Literature DB >> 25873668

Pepper aldehyde dehydrogenase CaALDH1 interacts with Xanthomonas effector AvrBsT and promotes effector-triggered cell death and defence responses.

Nak Hyun Kim1, Byung Kook Hwang2.   

Abstract

Xanthomonas type III effector AvrBsT induces hypersensitive cell death and defence responses in pepper (Capsicum annuum) and Nicotiana benthamiana. Little is known about the host factors that interact with AvrBsT. Here, we identified pepper aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (CaALDH1) as an AvrBsT-interacting protein. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation and co-immunoprecipitation assays confirmed the interaction between CaALDH1 and AvrBsT in planta. CaALDH1:smGFP fluorescence was detected in the cytoplasm. CaALDH1 expression in pepper was rapidly and strongly induced by avirulent Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xcv) Ds1 (avrBsT) infection. Transient co-expression of CaALDH1 with avrBsT significantly enhanced avrBsT-triggered cell death in N. benthamiana leaves. Aldehyde dehydrogenase activity was higher in leaves transiently expressing CaALDH1, suggesting that CaALDH1 acts as a cell death enhancer, independently of AvrBsT. CaALDH1 silencing disrupted phenolic compound accumulation, H2O2 production, defence response gene expression, and cell death during avirulent Xcv Ds1 (avrBsT) infection. Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana overexpressing CaALDH1 exhibited enhanced defence response to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato and Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis infection. These results indicate that cytoplasmic CaALDH1 interacts with AvrBsT and promotes plant cell death and defence responses.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aldehyde dehydrogenase; Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria.; cell death; effector AvrBsT; pepper; plant defence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25873668      PMCID: PMC4449550          DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


Introduction

Microbial pathogens attack plants to acquire nutrients for growth, development, and reproduction (Dangl ). Pathogens that breach the protective waxy cuticular leaf surface encounter an immune system that specifically recognizes selected pathogens and altered-self molecules generated during pathogen invasion (Eulgem, 2005; Choi ; Dangl ). The first tier of the plant immune system contains pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) localized on the cell surface that bind to evolutionarily conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) (Jones and Dangl, 2006; Dodds and Rathjen, 2010; Monaghan and Zipfel, 2012). PRRs bind to the pathogen-derived ligand, become activated, and trigger an intracellular signalling cascade that drives transcriptional reprogramming and defence molecule biosynthesis to inhibit pathogen colonization (Monaghan and Zipfel, 2012). Plant bacterial pathogens utilize the type III secretion system to deliver effector proteins that subvert PRR-triggered defence responses (Kim ; Block and Alfano, 2011). The second tier of the plant immune system contains intracellular nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) receptors (Maekawa ). NLR proteins recognize specific pathogen effectors either via direct interaction with the effector protein (Dodds ) or via recognition of pathogen effector-mediated modifications (van der Hoorn and Kamoun, 2008). The hypersensitive response (HR)-like cell death that occurs during pathogen attack is an integral part of plant immune systems, and is one of the most dramatic displays of programmed cell death (PCD) in plants (Bozhkov and Lam, 2011). The hallmarks of HR include rapid oxidative burst, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as H2O2, and ion fluxes across the plasma membrane before cell death (Lamb and Dixon, 1997; Morel and Dangl, 1997). ROS is intimately related to plant cell death and defence signalling (Torres ; Van Breusegem and Dat, 2006). ROS directly inhibits pathogen growth, stimulates cell wall cross-linking, and triggers defence- and stress-response gene expression (Lamb and Dixon, 1997; Skopelitis ). Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xcv) strain Bv5-4a secretes type III effector protein AvrBsT, which induces hypersensitive cell death and strong defence responses in pepper (Capsicum annuum) and Nicotiana benthamiana (Orth ; Escolar ; Kim ). AvrBsT is a member of the YopJ/AvrRxv family in Xcv (Lewis ). AvrBsT possesses acetyltransferase activity and acetylates ACIP1 (for ACETYLATED INTERACTING PROTEIN1), an unknown protein from Arabidopsis (Cheong ). ACIP1 is proposed to function in the defence machinery required for anti-bacterial immunity. However, the molecular mechanisms and host factors involved in AvrBsT-triggered cell death are not completely elucidated. Aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs; EC 1.2.1.3) catalyse the conversion of aldehydes to the corresponding carboxylic acids and reduce NAD+ or NADP+. Human ALDHs are extensively characterized and categorized as cytosolic ALDH1 and mitochondrial ALDH2 that are involved primarily in ethanol metabolism (Hsu ; Hsu ). More than 550 ALDH genes have been identified in mammals, insects, bacteria, yeast, and plants (Sophos and Vasiliou, 2003). Some ALDHs oxidize specific substrates, whereas others accept a broad range of substrates (Yoshida ). Comprehensive genetic information has led to the establishment of the ALDH Gene Nomenclature Committee that defines specific characteristic criteria for ALDH proteins (Vasiliou ). Family 1 ALDHs include the original Class 1 ALDHs that are targeted to the cytosol. Family 2 ALDHs include the mitochondrial Class 2 ALDHs. Family 1 and 2 ALDHs play a major role in detoxification of ethanol-derived acetaldehyde (Wang ). Aldehydes are produced from lipid peroxidation and are toxic because of their chemical reactivity. Family 3 ALDHs detoxify aldehydes formed during lipid peroxidation (Lindahl and Petersen, 1991). ALDHs are involved in plant growth, development, and stress responses (Sunkar ; Kotchoni , 2010; Shin ). Maize (Zea mays) mitochondrial ALDH2B2 (also known as rf2a) is essential for normal anther development and male fertility (Liu ; Liu and Schnable, 2002). Rice (Oryza sativa) OsALDH7 function is crucial for seed maturation and viability (Shin ). A well-characterized stress-responsive ALDH is the osmotic stress-inducible betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase, which catalyses synthesis of the osmolyte glycine betaine using betaine aldehyde as the substrate (Chen and Murata, 2002). ALDH3I1 and ALDH7B4 overexpression in Arabidopsis significantly enhances tolerance to drought, salinity, and oxidative stress (Kotchoni ). The steady-state ALDH21A1 transcript level in Tortula ruralis is elevated in response to dehydration, NaCl, abscisic acid (ABA), and UV irradiation (Chen ). Two Arabidopsis ALDH genes are upregulated by dehydration, high salinity, and cold (Seki ). Two barley ALDHs are upregulated by drought stress (Ozturk ). ALDH protein accumulates to high levels in the rice lesion mimic mutant cdr2, suggesting a role for ALDH in plant programmed cell death (PCD) and defence signalling (Tsunezuka ). In this study, we isolated and identified pepper aldehyde dehydrogenase CaALDH1 as an AvrBsT-interacting protein using yeast two-hybrid screening. CaALDH1:smGFP (soluble-modified green fluorescent protein) fluorescence was detected in the cytoplasm. Heterologous transient co-expression of CaALDH1 and avrBsT in N. benthamiana leaves significantly enhanced avrBsT-triggered cell death. Cell death promotion by CaALDH1 expression depended on CaALDH1 aldehyde dehydrogenase activity. CaALDH1 expression in pepper was rapidly and strongly induced by avirulent Xcv Ds1 (avrBsT) infection. CaALDH1 silencing in pepper disrupted Xcv-induced aldehyde dehydrogenase activity, H2O2 accumulation, and cell death response, and reduced resistance to avirulent Xcv infection. Defence response gene expression also was reduced by CaALDH1 silencing. CaALDH1 overexpression (OX) in transgenic Arabidopsis plants reduced susceptibility to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato and Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis Noco2 infection. These results demonstrate the functional importance of pepper aldehyde dehydrogenase CaALDH1 for regulation of AvrBsT-triggered cell death and defence responses in plants.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

Pepper (Capsicum annuum L. cv. Nockwang) and Nicotiana benthamiana were planted in plastic pots containing a soil mix (loam:perlite:vermiculite, 3:1:1, v/v/v) at 28°C with a long-day photoperiod (16h light/8h dark) with a light intensity of 100 μmol photons m-2 s-1. Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Col-0 were grown in pots containing vermiculite, peat moss, and perlite (1:1:0.5, v/v/v) at 24°C, 60% relative humidity and 130 μmol photons m-2 s-1 with a 16h light photoperiod in a growth chamber.

Yeast two-hybrid assay

The avrBsT open reading frame (ORF) was cloned into BamHI/HindIII sites of the pGBKT7 vector. The yeast prey library was generated from a pepper cDNA library by ligating cDNA inserts into the pGADT7 vector. The constructs were co-transformed into yeast strain AH109 and plated onto synthetic dropout (SD) –histidine, ↕leucine, ↕tryptophan (↕HLT) media (Ito ). Approximately 50 000 colonies from the SD-HLT media were transferred onto selection media (SD)↕adenine, ↕histidine, ↕leucine, ↕tryptophan (↕AHLT). Plasmids were extracted from the surviving yeast colonies and used to transform E. coli. Colonies carrying pGADT7 were selected on Luria-Bertani (LB) media containing 100mg l-1 ampicillin. Isolated plasmids were sequenced, and sequence homology was analysed using Genbank BLAST tools (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).

Bimolecular fluorescence complementation assay

Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) analyses were conducted as described previously (Waadt ). To generate the BiFC constructs, the CaALDH1 coding region without termination codons was PCR-amplified and subcloned into the binary vectors pSPYNE (XbaI/XhoI) and pSCYCE (XbaI/XhoI) under control of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (see Supplementary Table S1 for the oligonucleotide sequences). pSPYNE:avrBsT and pSPYCE:avrBsT were generated as described previously (Kim ). AvrBsT and CaALDH1 fusion constructs were co-expressed in N. benthamiana leaves by infiltrating A. tumefaciens strain GV3101 carrying each construct (OD600=0.5). BiFC signals from the AvrBsT and CaALDH1 interaction were visualized 40h after infiltration using a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 5 Exciter, Carl-Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) operated with LSM Imager. pSPYCE:bZIP63 and pSPYNE:bZIP63 were used as positive controls.

Immunoblot analysis

Total soluble proteins were extracted from N. benthamiana leaves with 1ml denaturing buffer [50mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 4M urea, 10mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.8), 250mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P40, 1mM EDTA, and 0.5% SDS] per 0.5g leaf tissue. Insoluble debris was pelleted by centrifuging leaf extracts at 13 000 ×g for 20min at 4°C. For co-immunoprecipitation analyses, proteins were extracted in soluble buffer [50mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 50mM NaCl, 10mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100 and 2× protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Mannheim, Germany)]. Proteins in the supernatant were incubated with HA-agarose or cMyc-agarose (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) 4°C overnight. Proteins were resolved on 8% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to PVDF membrane (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom). Proteins tagged with HA or cMyc epitopes were detected with anti-HA-peroxidase or anti-cMyc-peroxidase antibodies (Sigma), respectively.

Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression

For subcellular localization analyses, A. tumefaciens strain GV3101 carrying pBIN35S:GFP or pBIN35S:CaALDH1:GFP was infiltrated into six-week-old N. benthamiana leaves. To confirm mitochondrial localization, leaf cells were counterstained with MitoTracker (Invitrogen). The lower epidermal cells were analysed 36↕48h after infiltration using a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 5 Exciter, Carl-Zeiss) operated with LSM Imager. For Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression, the A. tumefaciens strain GV3101 carrying pBIN35S:avrBsT, pBIN35S:CaALDH1, pBIN35S:CaALDH1-E267A, or pBIN35S:CaALDH1-C301A were infiltrated into six-week-old N. benthamiana leaves (Kim and Hwang, 2015).

Virus-induced gene silencing

Tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-based virus-induced gene silencing (Liu ) was used to investigate CaALDH1 loss-of-function in pepper plants. The non-conserved, C-terminal untranslated region of CaALDH1 cDNA was PCR-amplified and cloned into the pCR2.1-TOPO vector. The gene-specific primers are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The cloned fragment was digested with EcoRI and inserted into pTRV2. The pTRV1, pTRV2:00, and pTRV2:CaALDH1 constructs were transformed into Agrobacterium strain GV3101. An equal volume of pTRV1 Agrobacterium culture was mixed with one of the pTRV2 cultures before infiltration (OD600=0.2). The mixed cultures were infiltrated into cotyledons of pepper seedlings (Choi and Hwang, 2011). Four to five weeks after VIGS, CaALDH1-silenced plant leaves were used for quantitative RT-PCR and disease assays. The two other pepper ALDH genes (accession numbers Capana09g000318 and Capana09g000319) that share high sequence identities of 95.19 and 86.14% with CaALDH1, respectively, were identified from a BLASTn search of ALDHs from the pepper genome sequence (http://peppersequence.genomics.cn) to use for the specific silencing test of CaALDH1.

Arabidopsis transformation

Transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing CaALDH1 were generated by the floral-dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998). The CaALDH1 coding region was inserted between the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter and the nos terminator region in the pBIN35S binary vector. This construct was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 and used to transform Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia 0 (Col-0). Transformed seed stock was selected for kanamycin resistance by planting seeds on Murashige and Skoog (Duchefa, Haarlem, The Netherlands) agar plates containing 50mg l-1 kanamycin (Duchefa).

Pathogen inoculation

Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xcv) virulent Ds1 (EV, empty vector) and avirulent Ds1 (avrBsT) strains, and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000 and DC3000 (avrRpm1) strains, were grown in YN (5g of yeast extract and 8g of nutrient broth l-1) or King’s B broth (10g of peptone, 1.5g of K2HPO4, 15g of glycerol, and 1mM MgSO4 l-1), respectively. The cultured bacteria were harvested and resuspended in 10mM MgCl2 solution. Bacterial growth in leaves was monitored at different time points after infiltration with Xcv (5×104 cfu ml-1) and Pst (105 cfu ml-1) using a needleless syringe. Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (Hpa) Noco2 was grown on cotyledons of Arabidopsis seedlings at 16°C, 60% relative humidity, and a 14h photoperiod. Hpa conidia (5×104 conidia ml-1) were suspended in distilled tap water containing 0.05% Tween 20, and the inoculum suspension was sprayed onto cotyledons of seven-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings. The infected plants were incubated at 17°C in an environmentally controlled chamber.

RNA gel-blot and real-time RT-PCR analyses

Total RNA was extracted from pepper plants using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RNA was resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis, transferred onto Hybond N+ membranes (GE Healthcare), and hybridized overnight with 32P-labelled CaALDH1 cDNA. For real-time RT-PCR, 2 μg of RNA was used in a reverse-transcription reaction with MMLV reverse transcriptase (Enzynomics, Daejeon, Korea). Real-time RT-PCR was performed using iQ SYBR Green Supermix and iCycler iQ (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Gene-specific primer pairs used for real-time RT-PCR analysis are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The C. annuum CaACTIN transcript level was used for normalization of gene transcript levels. Relative expression levels were determined by comparing the calculated values with that of the uninoculated control.

Aldehyde dehydrogenase activity assay

Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity was measured from crude plant extracts (Liu ). Leaf tissue was ground in liquid nitrogen and extracted with extraction buffer [0.1M HEPES buffer (pH 7.4), 1mM EDTA, 2mM DTT, and 0.1% Triton X-100]. The extract was centrifuged at 14 000 ×g for 20min, and the resulting supernatant was used as a crude enzyme extract. For each ALDH assay, 200mg of crude enzyme extract was added to a reaction mixture containing 1.5mM NAD (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.1M sodium pyrophosphate buffer (pH 8.5) and the total volume was adjusted to 1.0ml with distilled water. The mixture was pre-incubated for 30 s before adding 17mM acetaldehyde to the mixture. The reaction was excited at 360nm, and NADH fluorescence emission was recorded at 460nm after 1min using a model Victor3 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, Massachusetts, USA). ALDH activity was expressed as nanomoles of NADH produced per minute per milligram of protein.

Electrolyte leakage assay

Leaves of pepper or N. benthamiana plants were harvested at various time points after infiltration with Xcv or Agrobacterium, respectively. Leaf discs (0.5cm diameter) were excised with a cork borer and washed in 10ml of sterile double-distilled water for 30min with gentle agitation. Washed leaf discs were transferred to 20ml of sterile, double-distilled water and incubated for 2h at room temperature with gentle agitation. The ion conductivity of the leaf samples was measured using a Sension 7 conductivity meter (HACH, Loveland, CO, USA).

Histochemistry

H2O2 accumulation was visualized by placing healthy or inoculated leaves in 1mg ml-1 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Sigma-Aldrich) solution overnight (Thordal-Christensen ). Chlorophyll was cleared from the stained leaves by boiling in 95% ethanol. Cell death was monitored by trypan-blue staining of healthy or inoculated leaves (Koch and Slusarenko, 1990). Leaves were stained with lactophenol-trypan blue solution (10ml of lactic acid, 10ml of glycerol, 10g of phenol, and 10mg of trypan blue, dissolved in 10ml of distilled water), and destained in 2.5g ml-1 chloral hydrate solution. The samples were photographed using a digital camera (Olympus, Japan) mounted on a light microscope. Chlorosis, cell death, or phenolic compound accumulation in leaves was visualized using a hand-held UV lamp (UVP, CA, USA).

H2O2 measurement

H2O2 accumulation in pepper and Arabidopsis leaves was quantified using xylenol orange (Gay ; Choi and Hwang, 2011). Xylenol orange assay reagent was freshly prepared by adding 500 μl of solution [25mM FeSO4 and 25mM (NH4)SO4 in 2.5M H2SO4] to 50ml of 125 μM xylenol orange in 100mM sorbitol. Eight leaf discs (0.5cm2) were floated on 1ml of distilled water in a microtube for 1h and centrifuged for 1min at 12 000 ×g, and 100 μl of supernatant was immediately added to 1ml of xylenol orange assay reagent. The mixture was incubated for 30min at room temperature. H2O2 was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 560nm using a DU 650 spectrophotometer (Beckman, Urbana, IL, USA) and compared with a standard curve for H2O2, which was generated by measuring a serial dilution of 100 nmol to 100 μmol of H2O2.

Results

CaALDH1 interacts with AvrBsT in vitro and in planta

AvrBsT is an Xcv type III effector protein that triggers HR in pepper and N. benthamiana leaves (Kim ). A yeast two-hybrid screen was used to isolate molecular components that interact with AvrBsT (Fig. 1A). A prey library was generated by fusing the activation domain (AD) to pepper cDNAs synthesized from transcripts of pepper leaves undergoing hypersensitive response (HR), and AvrBsT was fused to the binding domain (BD) and used as bait to screen the library. One of the AvrBsT-interacting cDNAs encoded an aldehyde dehydrogenase protein (Supplementary Figs S1, S2). This clone was designated pepper aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (CaALDH1) and was subjected to further characterization. In silico CaALDH1 analyses determined that it encoded a C4-like member of aldehyde dehydrogenase family 2 (Supplementary Fig. S1). We compared the amino acid sequences of pepper CaALDH1 protein with those of other plant species. CaALDH1 shared 66–88% sequence identities with other ALDHs from N. tomentosiformis (88%, NtALDH; XP_009627665), N. sylvestris (88%, NsALDH; XP_009803645), grass (68%, LcALDH; ABO93608), Arabidopsis (67%, AtALDH; NP_566749), rice (66%, OsALDH; NP_001043453), and maize (66%, ZmALDH; AAL99608) (Supplementary Fig. S2A). However, any ALDH homologs of N. benthamiana were not searched from the NCBI’s GenBank database. Residues 267 and 301, glutamic acid and cysteine, respectively, are predicted to be essential for catalytic activity (Supplementary Figs S1, S2).
Fig. 1.

AvrBsT interacts with CaALDH1 in yeast and in planta. (A) Yeast two-hybrid assay. CaALDH1 and AvrBsT fused with GAL4 activation domain (AD) or binding domain (BD) were co-introduced into Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain AH109, and reporter gene activation was monitored on synthetic dropout (SD)-AHLT (minus adenine, histidine, leucine, and tryptophan) medium containing X-α-gal. Combinations of Lam and p53 with SV40-T were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. (B) Co-immunoprecipitation analyses of transiently expressed CaALDH1:HA and AvrBsT:cMyc in N. benthamiana leaves. Extracted proteins were immunoprecipitated with α-cMyc or α-HA beads, and immunoblotted with α-cMyc and α-HA antibodies. (C) Bimolecular fluorescence complementation images of interactions between AvrBsT and CaALDH1 in N. benthamiana leaves. YFP fluorescence was visualized 30h after agroinfiltration using a confocal laser scanning microscope. bZIP63:YFPN and bZIP63:YFPC constructs were used as positive controls. Bars=50 µm. (D) Immunoblot analyses of YFP fusion proteins transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. Protein loading was visualized by Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) staining. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

AvrBsT interacts with CaALDH1 in yeast and in planta. (A) Yeast two-hybrid assay. CaALDH1 and AvrBsT fused with GAL4 activation domain (AD) or binding domain (BD) were co-introduced into Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain AH109, and reporter gene activation was monitored on synthetic dropout (SD)-AHLT (minus adenine, histidine, leucine, and tryptophan) medium containing X-α-gal. Combinations of Lam and p53 with SV40-T were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. (B) Co-immunoprecipitation analyses of transiently expressed CaALDH1:HA and AvrBsT:cMyc in N. benthamiana leaves. Extracted proteins were immunoprecipitated with α-cMyc or α-HA beads, and immunoblotted with α-cMyc and α-HA antibodies. (C) Bimolecular fluorescence complementation images of interactions between AvrBsT and CaALDH1 in N. benthamiana leaves. YFP fluorescence was visualized 30h after agroinfiltration using a confocal laser scanning microscope. bZIP63:YFPN and bZIP63:YFPC constructs were used as positive controls. Bars=50 µm. (D) Immunoblot analyses of YFP fusion proteins transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. Protein loading was visualized by Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) staining. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.) To investigate whether CaALDH1 interacts with AvrBsT in yeast, we swapped vectors and generated a DNA-binding domain (BD) fused with CaALDH1 and an activation domain (AD) fused with AvrBsT. We transformed these constructs into yeast with positive-control and negative-control vector pairs. AD-AvrBsT and BD- CaALDH1 interacted with each other and grew on selection media, as did BD-AvrBsT and AD-CaALDH1 (Fig. 1A). To investigate whether CaALDH1 and AvrBsT interact in planta, we performed co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) analysis in N. benthamiana leaves using transiently expressed CaALDH1:HA and AvrBsT:cMyc (Fig. 1B). Extracted proteins were immunoprecipitated with α-cMyc or α-HA beads, separated by SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with α-cMyc and α-HA antibodies. Figure 1B shows that immunoblotting with α-Myc and α-HA antibodies detected AvrBsT:cMyc and CaALDH1:HA, respectively. Therefore, the co-IP analysis indicated that CaALDH1:HA physically interacted with AvrBsT:cMyc in planta. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays were used to further investigate CaALDH1 and AvrBsT interaction in planta (Fig. 1C). CaALDH1 and AvrBsT were fused to the yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) N- and C-termini (Waadt ). Agrobacterium cells harbouring the corresponding constructs were mixed and co-infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves. Confocal images of N. benthamiana epidermal cells detected YFP fluorescence in the cytoplasm but not in the nucleus (Fig. 1C), suggesting that CaALDH1 and AvrBsT interact with each other in the plant cytoplasm. As a positive control, the bZIP63:YFP transcription-factor construct exhibited fluorescence in the nucleus. Immunoblot assay results indicate that all YFP fusion proteins were transiently expressed with appropriate molecular weights in N. benthamiana leaves (Fig. 1D).

CaALDH1 expression is specifically induced in pepper leaves by avirulent Xcv infection

RNA gel blot analyses were used to investigate CaALDH1 expression profiles during pepper plant interactions with Xcv. CaALDH1 expression was strongly induced in pepper leaves during avirulent Xcv Ds1 (avrBsT) infection, compared with that of the mock or virulent Xcv Ds1 (EV) infection (Fig. 2). During incompatible interactions, CaALDH1 expression distinctly increased 5h after inoculation, and the high expression level was maintained up to 25h after inoculation with avirulent Xcv Ds1 (avrBsT), indicating that avrBsT is required for induction of CaALDH1 expression. In contrast, CaALDH1 expression was not detected at any time point during mock or compatible interactions. These results indicate that CaALDH1 expression is strongly and specifically induced during incompatible interactions with avirulent Xcv Ds1 (avrBsT).
Fig. 2.

RNA gel blot analysis of CaALDH1 expression in pepper leaves infected with virulent Ds1 (EV) or avirulent Ds1 (avrBsT) Xcv. RNA extracted from pepper plants was blotted to nylon membrane and hybridized with 32P-labelled CaALDH1 probes. rRNA is shown as a loading control. H, healthy leaves; Mock, treated with 10mM MgCl2; EV, empty vector.

RNA gel blot analysis of CaALDH1 expression in pepper leaves infected with virulent Ds1 (EV) or avirulent Ds1 (avrBsT) Xcv. RNA extracted from pepper plants was blotted to nylon membrane and hybridized with 32P-labelled CaALDH1 probes. rRNA is shown as a loading control. H, healthy leaves; Mock, treated with 10mM MgCl2; EV, empty vector.

CaALDH1 is localized to the cytoplasm

It has been proposed that human ALDHs be categorized as cytosolic ALDH1 and mitochondrial ALDH2 that are involved primarily in ethanol metabolism (Hsu ; Hsu ; Wang ; Vasiliou ). Family 1 ALDHs include the Class 1 ALDHs that are localized to the cytosol. Family 2 ALDHs are classified as the mitochondrial Class 2 ALDHs. To investigate CaALDH1 subcellular localization, a CaALDH1 fusion with soluble-modified green fluorescent protein (smGFP) (Davis and Vierstra, 1998) was transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves using agroinfiltration (Fig. 3). The control smGFP demonstrated that GFP fluorescence was ubiquitously distributed throughout the cell including the nucleus (Fig. 3). The CaALDH1:GFP fusion protein primarily localized to the cytoplasm (Fig. 3). The CaALDH1:GFP fusion proteins were also observed as small dots in the cytoplasm, but did not co-localize to the mitochondria (Supplementary Fig. S3). These results suggest that CaALDH1 belongs to the cytosolic Class1 ALDHs.
Fig. 3.

Subcellular localization of CaALDH1. Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression of CaALDH1:smGFP in N. benthamiana epidermal cells. GFP fluorescence was visualized using a confocal laser scanning microscope 48h after agroinfiltration. Bars=50 µm. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Subcellular localization of CaALDH1. Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression of CaALDH1:smGFP in N. benthamiana epidermal cells. GFP fluorescence was visualized using a confocal laser scanning microscope 48h after agroinfiltration. Bars=50 µm. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Transient CaALDH1 expression promotes avrBsT-triggered cell death, but not Bax-triggered cell death

Co-infiltration with low titers (OD600=0.05) of Agrobacterium harbouring CaALDH1 and avrBsT accelerated cell death in N. benthamiana leaves (Fig. 4). Figure 4A shows that transient CaALDH1 expression (OD600=0.2) did not induce any cell death response, and transient avrBsT expression (OD600=0.05) did not induce typical HR cell death. However, coexpression of CaALDH1 with avrBsT (OD600=0.05) induced a severe cell death response, similar to that induced by avrBsT agroinfiltration at OD600=0.2 (Fig. 4A). The Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax) that induces hypersensitive cell death in N. benathamiana (Lacomme and Santa Cruz, 1999) was used as a positive control. As in avrBsT expression (OD600=0.2), Bax expression (OD600=0.2) induced typical HR cell death (Fig. 4A). By contrast, co-expression of Bax with CaALDH1 resulting from infiltration with Agrobacterium at OD600=0.05 did not produce a cell death response. Co-expression of avrBsT or Bax with CaALDH1-E267A or CaALDH1-C301A (inactive mutations of CaALDH1) did not produce severe cell death in N. benthamiana leaves. These results indicate that CaALDH1 specifically interacts with AvrBsT to promote AvrBsT-triggered cell death.
Fig. 4.

Transient CaALDH1 expression promotes avrBsT-triggered cell death, but not Bax-triggered cell death. (A) Cell-death phenotypes and quantification in N. benthamiana leaves 2 days after infiltration with Agrobacterium carrying CaALDH1, CaALDH1-E267A, CaALDH1-C301A, avrBsT or Bax at different inoculum ratios. Cell death was quantified based on a 0−3 scale: 0, no cell death (<10%); 1, weak cell death (10–30%); 2, partial cell death (30–80%); and 3, full cell death (80–100%). Data are means ±SD from three independent experiments. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (LSD, P<0.05). (B) Electrolyte leakage from leaf discs at different time points after infiltration with Agrobacterium carrying the indicated constructs at different inoculum ratios. Data are means ±SD from three independent experiments. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (LSD, P<0.05). (C) Immunoblot analyses of transient expression of CaALDH1, CaALDH1-E267A, CaALDH1-C301A, BAX and avrBs 2 days after agroinfiltration. Protein loading was visualized by Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) staining. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Transient CaALDH1 expression promotes avrBsT-triggered cell death, but not Bax-triggered cell death. (A) Cell-death phenotypes and quantification in N. benthamiana leaves 2 days after infiltration with Agrobacterium carrying CaALDH1, CaALDH1-E267A, CaALDH1-C301A, avrBsT or Bax at different inoculum ratios. Cell death was quantified based on a 0−3 scale: 0, no cell death (<10%); 1, weak cell death (10–30%); 2, partial cell death (30–80%); and 3, full cell death (80–100%). Data are means ±SD from three independent experiments. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (LSD, P<0.05). (B) Electrolyte leakage from leaf discs at different time points after infiltration with Agrobacterium carrying the indicated constructs at different inoculum ratios. Data are means ±SD from three independent experiments. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (LSD, P<0.05). (C) Immunoblot analyses of transient expression of CaALDH1, CaALDH1-E267A, CaALDH1-C301A, BAX and avrBs 2 days after agroinfiltration. Protein loading was visualized by Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) staining. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.) The extent of cell death was quantified by measuring electrolyte leakage from N. benthamiana leaf discs transiently expressing CaALDH1 and/or avrBsT or Bax (Fig. 4B). Control leaves expressing empty vector and leaves transiently expressing CaALDH1 did not exhibit electrolyte leakage. These results were consistent with the observed cell death phenotypes. However, leaf tissues co-expressing CaALDH1 with avrBsT, but not with Bax, at the low titers (OD600=0.05) exhibited high levels of electrolyte leakage, similar to that of leaves transiently expressing high levels of avrBsT or Bax at 24 and 48h after agroinfiltration (OD600=0.2). Leaves co-expressing inactive CaALDH1 mutants with avrBsT or Bax did not show high levels of electrolyte leakage. Immunoblot analyses confirmed that CaALDH1, CaALDH1-E267A, CaALDH1-C301A, AvrBsT and Bax proteins were transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaves (Fig. 4C). Collectively, these results indicate that CaALDH1 expression promotes avrBsT-triggered hypersensitive cell death response.

CaALDH1 exhibits aldehyde dehydrogenase activity in planta

Crude extracts prepared from N. benthamiana leaves agroinfiltrated with empty vector control, CaALDH1, CaALDH1-E267A, CaALDH1-C301A, and avrBsT were assayed for aldehyde dehydrogenase activity using acetaldehyde as substrate (Fig. 5A). Transient CaALDH1 expression (OD600=0.2) caused a 3-fold increase in ALDH activity compared to that of the empty vector control 24h after agroinfiltration. Transient avrBsT expression (OD600=0.05) caused a slight elevation in ALDH activity 48h after agroinfiltration. However, avrBsT and CaALDH1 co-expression (OD600=0.05) caused a 2-fold increase in ALDH activity 24h after agroinfiltration, similar to that of avrBsT expression (OD600=0.2). Co-expression of inactive CaALDH1 mutants (E267A or C301A) with avrBsT (OD600=0.05) did not affect ALDH activity. Crude extracts prepared from N. benthamiana leaves infiltrated with empty vector control, CaALDH1, inactive CaALDH1 mutants (E267A or C301A), and Bax were assayed for ALDH activity using acetaldehyde as the substrate (Fig. 5B). Co-expression of CaALDH1 or inactive CaALDH1 mutants (E267A or C301A) with Bax (OD600=0.05) did not affect ALDH activity. These results indicate that CaALDH1 expression induces ALDH activity, which is required for avrBsT-triggered plant cell death.
Fig. 5.

Aldehyde dehydrogenase activity assay. (A) Coexpression of CaALDH1, CaALDH1-E267A, or CaALDH1-C301A with avrBsT. (B) Coexpression of CaALDH1, CaALDH1-E267A, or CaALDH1-C301A with Bax. N. benthamiana leaves were infiltrated with Agrobacterium carrying the indicated constructs at different inoculum ratios. ALDH activity in crude extracts was assayed at 0, 24 and 48h after agroinfiltration. RFU 460nm, relative fluorescence units at 460nm.

Aldehyde dehydrogenase activity assay. (A) Coexpression of CaALDH1, CaALDH1-E267A, or CaALDH1-C301A with avrBsT. (B) Coexpression of CaALDH1, CaALDH1-E267A, or CaALDH1-C301A with Bax. N. benthamiana leaves were infiltrated with Agrobacterium carrying the indicated constructs at different inoculum ratios. ALDH activity in crude extracts was assayed at 0, 24 and 48h after agroinfiltration. RFU 460nm, relative fluorescence units at 460nm.

CaALDH1 silencing reduces avrBsT-mediated resistance, ROS burst, and cell death during Xcv infection

The tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-based virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) technique was used to generate CaALDH1 loss-of-function pepper plants (Liu ). To reduce the nonspecific silencing effect, the non-conserved, C-terminal untranslated region (UTR) of CaALDH1 cDNA was cloned into the TRV2 vector to specifically silence CaALDH1. RT-PCR analysis showed that CaALDH1 was effectively silenced in pepper plants infected with Xcv (Supplementary Fig. S4). Leaves of non-silenced (TRV:00) and CaALDH1-silenced (TRV:CaALDH1) pepper were inoculated with virulent Xcv Ds1 (EV) or avirulent Ds1 (avrBsT) strains (107 and 108 cfu ml-1). Avirulent Xcv infection (108 cfu ml-1) of non-silenced (TRV:00) leaves caused HR and complete necrosis two days after inoculation; however, CaALDH1 silencing greatly reduced HR to avirulent Xcv infection (Fig. 6A). Reduced cell death in CaALDH1-silenced leaves was evident under UV illumination (Fig. 6A). Avirulent Xcv Ds1 (avrBsT) growth in CaALDH1-silenced leaves was approximately 7-fold higher than that in non-silenced (TRV:00) leaves three days after inoculation (Fig. 6B).
Fig. 6.

Enhanced susceptibility of CaALDH1-silenced pepper leaves to avirulent Ds1 (avrBsT) or virulent Ds1 (EV) Xcv infection. (A) Enhanced disease symptoms on CaALDH1-silenced pepper leaves. Yellow line, symptoms visible only under UV illumination; orange line, visible symptoms; red line, complete cell death. (B) Bacterial growth in leaves at 0, 1 and 3 days after Xcv infiltration. Xcv Ds1 (EV) and Ds1 (avrBsT) (5×105 cfu ml-1) were infiltrated into empty-vector control (TRV:00) and CaALDH1-silenced (TRV:CaALDH1) leaves. (C) DAB staining and (D) quantification of H2O2 at different time points after infiltration with Xcv Ds1 (EV) and Ds1 (avrBsT) (5×107 cfu ml-1). (E) Trypan blue staining and (F) electrolyte leakage from leaves infiltrated with Xcv Ds1 (EV) and Ds1 (avrBsT) (5×107 cfu ml-1). Trypan blue staining was performed 24h after infiltration. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (t-test; P<0.05). Data are mean values ±SD from three independent experiments with four replicates each. EV, empty vector. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Enhanced susceptibility of CaALDH1-silenced pepper leaves to avirulent Ds1 (avrBsT) or virulent Ds1 (EV) Xcv infection. (A) Enhanced disease symptoms on CaALDH1-silenced pepper leaves. Yellow line, symptoms visible only under UV illumination; orange line, visible symptoms; red line, complete cell death. (B) Bacterial growth in leaves at 0, 1 and 3 days after Xcv infiltration. Xcv Ds1 (EV) and Ds1 (avrBsT) (5×105 cfu ml-1) were infiltrated into empty-vector control (TRV:00) and CaALDH1-silenced (TRV:CaALDH1) leaves. (C) DAB staining and (D) quantification of H2O2 at different time points after infiltration with Xcv Ds1 (EV) and Ds1 (avrBsT) (5×107 cfu ml-1). (E) Trypan blue staining and (F) electrolyte leakage from leaves infiltrated with Xcv Ds1 (EV) and Ds1 (avrBsT) (5×107 cfu ml-1). Trypan blue staining was performed 24h after infiltration. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (t-test; P<0.05). Data are mean values ±SD from three independent experiments with four replicates each. EV, empty vector. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.) Early defence responses such as ROS (H2O2) accumulation and cell death response were analysed in non-silenced (TRV:00) and CaALDH1-silenced pepper leaves during Xcv infection (Fig. 6C, D). H2O2 production and cell death were visualized by DAB (Fig. 6C) and trypan-blue staining (Fig. 6E), respectively. Significantly reduced H2O2 accumulation and cell death responses were observed in CaALDH1-silenced leaves inoculated with Xcv. Xylenol orange assay and ion conductivity measurements were used to quantify H2O2 production and cell death, respectively. CaALDH1 silencing significantly reduced H2O2 production in pepper leaves during virulent Xcv Ds1 and avirulent Xcv Ds1 (avrBsT) infection (Fig. 6D). Cell death triggered by avirulent Xcv Ds1 (avrBsT) infection was significantly reduced, with a corresponding reduction in electrolyte leakage from infected pepper leaf tissue (Fig. 6F). Collectively, these results indicate that CaALDH1 is required for avrBsT-mediated resistance to Xcv infection.

CaALDH1 silencing attenuates ALDH activity and defence-responsive gene expression

ALDH activity was analysed in leaves of non-silenced (TRV:00) and silenced (TRV:CaALDH1) pepper plants during Xcv infection. Crude extracts prepared from pepper leaves 0, 6, 12, 18 and 24h after inoculation with Xcv were analysed for ALDH activity using acetaldehyde as the substrate (Fig. 7). Avirulent Xcv Ds1 (avrBsT) infection induced substantially higher ALDH activity in non-silenced (TRV:00) leaves than that of virulent Xcv Ds1 (EV) infection. CaALDH1 silencing significantly reduced induction of ALDH activity during virulent Xcv Ds1 (EV) infection. Avirulent Xcv Ds1 (avrBsT) infection induced 2↕4-fold higher ALDH activity in empty-vector control leaves than in CaALDH1-silenced leaves 6↕24h after inoculation.
Fig. 7.

Decreased aldehyde dehydrogenase activity in CaALDH1-silenced pepper leaves infiltrated with Xcv Ds1 (EV) and Ds1 (avrBsT) (5×105 cfu ml-1). ALDH activity in pepper leaf crude extracts was analysed at different time points after Xcv infiltration. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (t-test; P<0.05). Data are mean values ±SD from three independent experiments. RFU 460nm, relative fluorescence units at 460nm; EV, empty vector.

Decreased aldehyde dehydrogenase activity in CaALDH1-silenced pepper leaves infiltrated with Xcv Ds1 (EV) and Ds1 (avrBsT) (5×105 cfu ml-1). ALDH activity in pepper leaf crude extracts was analysed at different time points after Xcv infiltration. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (t-test; P<0.05). Data are mean values ±SD from three independent experiments. RFU 460nm, relative fluorescence units at 460nm; EV, empty vector. Real-time RT-PCR analyses were performed using gene-specific primer pairs for CaALDH1, CaPR1 (PR1) (Kim and Hwang, 2000), CaDEF1 (defensin) (Do ), and CaPR10 (PR10) (Choi ) during Xcv infection (Fig. 8) to determine the effects of CaALDH1 silencing on the expression of defence-related genes at early infection stages in pepper. CaALDH1 silencing in pepper leaves significantly attenuated expression of salicylic acid (SA)-dependent defence genes CaPR1 and CaPR10, but not the jasmonate-related gene CaDEF1, during avirulent Xcv infection. These results indicate that CaALDH1 is involved in SA-dependent defence signalling during compatible and incompatible interactions of Xcv with pepper.
Fig. 8.

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis of defence-related gene expression in empty-vector control (TRV:00) and CaALDH1-silenced (TRV:CaALDH1) pepper leaves infiltrated with Xcv Ds1 (EV) and Ds1 (avrBsT) (5×107 cfu ml-1). CaPR1, PR1; CaPR10, PR10; CaDEF1, defensin1. Expression levels of Capsicum annuum CaACTIN were used to normalize defence-related gene expression levels. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (t-test; P<0.05). Data are mean values ±SD from three independent experiments. EV, empty vector.

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis of defence-related gene expression in empty-vector control (TRV:00) and CaALDH1-silenced (TRV:CaALDH1) pepper leaves infiltrated with Xcv Ds1 (EV) and Ds1 (avrBsT) (5×107 cfu ml-1). CaPR1, PR1; CaPR10, PR10; CaDEF1, defensin1. Expression levels of Capsicum annuum CaACTIN were used to normalize defence-related gene expression levels. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (t-test; P<0.05). Data are mean values ±SD from three independent experiments. EV, empty vector.

Enhanced defence response of CaALDH1-overexpressing Arabidopsis to P. syringae pv. tomato and H. arabidopsidis

The effect of ectopic CaALDH1 expression on disease resistance was analysed by generating transgenic CaALDH1-overexpressing (OX) Arabidopsis plants using the floral-dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998). Three independent CaALDH1-OX transgenic lines (#5, #6, and #9) were confirmed by RT-PCR to constitutively express CaALDH1 (Supplementary Fig. S5). Four-week-old wild-type and CaALDH1-OX Arabidopsis plants were inoculated with Pst DC3000 and DC3000 (avrRpm1) (5×105 cfu ml-1) (Fig. 9A). Viable bacterial counts in leaves increased approximately 10-fold more in wild-type plants than in CaALDH1-OX plants three days after inoculation of Pst DC3000. The Pst DC3000 (avrRpm1) bacterial titers in CaALDH1-OX plants were significantly lower than those in wild-type plants. These data indicate that CaALDH1 overexpression enhances Arabidopsis defence responses and attenuates Pst DC3000 and DC3000 (avrRpm1) growth in planta.
Fig. 9.

Enhanced resistance of CaALDH1-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants to Pst DC3000 and DC3000 (avrRpm1). (A) Bacterial growth in leaves of wild-type and CaALDH1-overexpressing plants at 0, 1 and 3 days after inoculation (5×105 cfu ml-1). (B) H2O2 quantification at different time points after inoculation (5×107 cfu ml-1). (C) Electrolyte leakage measurement. Wild-type and CaALDH1-overexpressing leaves were infiltrated with Pst DC3000 and DC3000 (avrRpm1) (5×107 cfu ml-1), and electrolyte leakage was monitored at the indicated time points. Data are mean values ±SD from three independent experiments with four replicates each. Different letters indicate significant differences at different time points (Fisher’s least significant differences; P<0.05).

Enhanced resistance of CaALDH1-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants to Pst DC3000 and DC3000 (avrRpm1). (A) Bacterial growth in leaves of wild-type and CaALDH1-overexpressing plants at 0, 1 and 3 days after inoculation (5×105 cfu ml-1). (B) H2O2 quantification at different time points after inoculation (5×107 cfu ml-1). (C) Electrolyte leakage measurement. Wild-type and CaALDH1-overexpressing leaves were infiltrated with Pst DC3000 and DC3000 (avrRpm1) (5×107 cfu ml-1), and electrolyte leakage was monitored at the indicated time points. Data are mean values ±SD from three independent experiments with four replicates each. Different letters indicate significant differences at different time points (Fisher’s least significant differences; P<0.05). CaALDH1 overexpression strengthened early defence responses such as ROS burst and cell death response in Arabidopsis leaves during Pst infection. CaALDH1-OX lines exhibited higher H2O2 accumulation levels in response to Pst infection compared with that of wild-type (Fig. 9B). H2O2 bursts during 3–12h after inoculation with Pst were significantly higher in CaALDH1-OX Arabidopsis leaves compared with those in wild-type leaves. The cell death response was quantified as the level of electrolyte leakage from discs of infected leaves (Fig. 9C). CaALDH1 overexpression led to significantly higher electrolyte leakage from leaf tissues 9–12h after Pst infection compared with that in wild-type leaves (Fig. 9C). In general, infection with avirulent Pst DC3000 (avrRpm1) induced higher ROS burst and electrolyte leakage from Arabidopsis leaves compared with that of virulent Pst DC3000 infection. ALDH activity levels were analysed in leaves of wild-type and CaALDH1-OX Arabidopsis plants inoculated with Pst DC3000 (5×107 cfu ml-1) (Fig. 10). When challenged with Pst DC3000 and DC3000 (avrRpm1), CaALDH1-OX plants exhibited significantly higher ALDH activity compared with that of wild-type leaves during infection. Pst DC3000 (avrRpm1) infection induced higher ALDH activity compared with that of Pst DC3000 infection in Arabidopsis leaves.
Fig. 10.

Enhanced aldehyde dehydrogenase activity in leaves of CaALDH1-overexpressing Arabidopsis lines in response to Pst DC3000 and DC3000 (avrRpm1) (5×107 cfu ml-1) infection. ALDH activity in pepper leaf crude extracts was analysed at the indicated time points after infiltration with Pst. RFU 460nm, relative fluorescence units at 460nm.

Enhanced aldehyde dehydrogenase activity in leaves of CaALDH1-overexpressing Arabidopsis lines in response to Pst DC3000 and DC3000 (avrRpm1) (5×107 cfu ml-1) infection. ALDH activity in pepper leaf crude extracts was analysed at the indicated time points after infiltration with Pst. RFU 460nm, relative fluorescence units at 460nm. Seven-day-old wild-type and transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings were inoculated with a conidiospore suspension of Hpa isolate Noco2 (Fig. 11). CaALDH1-OX lines exhibited reduced susceptibility to Hpa infection (Fig. 11A). A significant decrease in the number of sporangiophores was observed in cotyledons of CaALDH1-OX seedlings compared with the observed sporangiophore proliferation in wild-type plants five days after inoculation (Fig. 11B).
Fig. 11.

Enhanced resistance of CaALDH1-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants to Hpa Noco2 infection. (A) Disease symptoms on cotyledons of wild-type and CaALDH1-overexpressing plants 7 days after inoculation with Hpa Noco2. (B) Number of sporangiophores per cotyledon of wild-type and CaALDH1-overexpressing plants at 5 days after inoculation. Data were quantified based on the number of sporangiophores counted per cotyledon as follows: 0, no sporulation; 1−9, light sporulation; 10−19, medium sporulation; ≥20, heavy sporulation. More than 50 cotyledons of wild-type and CaALDH1-overexpressing plant lines were counted. Average numbers of sporangiophores are given below the chart. Data represent mean values ±SD from three independent experiments. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (LSD, P<0.05). (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Enhanced resistance of CaALDH1-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants to Hpa Noco2 infection. (A) Disease symptoms on cotyledons of wild-type and CaALDH1-overexpressing plants 7 days after inoculation with Hpa Noco2. (B) Number of sporangiophores per cotyledon of wild-type and CaALDH1-overexpressing plants at 5 days after inoculation. Data were quantified based on the number of sporangiophores counted per cotyledon as follows: 0, no sporulation; 1−9, light sporulation; 10−19, medium sporulation; ≥20, heavy sporulation. More than 50 cotyledons of wild-type and CaALDH1-overexpressing plant lines were counted. Average numbers of sporangiophores are given below the chart. Data represent mean values ±SD from three independent experiments. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (LSD, P<0.05). (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)

Discussion

Pepper leaves infected with the virulent Xcv Ds1 develop susceptible lesions, which appear water-soaked and turn yellow three days after inoculation (Lee and Hwang, 1996). Xcv type III effector AvrBsT induces hypersensitive cell death and defence responses in pepper, but not in tomato (Kim ). Introduction of AvrBsT into Xcv Ds1 rendered the strain avirulent to pepper plants (Kim ). Xcv Ds1 (avrBsT) infection induced hypersensitive response (HR) in pepper leaves. AvrBsT translocates into pepper cells via the Xcv type III secretion system, and triggers a HR during infection (Escolar ). AvrBsT also triggers hypersensitive cell death in N. benthamiana (Orth ; Kim ). AvrBsT activates effector-triggered immunity (ETI) in Arabidopsis thaliana Pi-0 plants (Cunnac ). We recently identified that pepper CaSGT1 (suppressor of the G2 allele of skp1) interacted with AvrBsT (Kim ) and promoted AvrBsT-triggered hypersensitive cell death in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. Our previous findings support the possibility that AvrBsT may interact with some host receptors related to plant cell death. Here, we demonstrated that pepper aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (CaALDH1) interacted with AvrBsT in planta, and promoted AvrBsT-triggered cell death and defence responses in plants. The compelling data prompted an investigation into the role of CaALDH1 in AvrBsT-triggered cell death and defence response. NAD(P)+-dependent aldehyde dehydrogenase is involved in the detoxification of stress-generated aldehydes (Kirch ). Aldehyde dehydrogenases are generally localized to mitochondria or cytosol (Sophos and Vasiliou, 2003; Kirch ). The Arabidopsis ALDH2C4 shares 98% identity with CaALDH1, and is predicted to accumulate in the cytosol (Skibbe ). We show that CaALDH1:smGFP accumulates primarily in the cytosol. ALDHs scavenge toxic aldehydes generated from abiotic stresses. ALDH3I1 and ALDH7B4 overexpression enhances tolerance to drought, salinity, and oxidative stress in Arabidopsis (Sunkar ; Kotchoni ). Our transient co-expression analyses indicate that CaALDH1 promotes AvrBsT-triggered cell death, but not Bax-triggered cell death, in N. benthamiana. The Bax protein has been known as a general cell death trigger in N. benthamiana (Lacomme and Santa Cruz, 1999). Bax is reported to promote apoptosis through its action on mitochondria and downstream activation of caspases in mammals (Arnoult ). Yeast two-hybrid, bimolecular fluorescence complementation and co-immunoprecipitation assays revealed the physical interaction between CaALDH1 and AvrBsT in yeast and in planta. These results support the notion that CaALDH1 may be directly involved in promoting AvrBsT-triggered cell death. Heterologous CaALDH1 coexpression with avrBsT in N. benthamiana significantly enhances avrBsT-triggered cell death. Cell death induction is dependent on aldehyde dehydrogenase activity of CaALDH1. However, co-expression of inactive CaALDH1 mutants (E267A and C301A) did not promote avrBsT-triggered cell death. Collectively, these results suggest that the CaALDH1-complex formation contributes positively to the promotion of AvrBsT-triggered cell death. RNA gel-blot analysis indicates that CaALDH1 is strongly induced in pepper leaves by avirulent Xcv (avrBsT) infection. ALDHs are predicted to play an important role for defence responses by detoxifying stress-generated aldehydes (Kirch ). Loss-of-function analyses of CaALDH1 via virus-induced gene silencing shows that CaALDH1 aldehyde dehydrogenase activity is important for R gene-mediated defence responses in pepper. CaALDH1-silenced pepper plants exhibit significantly reduced ALDH activity in leaves. CaALDH1 silencing attenuated ALDH activity and ROS burst, and significantly reduced cell death and defence responses to avirulent Xcv (avrBsT) infection. CaALDH1-silenced plants also exhibit significantly reduced expression of defence-related genes such as CaPR1 (Kim and Hwang, 2000) and CaPR10 (Choi ), which have been identified in pepper as a defence-response marker and a cell-death regulator, respectively. CaALDH1 overexpression in Arabidopsis suppressed Pst DC3000 and DC3000 (avrRpm1) growth. CaALDH1-OX plants accumulate significantly higher ROS levels during Pst infection, ultimately resulting in enhanced cell death. The ROS burst mediates cell-defence responses in pepper plants (Choi ). These results support a potential functional role of CaALDH1 in plant immunity to Pst infection. This role is observed during obligate biotrophic downy mildew infection. CaALDH1 overexpression strongly suppresses Hpa Noco2 growth. These results support the proposal that CaALDH1 activity effectively enhances defence response to biotrophic oomycete infection. Together, these data suggest that CaALDH1 is required to trigger basal defence and R gene-mediated resistance to microbial pathogens in plants. We integrate these data to propose a working model for the role of the CaALDH1 and AvrBsT complex in plant cell death and defence signalling in response to microbial pathogens (Supplementary Fig. S6). Xcv Ds1 (avrBsT) secretes the type III effector AvrBsT into host plant cells to modulate immune signalling during infection. Expression of avrBsT in Xcv Ds1 rendered the strain avirulent to pepper plants (Kim ). Infection of pepper leaves with Xcv Ds1 (avrBsT) expressing avrBsT triggers hypersensitive response (HR) accompanied by strong H2O2 generation, callose deposition and defence-marker gene expressions. Rapid induction of pepper CaALDH1 is triggered by Xcv (avrBsT) challenge. CaALDH1 expression induces ALDH activity, ROS burst, cell death response as well as expression of salicylic acid (SA)-dependent defence genes in plants. CaALDH1 interacts with AvrBsT in the plant cell cytoplasm to promote AvrBsT-triggered cell death and defence responses. The CaALDH1 and AvrBsT complex promotes ALDH activity, which may promote ROS burst and induce expression of some PR genes such as CaPR1 (Kim and Hwang, 2000) and CaPR10 (Choi ). The cumulative effect of CaALDH1 activity enhances HR-like cell death and defence responses. CaALDH1 together with AvrBsT may function upstream of ROS-mediated cell-death signalling during Xcv (avrBsT) infection. Collectively, the results presented in this study suggest that CaALDH1 acts as a positive regulator that promotes AvrBsT-triggered cell death and defence responses in plants.

Supplementary material

Supplementary data are available at JXB online. Supplementary Fig. S1. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of pepper CaALDH1 cDNA. Supplementary Fig. S2. Comparison of aldehyde dehydrogenase homologues in plants. Supplementary Fig. S3. CaALDH1 does not localize to the mitochondria. Supplementary Fig. S4. RT-PCR analysis of expression of CaALDH1, Capana09g000318 and Capana09g000319 in leaves of empty-vector control (TRV:00) and CaALDH1-silenced (TRV:CaALDH1) pepper plants. Supplementary Fig. S5. RT-PCR analysis of CaALDH1 expression in leaves of four-week-old wild-type and CaALDH1-overexpressing Arabidopsis lines. Supplementary Fig. S6. Proposed model for the functional role of CaALDH1-AvrBsT complex in plant cell death and defence signalling. Supplementary Table S1. Gene-specific primers used in this study.
  54 in total

1.  The ALDH gene superfamily of Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Hans-Hubert Kirch; Dorothea Bartels; Yanling Wei; Patrick S Schnable; Andrew J Wood
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 18.313

2.  Reactive oxygen species in plant cell death.

Authors:  Frank Van Breusegem; James F Dat
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Reactive oxygen species signaling in response to pathogens.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Torres; Jonathan D G Jones; Jeffery L Dangl
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Mitochondrial release of AIF and EndoG requires caspase activation downstream of Bax/Bak-mediated permeabilization.

Authors:  Damien Arnoult; Brigitte Gaume; Mariusz Karbowski; Juanita C Sharpe; Francesco Cecconi; Richard J Youle
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Functional specialization of maize mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenases.

Authors:  Feng Liu; Patrick S Schnable
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 6.  Human aldehyde dehydrogenase gene family.

Authors:  A Yoshida; A Rzhetsky; L C Hsu; C Chang
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1998-02-01

7.  Proteomics and functional analyses of pepper abscisic acid-responsive 1 (ABR1), which is involved in cell death and defense signaling.

Authors:  Du Seok Choi; Byung Kook Hwang
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Requirement of the cytosolic interaction between PATHOGENESIS-RELATED PROTEIN10 and LEUCINE-RICH REPEAT PROTEIN1 for cell death and defense signaling in pepper.

Authors:  Du Seok Choi; In Sun Hwang; Byung Kook Hwang
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  S J Clough; A F Bent
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.417

10.  Virus-induced gene silencing in tomato.

Authors:  Yule Liu; Michael Schiff; S P Dinesh-Kumar
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.417

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Behind the lines-actions of bacterial type III effector proteins in plant cells.

Authors:  Daniela Büttner
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 2.  Functional roles of the pepper leucine-rich repeat protein and its interactions with pathogenesis-related and hypersensitive-induced proteins in plant cell death and immunity.

Authors:  Jeum Kyu Hong; In Sun Hwang; Byung Kook Hwang
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  Active Sites of Reduced Epidermal Fluorescence1 (REF1) Isoforms Contain Amino Acid Substitutions That Are Different between Monocots and Dicots.

Authors:  Tagnon D Missihoun; Simeon O Kotchoni; Dorothea Bartels; Peta Bonham-Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Convergent Evolution of Pathogen Effectors toward Reactive Oxygen Species Signaling Networks in Plants.

Authors:  Nam-Soo Jwa; Byung Kook Hwang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Genome-wide characterization of the aldehyde dehydrogenase gene superfamily in soybean and its potential role in drought stress response.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Wei Jiang; Juge Liu; Yang Li; Junyi Gai; Yan Li
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  A bacterial acetyltransferase triggers immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana independent of hypersensitive response.

Authors:  Jay Jayaraman; Sera Choi; Maxim Prokchorchik; Du Seok Choi; Amandine Spiandore; Erik H Rikkerink; Matthew D Templeton; Cécile Segonzac; Kee Hoon Sohn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Transcriptome-Guided Mining of Genes Involved in Crocin Biosynthesis.

Authors:  Aijia Ji; Jing Jia; Zhichao Xu; Ying Li; Wu Bi; Fengming Ren; Chunnian He; Jie Liu; Kaizhi Hu; Jingyuan Song
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 8.  Molecular functions of Xanthomonas type III effector AvrBsT and its plant interactors in cell death and defense signaling.

Authors:  Sang Wook Han; Byung Kook Hwang
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.116

9.  Interaction of Arabidopsis TGA3 and WRKY53 transcription factors on Cestrum yellow leaf curling virus (CmYLCV) promoter mediates salicylic acid-dependent gene expression in planta.

Authors:  Shayan Sarkar; Abhimanyu Das; Prashant Khandagale; Indu B Maiti; Sudip Chattopadhyay; Nrisingha Dey
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.116

10.  Sugarcane transcriptome analysis in response to infection caused by Acidovorax avenae subsp. avenae.

Authors:  Ailton B Santa Brigida; Cristian A Rojas; Clícia Grativol; Elvismary M de Armas; Júlio O P Entenza; Flávia Thiebaut; Marcelo de F Lima; Laurent Farrinelli; Adriana S Hemerly; Sérgio Lifschitz; Paulo C G Ferreira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.