| Literature DB >> 25874861 |
Liqiong Chen1, Shijuan Wu1, Hongfang Lu1, Kun Huang1, Lijie Zhao2.
Abstract
Improving the separation efficiency of the inclined oil/water separator, a new type of gravity separation equipment, is of great importance. In order to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the internal flow field of the separation process of oil and water within this separator, a numerical simulation based on Euler multiphase flow analysis and the realizable k-ε two equation turbulence model was executed using Fluent software. The optimal value ranges of the separator's various structural parameters used in the numerical simulation were selected through orthogonal array experiments. A field experiment on the separator was conducted with optimized structural parameters in order to validate the reliability of the numerical simulation results. The research results indicated that the horizontal position of the dispenser, the hole number, and the diameter had significant effects on the oil/water separation efficiency, and that the longitudinal position of the dispenser and the position of the weir plate had insignificant effects on the oil/water separation efficiency. The optimal structural parameters obtained through the orthogonal array experiments resulted in an oil/water separation efficiency of up to 95%, which was 4.996% greater than that realized by the original structural parameters.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25874861 PMCID: PMC4395151 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124095
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The concrete forms of the symbols in the universal control equations for turbulence.
| Equation name | Common symbols | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| Continuity equation | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Momentum equation |
|
|
|
| Turbulent kinetic energy equation |
|
|
|
| Dissipation rate equation |
|
|
|
The geometrical dimensions of the model.
| Basic parameters | Dimension | Basic parameters | Dimension |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length of the separation tank (m) | 7.78 | Diameter of the liquid inlet (m) | 0.07 |
| Diameter of the separation tank (m) | 0.44 | Length of the oil outlet (m) | 0.1 |
| Volume of the separation tank (m3) | 1.18 | Diameter of the water outlet (m) | 0.05 |
| Length of the dispenser (m) | 0.7 | Length of the water outlet (m) | 0.1 |
| Diameter of the dispenser (m) | 0.07 | Height of the oil weir (m) | 0.8D |
| Hole number of the dispenser | 7 | Position of the oil weir (m) | 1.0D |
| Hole diameter of the dispenser | 0.02 | Height of the water weir (m) | 0.5D |
| Hole spacing | 3.0d | Position of the water weir (m) | 1.0D |
| Longitudinal position of the dispenser | 0.5D | Long radius of the head (m) | 0.22 |
| Horizontal (x) position of the dispenser | 75%Le | Short radius of the head (m) | 0.11 |
Note: D represents the diameter of the separator body; d represents the hole diameter of the dispenser; and Le represents the length of the major separation region of the separator, namely the distance between the weirs.
Range analysis.
| Order of significance levels | Influencing factors | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | horizontal position of the dispenser | 0.111 |
| 2 | hole number of the dispenser | 0.069 |
| 3 | hole diameter of the dispenser | 0.068 |
| 4 | oil weir height | 0.068 |
| 5 | water weir height | 0.067 |
| 6 | oil weir position | 0.063 |
| 7 | separator inclination | 0.055 |
| 8 | oil outlet position | 0.051 |
| 9 | hole spacing of the dispenser | 0.046 |
| 10 | longitudinal position of the dispenser | 0.036 |
| 11 | water weir position | 0.020 |
Optimal structural parameters obtained through computational analysis.
| Inclination | Oil weir height | Water weir height | Oil weir position | Water weir position | Dispenser | Oil outlet position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hole diameter | Hole spacing | Hole number | Horizontal position | Longitudinal position | ||||||
| 12° | 0.8D | 0.4D | 0.5D | 2.0D | 2.0cm | 3.0d | 8 | 0.80Le | 0.5D | 0.8D |
A comparison between the result of the validation experiment and the first three groups of the simulation results.
| Experiment No. | Water content at the oil outlet | Oil content at the water outlet | Oil/water separation efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range analysis | Experiment 4 | 44.31% | 0.50% | 95.0% |
| Experiment 14 | 79.15% | 0.46% | 95.4% | |
| Experiment 31 | 49.36% | 0.50% | 95.0% | |
| Computational analysis | Validation experiment | 39.67% | 0.50% | 95.0% |
Comparison of the separation efficiencies before and after optimization of structural parameters.
| Item | Water content at the oil outlet | Oil content at the water outlet | Separation efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before the optimization of structural parameters | 57.50% | 0.95% | 90.48% |
| After the optimization of structural parameters | 39.67% | 0.50% | 95.0% |