Literature DB >> 25873731

Percutaneous tricuspid valve implantation: two-center experience with midterm results.

Andreas Eicken1, Stephan Schubert2, Alfred Hager2, Jürgen Hörer2, Doff B McElhinney2, John Hess2, Peter Ewert2, Felix Berger2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severe tricuspid valve (TV) dysfunction may lead to surgical TV replacement with a biological valve prosthesis in patients with congenital heart disease. To expand the lifetime of this valve and reduce the number of surgeries, percutaneous TV implantation (PTVI) may be an effective alternative to repeated surgery. We report on our 2-center experience with PTVI. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2014, 17 percutaneous valves were implanted in 16 patients with TV bioprosthesis dysfunction (9 females) from 2 centers. Median age and weight were 31.3 years (5-77.2) and 65.2 kg (17.7-107); 14 patients had congenital heart disease (univentricular heart with a right atrial to right ventricle bioprosthesis in 3, Ebstein's anomaly of the TV in 5, and other in 6), and 2 had acquired TV dysfunction. All procedures were successful (Melody n=7, Sapien 26 mm valve n=4, Sapien XT 29 mm valve n=6). One valve showed early dysfunction. It was replaced surgically and shortly after that a repeated PTVI was performed. The median duration of follow-up was 2.1 years (3 days to 6.3 years). The percutaneous valve was performing well in 15 of 16 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: PTVI was safe and effectively improved TV function in all but 1 patient at midterm follow-up. We think that PTVI is a good alternative to repeated surgical TV replacements and that it may reduce the total number of open heart surgeries in these patients.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  percutaneous tricuspid valve implantation; tricuspid bioprosthesis dysfunction

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25873731     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  7 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous tricuspid valve implantation in failing bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Andreas Eicken; Peter Ewert
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-12

Review 2.  Surgical management of tricuspid stenosis.

Authors:  Marisa Cevasco; Prem S Shekar
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-05

3.  Tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation for failing bioprosthetic valves: an evolving standard of care.

Authors:  Sidakpal S Panaich; Mackram F Eleid
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

Review 4.  Current Treatment Strategies for Tricuspid Regurgitation.

Authors:  Mohammed Al-Hijji; Erin A Fender; Abdallah El Sabbagh; David R Holmes
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  [Interventions at the tricuspid valve: What is possible?].

Authors:  Alexander Lauten; H-R Figulla
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation as an alternative to repeat open-heart surgery for patients with pulmonary outflow obstruction: a reality in Singapore.

Authors:  Shakeel Ahmed Quereshi; Swee Chye Quek; Lik Wui Edgar Tay; Wei Luen James Yip; Ting Ting Low; Chin Ling William Yip; Kok Fai William Kong; Tiong Cheng Yeo; Huay Cheem Tan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 1.858

7.  Percutaneous valve in valve in the tricuspid position in a patient with Tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  Abhinay Challa; Ryan Markham; Darren Walters
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-08-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.