri; Rebecca Martin; Lauren White; Julie A Cagney; Lawrence C Vogel; Jennifer Schottler; Loren Davidson; Ingrid Parry; Heather B Taylor; Kristine Higgins; Michelle L Feltz; Rebecca Sinko; Jackie Bultman; Jenny Mazurkiewicz; John Gaughan
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Functional independence in the Finnish spinal cord injury population.

Authors:  Kirsi Majamäki; Susanna Tallqvist; Aki Vainionpää; Eerika Koskinen; Anna-Maija Kauppila; Paula Bergman; Heidi Anttila; Harri Hämäläinen; Anni Täckman; Mauri Kallinen; Jari Arokoski; Sinikka Hiekkala
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 2.473

6.  Neurorehabilitation Through Synergistic Man-Machine Interfaces Promoting Dormant Neuroplasticity in Spinal Cord Injury: Protocol for a Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ioannis Magras; Panagiotis Bamidis; Alkinoos Athanasiou; Konstantinos Mitsopoulos; Apostolos Praftsiotis; Alexander Astaras; Panagiotis Antoniou; Niki Pandria; Vasileia Petronikolou; Konstantinos Kasimis; George Lyssas; Nikos Terzopoulos; Vasilki Fiska; Panagiotis Kartsidis; Theodoros Savvidis; Athanasios Arvanitidis; Konstantinos Chasapis; Alexandros Moraitopoulos; Kostas Nizamis; Anestis Kalfas; Paris Iakovidis; Thomas Apostolou
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-09-13

7.  Sound psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Self-Report.

Authors:  Sophie Jörgensen; Emelie Butler Forslund; Ulrica Lundström; Erika Nilsson; Richard Levi; Erik Berndtsson; Anestis Divanoglou
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.