Literature DB >> 25873366

Efficacy of Gutta-Percha and Polytetrafluoroethylene Tape to Microbiologically Seal the Screw Access Channel of Different Prosthetic Implant Abutments.

Alexei Gama de Albuquerque Cavalcanti1, Fernando Toledo Arruda Fonseca1, Camila D'Acampora Reis Zago1, Rui Barbosa Brito Junior1, Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate in vitro, the efficacy of gutta-percha (GP) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape to act as a seal against the penetration of Escherichia coli through prosthetic implant abutments (PIA) with external hexagon (EH) and morse taper (MT) connections.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 120 sets of implant analogs with their respective PIA were used. 60 sets from each system were divided into four groups (n = 15): I - GP sealing; II - PTFE tape sealing; III - no sealing (NS) and IV - negative control. Microbiological challenge was performed by placing bacterial colonies inside the titanium PIA before screwing them into their respective analogs. Each set was immersed in 5 mL of BHI and incubated for 14 days with daily checks for contamination, according to the nutrient medium turbidity.
RESULTS: The type of seal used influenced microbial penetration at all evaluation times (p < 0.05). Compared to GP, PTFE led to an increase in turbidity and its effectiveness against microbial penetration was equivalent to group NS. When the sealing efficacy of each group was compared in terms of time, Cochran's Q test revealed that in the two groups sealed with PTFE, there was a progressive increase in the number of turbid nutrient media (p < 0.0001), while in the group sealed with GP, this was only observed in the MT system (p = 0.0310).
CONCLUSIONS: Sealing the PIA channel with GP was a significantly superior approach to sealing it with PTFE tape. PTFE tape or NS led to a progressive increase in microbiological leakage over time in PIA channels, however, this only occurred with GP in the MT system.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abutment-prosthesis interface; contamination; dental implant; microleakage; prosthetic implant abutment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25873366     DOI: 10.1111/cid.12344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  3 in total

1.  Sealing agent reduces formation of single and dual-species biofilms of Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis on screw joints at the abutment/implant interface.

Authors:  Cecília Alves de Sousa; Jadison Junio Conforte; Karina Sampaio Caiaffa; Cristiane Duque; Wirley Gonçalves Assunção
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The Use of the Diode Laser against the Microbiome on Composites Closing the Screw Access Hall (Sah) in the Reconstruction of Dental Implants: Ex Vivo Studies.

Authors:  Anna Wawrzyk; Mansur Rahnama; Weronika Sofińska-Chmiel; Sławomir Wilczyński; Michał Łobacz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Evaluation of sealing efficacy and removal convenience of sealing materials for implant abutment screw access holes.

Authors:  Huangjun Zhou; Sixian Ye; Xingyu Lyu; Hao Feng; Min Liu; Cai Wen
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.747

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.