Stuart M Sprague1, James B Wetmore2, Konstantin Gurevich3, Gerald Da Roza4, John Buerkert5, Maureen Reiner6, William Goodman6, Kerry Cooper6. 1. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois; ssprague@northshore.org. 2. Division of Nephrology, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota; 3. Fresenius Medical Care, St. Petersburg, Russia; 4. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; 5. Columbia Nephrology Associates, Columbia, South Carolina; and. 6. Clinical Research, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Cinacalcet and vitamin D are often combined to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in patients on dialysis. Independent effects on fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) concentrations in patients on hemodialysis administered cinacalcet orvitamin D analogs as monotherapies during treatment of SHPT are evaluated. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A multicenter, randomized, open-label study to compare the efficacy of cinacalcet versus traditional vitamin D therapy for management of secondary hyperparathyroidism among subjects undergoing hemodialysis (PARADIGM) was a prospective, phase 4, multicenter, randomized, open-label study conducted globally. Participants (n=312) were randomized 1:1 to cinacalcet (n=155) or vitamin D analog (n=157) for 52 weeks. Levels of FGF-23 were measured at baseline and weeks 20 and 52. The absolute and percentage changes from baseline in plasma FGF-23, parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), and calcium-phosphorus product (Ca×P) were assessed. Correlations and logistic regression were used to explore relationships between changes in FGF-23 and changes in PTH, Ca, P, and Ca×P from baseline to week 52 by treatment arm. RESULTS: Median (quartiles 1, 3) decrease in FGF-23 concentrations was observed in the cinacalcet arm (-40%; -63%, 16%) compared with median increase in the vitamin D analog arm (47%; 0%, 132%) at week 52 (P<0.001). Changes in FGF-23 in both arms were unrelated to changes in PTH (cinacalcet: r=0.17, P=0.11; vitamin D analog: r=-0.04, P=0.70). Changes in FGF-23 in the vitamin D analog but not the cinacalcet arm were correlated with changes in Ca (cinacalcet: r=0.11, P=0.30; vitamin D analog: r=0.32, P<0.01) and P (cinacalcet: r=0.19, P=0.07; vitamin D analog: r=0.49, P<0.001). Changes in FGF-23 were correlated with changes in Ca×P in both arms (cinacalcet: r=0.26, P=0.01; vitamin D analog: r=0.57, P<0.001). Independent of treatment arm, participants with reductions in P or Ca×P were significantly more likely to show reductions in FGF-23. CONCLUSIONS: During treatment of SHPT, cinacalcet use was associated with a decrease in FGF-23 concentrations, whereas vitamin D analogs were associated with an increase. The divergent effects of these treatments on FGF-23 seem to be independent of modification of PTH. It is possible that effects of cinacalcet and vitamin D analogs on FGF-23 may be mediated indirectly by other effects on bone and mineral metabolism.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Cinacalcet and vitamin D are often combined to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in patients on dialysis. Independent effects on fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) concentrations in patients on hemodialysis administered cinacalcet or vitamin D analogs as monotherapies during treatment of SHPT are evaluated. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A multicenter, randomized, open-label study to compare the efficacy of cinacalcet versus traditional vitamin D therapy for management of secondary hyperparathyroidism among subjects undergoing hemodialysis (PARADIGM) was a prospective, phase 4, multicenter, randomized, open-label study conducted globally. Participants (n=312) were randomized 1:1 to cinacalcet (n=155) or vitamin D analog (n=157) for 52 weeks. Levels of FGF-23 were measured at baseline and weeks 20 and 52. The absolute and percentage changes from baseline in plasma FGF-23, parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), and calcium-phosphorus product (Ca×P) were assessed. Correlations and logistic regression were used to explore relationships between changes in FGF-23 and changes in PTH, Ca, P, and Ca×P from baseline to week 52 by treatment arm. RESULTS: Median (quartiles 1, 3) decrease in FGF-23 concentrations was observed in the cinacalcet arm (-40%; -63%, 16%) compared with median increase in the vitamin D analog arm (47%; 0%, 132%) at week 52 (P<0.001). Changes in FGF-23 in both arms were unrelated to changes in PTH (cinacalcet: r=0.17, P=0.11; vitamin D analog: r=-0.04, P=0.70). Changes in FGF-23 in the vitamin D analog but not the cinacalcet arm were correlated with changes in Ca (cinacalcet: r=0.11, P=0.30; vitamin D analog: r=0.32, P<0.01) and P (cinacalcet: r=0.19, P=0.07; vitamin D analog: r=0.49, P<0.001). Changes in FGF-23 were correlated with changes in Ca×P in both arms (cinacalcet: r=0.26, P=0.01; vitamin D analog: r=0.57, P<0.001). Independent of treatment arm, participants with reductions in P or Ca×P were significantly more likely to show reductions in FGF-23. CONCLUSIONS: During treatment of SHPT, cinacalcet use was associated with a decrease in FGF-23 concentrations, whereas vitamin D analogs were associated with an increase. The divergent effects of these treatments on FGF-23 seem to be independent of modification of PTH. It is possible that effects of cinacalcet and vitamin D analogs on FGF-23 may be mediated indirectly by other effects on bone and mineral metabolism.
Authors: Christian Faul; Ansel P Amaral; Behzad Oskouei; Ming-Chang Hu; Alexis Sloan; Tamara Isakova; Orlando M Gutiérrez; Robier Aguillon-Prada; Joy Lincoln; Joshua M Hare; Peter Mundel; Azorides Morales; Julia Scialla; Michael Fischer; Elsayed Z Soliman; Jing Chen; Alan S Go; Sylvia E Rosas; Lisa Nessel; Raymond R Townsend; Harold I Feldman; Martin St John Sutton; Akinlolu Ojo; Crystal Gadegbeku; Giovana Seno Di Marco; Stefan Reuter; Dominik Kentrup; Klaus Tiemann; Marcus Brand; Joseph A Hill; Orson W Moe; Makoto Kuro-O; John W Kusek; Martin G Keane; Myles Wolf Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2011-10-10 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Katherine Wesseling-Perry; G Chris Harkins; He-jing Wang; Robert Elashoff; Barbara Gales; Mara J Horwitz; Andrew F Stewart; Harald Jüppner; Isidro B Salusky Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-04-09 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Ana L E Cancela; Rodrigo B Oliveira; Fabiana G Graciolli; Luciene M dos Reis; Fellype Barreto; Daniela V Barreto; Lilian Cuppari; Vanda Jorgetti; Aluizio B Carvalho; Maria Eugênia Canziani; Rosa M A Moysés Journal: Nephron Clin Pract Date: 2010-08-04
Authors: Jessica Kendrick; Alfred K Cheung; James S Kaufman; Tom Greene; William L Roberts; Gerard Smits; Michel Chonchol Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-09-07 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Ignacio López; M Encarnación Rodríguez-Ortiz; Yolanda Almadén; Fátima Guerrero; A Montes de Oca; Carmen Pineda; Vicky Shalhoub; Mariano Rodríguez; Escolástico Aguilera-Tejero Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2011-04-27 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Rosilene Motta Elias; Maria Aparecida Dalboni; Ana Carolina E Coelho; Rosa M A Moysés Journal: Curr Osteoporos Rep Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 5.096
Authors: Jonathan P Law; Luke Pickup; Davor Pavlovic; Jonathan N Townend; Charles J Ferro Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2022-09-22 Impact factor: 2.877